Re: [WSG] Son of Suckerfish and IE 6 (SP2)
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:03:20 +0100, info [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's also said that adding: -- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -- at the beginning of the file disables this behaviour. I think you meant: !-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -- ^ it was missing the exclamation point. :D Yes, and put it after doctype to avoid quirksmode. http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/motw.asp?frame=true -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Son of Suckerfish and IE 6 (SP2)
I notice that IE6 with service pack 2 installed initially blocks the JavaScript that makes the li hover sections drop It's only when browsing local files. -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Son of Suckerfish and IE 6 (SP2)
Yes, I've encountered that as well. I think It's interesting that it blocks javascript on your own computer, but will gleefully accept it (and activeX objects and whatnot) from the internet (because we all know who how safe the internet is). I guess it's just one of those 'undocumented features'. Jan Brasna wrote: I notice that IE6 with service pack 2 installed initially blocks the JavaScript that makes the li hover sections drop It's only when browsing local files. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
OT: Re: [WSG] Son of Suckerfish and IE 6 (SP2)
(and activeX objects and whatnot) from the internet (because we all know who how safe the internet is). I guess it's just one of those 'undocumented features'. I think it's intended as a security fix for all those *script mail viruses (iloveyou etc.) The sad point is that the only solution for PNG transparency (filters) also stops working on local :( -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Son of Suckerfish and IE 6 (SP2)
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 15:03:03 +0100, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I've encountered that as well. I think It's interesting that it blocks javascript on your own computer, but will gleefully accept it (and activeX objects and whatnot) from the internet (because we all know who how safe the internet is). I guess it's just one of those 'undocumented features'. It's well documented, just search MSDN on IE SP2 changes. It's also said that adding: -- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -- at the beginning of the file disables this behaviour. -- regards, Kornel Lesiski ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Son of Suckerfish and IE 6 (SP2)
Kornel Lesinski wrote: It's well documented, just search MSDN on IE SP2 changes. It's also said that adding: -- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -- at the beginning of the file disables this behaviour. I think you meant: !-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -- ^ it was missing the exclamation point. :D Once the pages are put up live, tho, that line should be removed right? regards, Z *Z u l e m a O r t i z* w e b d e s i g n e r email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] website : http://zoblue.com/ weblog : http://blog.zoblue.com/ browser : http://getfirefox.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
