RE: [WSG] Another site review
Looks good (I've only tried it in Win/Firefox so far) but the thing that immediately struck me is that you have all the MIDI files in the site root. I know this isn't a standards issue, but wouldn't it be better to split them into alphabetical folders? Maybe I'm a data structure nutcase, but that would annoy me. Other than that, simple, clean design. I especially like the way the text is so clear - good choice of font, size and color. Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bennie Shepherd Sent: 04 November 2004 17:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] Another site review I would like to get comments on my site. http://bennieshepherd.com Thanks guys... -- Get Firefox Browser http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=6908&t=58 Bennie's MIDI Page http://bennieshepherd.com/ Athens, Georgia, Relay For Life http://www.athensrelay.net/ Montrose, Colorado, Relay For Life http://montroserelay.com/ Grand Junction, Colorado, Relay For Life http://grandjunctionrelay.org LZ Friendly Veterans Org http://lzfriendly.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another site review
I went to the page by clicking your link, using FF, clicked on the Validator tab in the Web Developer toolbar. Is there a glitch with that tab? Leslie Riggs Bennie Shepherd wrote: The doc type is at the top of the page and the site validates xhtml strict. Are you sure you validated the right site? :o) On 11/4/2004 1:51:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looks sharp - but doesn't validate. No doctype?? Oh, wait...it's > further down the page, should be right up top before anything else. > Otherwise the validator defaults to HTML 4.01 Transitional, and with > that you have some invalid markup to fix. > > Leslie Riggs > ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another site review
The doc type is at the top of the page and the site validates xhtml strict. Are you sure you validated the right site? :o) On 11/4/2004 1:51:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Looks sharp - but doesn't validate. No doctype?? Oh, wait...it's > further down the page, should be right up top before anything else. > Otherwise the validator defaults to HTML 4.01 Transitional, and with > that you have some invalid markup to fix. > > Leslie Riggs > > Bennie Shepherd wrote: > > > I would like to get comments on my site. > > http://bennieshepherd.com > > Thanks guys... > > > ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another site review
Looks sharp - but doesn't validate. No doctype?? Oh, wait...it's further down the page, should be right up top before anything else. Otherwise the validator defaults to HTML 4.01 Transitional, and with that you have some invalid markup to fix. Leslie Riggs Bennie Shepherd wrote: I would like to get comments on my site. http://bennieshepherd.com Thanks guys... ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] Another site review
> I would like to get comments on my site. It looks fine in winXp ie and firefox, the code is all valid and accessible (though it could use a language declaration) on most of the pages. The mailing list page which needs to be set up with labels at the least and so does the search page, etcd. - so it's the form pages that aren't accessible. The page looks fine when window size is reduced (except for the pages with form fields), and the text scales good (though the highlight gets off when at larger fonts, but still acceptable) You do have some variance in the widths of your main divs, like on the mailing list form page which I think is caused by the with of the form fields - and the email page the comment box goes over the div boundaries. Overall it's a nice job that a few quick fixes would make totally valid and accessible. The look is clean, simple, too the point, easy to figure out where to go - what I like to see :>) -- Susan R. Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
[WSG] Another site review
I would like to get comments on my site. http://bennieshepherd.com Thanks guys... -- Get Firefox Browser http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=6908&t=58 Bennie's MIDI Page http://bennieshepherd.com/ Athens, Georgia, Relay For Life http://www.athensrelay.net/ Montrose, Colorado, Relay For Life http://montroserelay.com/ Grand Junction, Colorado, Relay For Life http://grandjunctionrelay.org LZ Friendly Veterans Org http://lzfriendly.org ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
