[WSG] Russ' point from last night's meeting

2004-01-16 Thread James Ellis
Hi all

For those who didn't make it, Russ in his presentation made a really 
good point about cross browser implementation

Basically we can tweak to 6.7 different browsers but are the people who 
view our sites going to do the same? Provided the content is structured 
to be readable for our IE5 and NS4 viewers (for instance) out there, 
they might just say hey that looks all right They may even label 
something normal that we call broken.

It certainly is a good point to remember when we get stuck in the CSS 
tweak-to-death mindset.

Cheers
James




*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



Re: [WSG] Russ' point from last night's meeting

2004-01-16 Thread Vaska . WSG
Do people really code/tweak for NS4?  My netscape traffic generally 
ranges less than 3% and I can only imagine that a very small chunk of 
that is actually NS4.  Am I missing something?

v

On 16 Jan 2004, at 11:10, James Ellis wrote:

Hi all

For those who didn't make it, Russ in his presentation made a really 
good point about cross browser implementation

Basically we can tweak to 6.7 different browsers but are the people who 
view our sites going to do the same? Provided the content is structured 
to be readable for our IE5 and NS4 viewers (for instance) out there, 
they might just say hey that looks all right They may even label 
something normal that we call broken.

It certainly is a good point to remember when we get stuck in the CSS 
tweak-to-death mindset.

Cheers
James
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
* 



RE: [WSG] Russ' point from last night's meeting

2004-01-16 Thread Peter Firminger
In some Government organisations, Netscape 4 is still used as the default
browser generally to the use of the Netscape email client and because they
paid a site licence for corporate use (which is why Netscape had to bring
out an update to 4.7? last year). If one of these organisations is your
client, then there is a very good reason to tweak for it.

Of course you urge them to change the policy, but sysadmins (especially
government ones) are not always fast on technology change.

P

 -Original Message-
 From: Vaska.WSG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 1:05 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [WSG] Russ' point from last night's meeting


 Do people really code/tweak for NS4?  My netscape traffic generally
 ranges less than 3% and I can only imagine that a very small chunk of
 that is actually NS4.  Am I missing something?

 v


 On 16 Jan 2004, at 11:10, James Ellis wrote:


 Hi all

 For those who didn't make it, Russ in his presentation made a really
 good point about cross browser implementation

 Basically we can tweak to 6.7 different browsers but are the
 people who
 view our sites going to do the same? Provided the content is
 structured
 to be readable for our IE5 and NS4 viewers (for instance) out there,
 they might just say hey that looks all right They may
 even label
 something normal that we call broken.

 It certainly is a good point to remember when we get stuck in the CSS
 tweak-to-death mindset.

 Cheers
 James

 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 *

 *
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 *



*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*