RE: [WSG] killing the object tag

2005-04-25 Thread Richard Ishida

 What do you guys think of this? Is their somewhere I can 
 submit this too?

From http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/

Public discussion may take place on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (archive). To subscribe
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word subscribe in the
subject line.

hth
RI

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] killing the object tag

2005-04-25 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Alan Trick wrote:
XHTML 2 is going to get rid of the img tag, which I think is good. 
object
[...]
it's practically impossible to use it for anything useful 
as long as your clients are using IE.
Alan,
XHTML 2 is not meant to be backwards compatible. As IE doesn't 
officially support XHTML 2 at all (as, to my knowledge, no browser does 
natively), this discussion is irrelevant, IMHO. XHTML 2 should not be 
sent to anything other than user agents which (will eventually) support it.

Any similarities between XHTML 2 and XHTML 1.x are purely coincidental, 
if you will.

--
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] killing the object tag

2005-04-25 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Alan Trick wrote:
When (if)? IE supports HTML it may still want to be able to support it's 
old buggy object.  Just look at all their CSS bugs they have in the 
name of 'backwards-compatibily' and 'consistancy'.
But that's my point: XHTML 2 as a specification is not meant to be 
backwards compatible, so there's no excuse or reason for saying our 
XHTML 2 implements it this way so that older browsers can access it as 
well.

--
Patrick H. Lauke
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**