Re: [WSG] Firefox float/clear:both ¿bug?

2005-07-28 Thread kemie guaida




Placing even a html comment (i usually just have something like
!--clearing div--) will do the trick too.

kemie guaida :: monolinea.com

Julin Landerreche wrote:

  If I remove the second rule (or remove the
set of properties), the page is displayed correctly.


  
No, it doesnt display correctly
  
It seems that the empty div must have some content (like ".") to clear
the floated div.
  
  





Re: [WSG] PNG support

2005-06-16 Thread kemie guaida




It's enough to put the link to the _javascript_ inside a ie conditional
comment, so opera can't see it.
:)

kemie


...:| kemie |:...

.:| www.monolinea.com
|:.



Anthony Cartmell wrote:

  
Sadly this doesn't work in Opera 8.
  


Why should it?

  
  
For people who use Opera ;)
  
  
What I meant was, the page in question doesn't work in Opera 8.
  
  
They probably need to tweak their browser-sniffing or something, as,
as you say, Opera doesn't need anything special to display
alpha-channel PNGs.
  
  
Cheers!
  
  
Anthony
  





[WSG] inline-block support?

2005-05-31 Thread kemie guaida




I was sure that there was some major browser not implementing
display:inline-block, but in a quick test firefox 1.03, Opera 7 8
and even IE 6 are interpreting it correctly.I have yet to test on a
mac, but that would seem to cover a lot of users. Anything I'm
missing? Any recent documentation on browser support?

thanks

Kemie


...:| kemie |:...

.:| www.monolinea.com
|:.




  
  





Re: [WSG] IE not displaying a link as a block level element

2005-05-11 Thread kemie guaida




#mainnav li {list-style-type:none; margin:0; 	padding:0;display:inline;}
You can't have a block-level element within an inline one... try changing display:inline to float:left instead

cheers

kemie



...:| kemie |:...

.:| www.monolinea.com
|:.



  
  





Re: [WSG] multiple columns and 100% height

2005-04-18 Thread kemie guaida




Some of my 100% column bookmarks:
http://www.pixy.cz/blogg/clanky/css-3col-layout/
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/challenge/3cols/?add=right
http://www.redmelon.net/tstme/3cols2/
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=AnyColumnLongest

hope you find something there :)

cheers

kemie



...:| kemie |:...

.:| www.monolinea.com
|:.










Re: [WSG] Fixed pixel fontsize - resizable font size

2005-04-14 Thread kemie guaida




This table by reed design might be helpful:
http://www.reeddesign.co.uk/test/points-pixels.html

kemie

...:| kemie |:...

.:| www.monolinea.com
|:.





  
  





Re: [WSG] valid tracker code

2005-02-16 Thread kemie guaida




Patrick Lauke has a validating version of the extreme tracker counter
on his page:
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/67/

cheers

kemie

-- 
...:| kemie |:...

.:| www.monolinea.com
|:.





Re: [WSG] Targeting Mac IE5.1 on OSX

2005-02-14 Thread kemie guaida
you can use IE's conditional comments, which let you target specific 
versions of IE:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp
regards
kemie
Joe Leech wrote:
Hi [WSG],
I'm wondering if anybody can help.  I'm having real problems 
positioning an element absolutely on Mac IE 5.  It works fine in IE 
5.23 on Mac OSX but is out on IE 5.1 on OS9.
Does anybody know a way of targeting IE 5.1 on OS9 without effecting 
IE 5.23 on OSx?

Thanks in advance,
joe
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


--
...:| kemie |:...
.:| www.monolinea.com http://www.monolinea.com |:.
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] NZ Photo gallery test please

2005-01-26 Thread kemie guaida
Ooh, nice to see this in action!
(I wrote the original minimum blue theme that you based your design on :) )
Things are looking good on firefox1.0/win2k
/kemie
Hi
could a few people have a quick look at my newly constructed New 
Zealand photo gallery to make sure there aren't any obvious display 
errors that would scare off viewers/potential customers?

http://www.bhatt.id.au/photos/NewZealand/
I've already checked it with the W3C validators, Firefox 1.0, IE6 SP1, 
IE 5.5 and Opera 7.52

FYI It's a heavily hacked version of http://singapore.sourceforge.net/
thanks

--
: Kemie Guaida :
http://www.monolinea.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**