Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
thanks for the responses, agreed that the header navigation is odd, should be easy to alter though as should the odd order of the headers I find myself often using pixel sizes for fonts, a habit I am trying to break (honest - an owen briggs article will help me plus a few google searchs and of course time) personally I find it strange that he has choosen to use both sIFR and flashObject atb Sam Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: sam sherlock wrote: I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site... Looking good in some browsers - but can't take any stress. - My Firefox doesn't like it. - Opera 8... not too bad. - Relying on font-sizes in pixels (mostly) which breaks badly in IE/win (and in all other browsers also, of course) if visitors like to have some say in the matter. - I regard this as misuse of headlines: h2a href=index.phpHome .01/a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 ...should have been a list, IMO. --- Conclusion: this looks like a page that hasn't been tested well across browser-land. Might have turned out a lot better if it were... regards Georg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site critism / praise and other comments atb - Sam ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
I think it's great, but it looks awful with CSS turned off :S. Works fine w/o JavaScript. It prints ok too. One page I tested had errors. http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//www.circodeliaproducciones.com/circodelia_producciones_artisticas_trabajos_clientes.php ciao, Zulema Z u l e m a O r t i z w e b d e s i g n e r email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://zoblue.com/ weblog : http://blog.zoblue.com/ browser : http://getfirefox.com/ sam sherlock wrote: I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site critism / praise and other comments atb - Sam ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
it looks unformated with styles disabled, as do any css driven sites, specifically what looks awful? I think the only issue with css turned off is that the logo is a transparent gif which looks bad on white bkgd everything else looks fine to me (as far as unformated goes) any other thoughts, S Zulema wrote: I think it's great, but it looks awful with CSS turned off :S. Works fine w/o JavaScript. It prints ok too. One page I tested had errors. http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A//www.circodeliaproducciones.com/circodelia_producciones_artisticas_trabajos_clientes.php ciao, Zulema Z u l e m a O r t i z w e b d e s i g n e r email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://zoblue.com/ weblog : http://blog.zoblue.com/ browser : http://getfirefox.com/ sam sherlock wrote: I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site critism / praise and other comments atb - Sam ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
sam sherlock wrote: I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site Not much. critism / praise and other comments atb - Sam Regards, David Laakso -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site There are quite a number of CSS validation errors (W3C online validator). Seems to be valid XHTML strict (W3C again). Attractive, interesting design imho. Layout blows up with text-resizing, though. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
its not very in depth piece of critism, the site users flash (which may be why you don't like it) I find that clients like flash ask for it and demand it, they don't know of webstandards i am researching method of marrying the two disciplines (and indeed the wider array of web disciplines) I have also found this UFO http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/ufo/ which impresses me greatly - silent javascript different sites require different techniques every site i make uses flash - I don;t want this to be at the expense of webstandards and the benefits they behold I strive fourth with my aims and research can members be descriptive with critism? please many thanks Sam David Laakso wrote: sam sherlock wrote: I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site Not much. critism / praise and other comments atb - Sam Regards, David Laakso ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
sam sherlock wrote: http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site critism / praise and other comments Look wise, it's quite pleasing. The underlying markup, however, looks a bit funky. The navigation is marked up as a series of H2s...which is bizarre. The order in which the headings appear in the markup is also wrong..it should be ascending, not descending. Style attributes all over the place. An actual IMG element with a width of 1 pixel used as a separator. Nah, all style, no substance, which is a shame really. -- Patrick H. Lauke __ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site
sam sherlock wrote: I happened acrosss this site on stylegala. http://www.circodeliaproducciones.com/ I would like to know what the list members think of the site... Looking good in some browsers - but can't take any stress. - My Firefox doesn't like it. - Opera 8... not too bad. - Relying on font-sizes in pixels (mostly) which breaks badly in IE/win (and in all other browsers also, of course) if visitors like to have some say in the matter. - I regard this as misuse of headlines: h2a href=index.phpHome .01/a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 h2a href=circodel... /a/h2 ...should have been a list, IMO. --- Conclusion: this looks like a page that hasn't been tested well across browser-land. Might have turned out a lot better if it were... regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
