Re: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML
McCain wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to validate like XHTML 1 Strict a web page with a form. > There is checkbox that it has to be checked using "checked". The W3C > validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility > of using "checked" in XHTML? > > McCain This should do it (I think): The following example is not allowed: (minimized attributes are not allowed in xhtml) -- Lennart Fylling http://lennart-fylling.com Norway ** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > > Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ > Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge > To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 > > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML
Thanks!! -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Golding, Antony Enviado el: viernes, 13 de agosto de 2004 12:06 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML Shouldn't checked="checked" validate? Antony Golding Principal e-Government Services Officer Salford City Council Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: 0161 793 2232 -Original Message- From: McCain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2004 11:04 To: Webstandardsgroup Subject: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML Hi, I am trying to validate like XHTML 1 Strict a web page with a form. There is checkbox that it has to be checked using "checked". The W3C validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility of using "checked" in XHTML? McCain ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
Re: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML
same goes for things like disabled="disabled", selected="selected" etc... Patrick H. Lauke McCain wrote: Hi, I am trying to validate like XHTML 1 Strict a web page with a form. There is checkbox that it has to be checked using "checked". The W3C validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility of using "checked" in XHTML? McCain ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** -- _ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML
McCain wrote: > There is checkbox that it has to be checked using "checked". The W3C > validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility > of using "checked" in XHTML? You have to use something like: and similarly: Value ..etc. It's all a bit redundant, but XHTML attributes must have values... Owen -Original Message- From: McCain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2004 11:04 To: Webstandardsgroup Subject: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML Hi, I am trying to validate like XHTML 1 Strict a web page with a form. There is checkbox that it has to be checked using "checked". The W3C validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility of using "checked" in XHTML? McCain ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you should not disclose, copy, distribute or take action on the contents of this information, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee. Any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by email immediately and delete the message from your computer. ECOTEC Research & Consulting Limited Registered in England No. 1650169 Registered Office: Priestley House, 28-34 Albert Street, Birmingham, B4 7UD, UK Tel: +44 (0)121 616 3600 http://www.ecotec.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
RE: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML
Shouldn't checked="checked" validate? Antony Golding Principal e-Government Services Officer Salford City Council Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: 0161 793 2232 -Original Message- From: McCain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2004 11:04 To: Webstandardsgroup Subject: [WSG] checkbox checked in XHTML Hi, I am trying to validate like XHTML 1 Strict a web page with a form. There is checkbox that it has to be checked using "checked". The W3C validador gives me error constantly in this. There is no possibility of using "checked" in XHTML? McCain ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ** DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail Thank you. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/ Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **
