Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-10 Thread David Dorward


On 10 Jul 2007, at 04:20, Dean Matthews wrote:

On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when  
you try to validate a file.


Yes I see, but how do you link a Valid CSS icon to an advanced  
search?


Validate it, then copy/paste the URL (don't forget to convert  
ampersands to entities).


Or see http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon

--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-10 Thread michael.brockington
Not sure about the 1.X series, but text shadow is supported in Safari
2.X  - I have been using it for quite a while, and love it.

Mike 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucien Stals
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 4:32 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream 
browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can 
only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until 
Leopard gets released).



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Cameron Singe

Hey dean,

I am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not
be picked up by the validation

On 7/10/07, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here:

Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exist :
#7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px

Offending CSS:

h2, h3 {
margin: 24px 0 0;
font-size: 1.4em;
text-shadow: #7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px;
color: #25447d;
line-height: 1.4em;
}

Please excuse me if I'm incurably dense,

Dean




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread John Faulds
Text-shadow's part of the CSS3 spec and not CSS 2.1 isn't it? So if you're  
validating against CSS 2.1, you'll get an error.


On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:03:46 +1000, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here:

Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exist : #7f7f7f  
2px 2px 2px


Offending CSS:

h2, h3 {
margin: 24px 0 0;
font-size: 1.4em;
text-shadow: #7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px;
color: #25447d;
line-height: 1.4em;
}

Please excuse me if I'm incurably dense,

Dean




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***





--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Dean Matthews


On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Cameron Singe wrote:

 am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which  
might not be picked up by the validation


Nope, your right.

I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the  
curve ;-)


Dean




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh


On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dean Matthews wrote:

I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the  
curve ;-)
Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you  
try to validate a file.


Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://emps.l-c-n.com





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Lucien Stals
Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers
currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of
Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released).

So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able to
appreciated your fine work :(

Lucien.
-- 

Lucien Stals
Multimedia/Web Developer
Academic Development and Support
Swinburne University of Technology
PO Box 218 Hawthorn, 3122, Australia
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
telephone: +61 3 9214 4474
office: AD223


 On 10/07/2007 at 1:20 pm, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
 
 Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when  
 you try to validate a file.
 
 Yes I see, but how do you link a Valid CSS icon to an advanced
search?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Dean
 
 
 
 
 ***
 List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm 
 Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm 
 Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ***

Swinburne University of Technology
CRICOS Provider Code: 00111D

NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the use 
of the addressee. They may contain information that is privileged or protected 
by copyright. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, 
distribution, printing, copying or use is strictly prohibited. The University 
does not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are secure and there is 
also a risk that it may be corrupted in transmission. It is your responsibility 
to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening them. If you 
have received this transmission in error, please contact us on +61 3 9214 8000 
and delete it immediately from your system. We do not accept liability in 
connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, 
unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Lucien Stals
TEL;WORK:4474
ORG:;Academic Development and Support
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
N:Stals;Lucien
END:VCARD



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Matthew Ohlman

Lucien Stals wrote:

Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers
currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of
Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released).

So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able to
appreciated your fine work :(

Lucien.
  
I don't think Firefox does.  And if I recall correctly (call me on it if 
I am wrong) text-shadow was included in the CSS 2 specs, but it was 
dropped due to lack of support.


Also, Dean, it is possible to link to a CSS validation with advanced 
options.  Just copy and paste the entire URL out of the address bar when 
you validate it.  For example:


http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ohlman.com%2Fstyle.csswarning=1profile=css3usermedium=all

You can see that the profile option is equal to css3 in the above URL.

HTH
Matthew




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Dean Matthews


On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Lucien Stals wrote:

Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream  
browsers

currently support text shadows.


Yes, well it really is a let down viewing a site in Safari or OmniWeb  
and then viewing it in IE or FF.


I am finding quite a few clients impressed with the difference in the  
new Windows Safari and making the switch.


Maybe Safari will become mainstream (especially with the success of  
iPhone ;)


The more design can be put in the browser and removed from image  
files the better.




On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:46 PM, Matthew Ohlman wrote:
Just copy and paste the entire URL out of the address bar when you  
validate it.


Thanks for the tip Matthew!

Dean




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***