Re: [WSG] ASP, PHP and Ruby - oh my!
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote: [...] since ASP is obviously over whether its a good tool or not. [...] Thanks, www.asp.net ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Scrolling A Div
Take a look at http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/SliderDemo hth :) w.// Chris Kennon wrote: Hi, I'm curious if anyone has knowledge on creating a custom scrollbar graphic for controlling a div? I've seen custom buttons and can go this route, but would like a custom scrollbar , similar to what you can create in FLASH for a textField. Sorry for using the (f) word :) Respectfully, Chris ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Your email requires verification verify#a6vQxgsxnTQ2Ky73eCXlkHoHksHXd3PV
OMG, a list of web proffesionals non-the-less! On 12/12/05, Natalie Buxton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can People PLEASE stop replying to this rubbish email.The list does NOT require you to reply. Can an Admin please take care of it? On 12/13/05, Fenguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 写道:Due to the volume of Spam around the internet, and in the interests of keeping the internet as spam-free as possible, unfortunately, the message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a spam source. To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave the subject line intact.Full apologies to those legitimate messages that are being verified, but, you will only need to verify once! Thanks for your assistance in helping to clear the internet of spam! The headers of the message sent from your address are show below:From wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Mon Dec 12 12:04:07 2005Received: from [ 216.119.112.83] (helo= mail.webboy.net) by spirit.premierservers.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Elr5p-0001Il-0y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:04:07 -0500From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgMIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; charset=Windows-1252; boundary=SM_c877dea0-6c92-451d-af83-7fb727368263Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:45:46 1100message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help** ** The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help**
Re: [WSG] Altering a Valid (X)HTML with DHTML = Is it still REAL LY valid?
Making an element invalid, whether it be in the HTML or through JS, makes that element invalid. The validator might not catch it but the fact stands. Correct me if I am wrong. HTH :] w .// Jamie Mason wrote: Hi all, Did I ask something really daft here or...? I'd appreciate your help or opinions. Thanks, Jamie Mason Skybet.com *From:* Jamie Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 09 November 2005 11:10 *To:* 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org' *Subject:* [WSG] Altering a Valid (X)HTML with DHTML = Is it still REALLY valid? Hi all, I was looking at the source of the Fisheye demo after reading about it here on WSG - hoping it would be valid. It contains it's own made up attributes which devalidate the code. So then I thought fine, I'll just take them out the source and write them in with JavaScript onload instead, making sure it degrades well. But that's where I thought, is that REALLY valid? It'll pass at the W3C validator but my generated source is going to be invalid. Screen readers in my fairly limited understanding (sorry, I'm still young and learning :) ) don't use JavaScript so *should* be ok right? Which groups of users would be affected by this? Respectfully, and thanks in advance. Jamie Mason Skybet.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Altering a Valid (X)HTML with DHTML = Is it still REAL LY valid?
It's a tricky one How? If a tree falls in a wood and no-one hears it - does it still make a noise? w .// Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Quoting Jamie Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, Did I ask something really daft here or...? I'd appreciate your help or opinions. I'm at d.Construct at the moment, but I've been formulating a reply over the last few days. It's a tricky one...but I'll be attempting a reply once I'm back :) P ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)
That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does. Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards compliant, effiecientJS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? If your going to do that you might as well try to do it in plain text aswell. HTH w On 11/8/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ? http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.htmlif yes, please shot a kickstart--RegardsJad madiBloghttp://EasyHTTP.com/jad/Web standards Planet http://W3planet.net/**The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list getting help**
Re: [WSG] Standards and .NET
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/ASPNET2XHTML.asp VS2005 drastically improves this situ. hth :] w Chris Kennon wrote: Hi, Yesterday I spoke with you all regarding issues with using CSS and .NET. Below is the site underdevelopment. I'm told div's are casuing a problem, in addition to tdth Could someone look over this and offer suggestions, on Standards based implementation with .NET /Today we found screen resolution Problem. Please test different screen/ /resolutions also try to use tables instead of div tags./ / / Try the following link to get an idea of what we are getting. http://www.red-threads.com/beacontest/processes.aspx ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
