Thanks fo the tip Brian, I'll update the W3C CSS Button by this arvo. I
was wondering about that, thanks for pointing it out
Cheers
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Software Engineer - Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> www.google.com is just as valid in e-mail as http://www.google.com or even
> http://google.com.
>
> In fact I'd be surprised to find a web browser or e-mail program that does
> not support it.
>
> I guess it is like the word "ain't." Remember "ain't ain't a word cause it
> ain't in the dictionary." Well sorry to say, but it is and it is
> recognized
> and accepted slang by all but the purists.
>
> Darian, BTW, (and I am updating all of my pages to reflect this as well)
> your W3C CSS button would be better served if it pointed to the following
> URL - http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer - as it shows the
> validation results rather than having to figure out where to go after you
> get to the default page as your current link
> http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ does.
>
> Granted us "pros" know what to do, but that "computer-ignorant" user out
> there that may actually be impressed and won over as a client with such
> validation may get lost on the page. Remember keep it simple because there
> is always a better idiot out there to break the idiot proof system!
>
> Brian
>
> *
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> *
>
>
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
