Re: [WSG] Re: WYSIWYG editor
I was at a 'Driven by Design' seminar Apple put on in Cincinnati Nov of last year and saw them demo the CS apps at the Adobe booth. The guy from Adobe thought GoLive CS was it, kept asking 'can't do that with Dreamweaver can you?' I refrained from disagreeing with him...I guess he hadn't seen the MX 2004 release that came out a week or two before that seminar. Then again he also thought most developers won't hand code and that they'll love the Opera 7 based preview feature of GoLive. MX 2004 is a great tool to have, but then again so is a basic text editor. I'm torn (equally) between using MX or BBedit, just depends on my mood that day and the kind of site on what I'll use. My view on the original question: There's no really good option yet for a WYSIWYG editor, but Dreamweaver does the best job right now based on what you've got to choose from. MD On May 6, 2004, at 13:40, theGrafixGuy wrote: Dreamweaver MX 2k4 is definitely at the top o' the heap - one tool to build ANYTHING - java, css, html, xhtml, php, asp, cfm, etc etc etc. Can't go wrong there and for those that need it the wysiwyg feature can be turned on easily. I will say GoLive CS was a surprise though in its improvement, but it still isn't at the level of DW. Brian Grimmer theGrafixGuy http://www.thegrafixguy.com 503-887-4943 925-226-4085 (fax) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: WYSIWYG editor I respectfully disagree. Dreamweaver MX 2004 enables a designer to create well formed and valid XHTML. In addition, it has a built-in XHTML validator to check for poor syntax. Also, it's upgraded CSS panel produces valid style sheets, and often creates style sheets automatically in conjunction with XHTML. Kind regards, Mario S. Cisneros Dreamweaver is like kills ants with a machine gun. This app is excelent to edit nested tables, but thing like tableless it not so god -- We had using him practiclly like Homesite to had some markup control. WYSIWYG editor to XHTML/CSS is unnecessary, I suppose. At last, if among browser had yours particularities to render XHTML/CSS, a visual editor had yours particularities too. XHTML Strict/1.1 had a coerent structure, is simple to edit in your favorite ASCII editor. And CSS by TopStyle is very productive. At 20:56 6/5/2004 +1000, simon dodson wrote: dreamweaver mx ? www.macromedia.com From: "David Gironella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anybody know a WYSIWYG editor but that generate XHTML with CSS? * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *
RE: [WSG] Re: WYSIWYG editor
Dreamweaver MX 2k4 is definitely at the top o' the heap - one tool to build ANYTHING - java, css, html, xhtml, php, asp, cfm, etc etc etc. Can't go wrong there and for those that need it the wysiwyg feature can be turned on easily. I will say GoLive CS was a surprise though in its improvement, but it still isn't at the level of DW. Brian Grimmer theGrafixGuy http://www.thegrafixguy.com 503-887-4943 925-226-4085 (fax) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: WYSIWYG editor I respectfully disagree. Dreamweaver MX 2004 enables a designer to create well formed and valid XHTML. In addition, it has a built-in XHTML validator to check for poor syntax. Also, it's upgraded CSS panel produces valid style sheets, and often creates style sheets automatically in conjunction with XHTML. Kind regards, Mario S. Cisneros > Dreamweaver is like kills ants with a machine gun. This app is excelent > to edit nested tables, but thing like tableless it not so god -- We had > using him practiclly like Homesite to had some markup control. > > WYSIWYG editor to XHTML/CSS is unnecessary, I suppose. At last, if among > browser had yours particularities to render XHTML/CSS, a visual editor > had yours particularities too. > > XHTML Strict/1.1 had a coerent structure, is simple to edit in your > favorite ASCII editor. And CSS by TopStyle is very productive. > > > At 20:56 6/5/2004 +1000, simon dodson wrote: >>dreamweaver mx ? www.macromedia.com >> >>From: "David Gironella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Anybody know a WYSIWYG editor but that generate XHTML with CSS? > > > > * > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *
Re: [WSG] Re: WYSIWYG editor
I respectfully disagree. Dreamweaver MX 2004 enables a designer to create well formed and valid XHTML. In addition, it has a built-in XHTML validator to check for poor syntax. Also, it's upgraded CSS panel produces valid style sheets, and often creates style sheets automatically in conjunction with XHTML. Kind regards, Mario S. Cisneros > Dreamweaver is like kills ants with a machine gun. This app is excelent > to edit nested tables, but thing like tableless it not so god -- We had > using him practiclly like Homesite to had some markup control. > > WYSIWYG editor to XHTML/CSS is unnecessary, I suppose. At last, if among > browser had yours particularities to render XHTML/CSS, a visual editor > had yours particularities too. > > XHTML Strict/1.1 had a coerent structure, is simple to edit in your > favorite ASCII editor. And CSS by TopStyle is very productive. > > > At 20:56 6/5/2004 +1000, simon dodson wrote: >>dreamweaver mx ? www.macromedia.com >> >>From: "David Gironella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Anybody know a WYSIWYG editor but that generate XHTML with CSS? > > > > * > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *
[WSG] Re: WYSIWYG editor
Dreamweaver is like kills ants with a machine gun. This app is excelent to edit nested tables, but thing like tableless it not so god -- We had using him practiclly like Homesite to had some markup control. WYSIWYG editor to XHTML/CSS is unnecessary, I suppose. At last, if among browser had yours particularities to render XHTML/CSS, a visual editor had yours particularities too. XHTML Strict/1.1 had a coerent structure, is simple to edit in your favorite ASCII editor. And CSS by TopStyle is very productive. At 20:56 6/5/2004 +1000, simon dodson wrote: dreamweaver mx ? www.macromedia.com From: "David Gironella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anybody know a WYSIWYG editor but that generate XHTML with CSS? * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *