Re: [WSG] meta tag questions

2009-02-24 Thread Ben Dodson
I don't know about the Dublin Core issue but my gut feeling with  
geo.position and your example would be that of course the bed and  
breakfast in Pisa, Italy should have their location as the hotel will  
always be in the same place.  I think that you've looked at the issue  
from the wrong side in that you assume it would only show in regional  
searches (e.g. an italian search engine) whereas in actual fact it  
should show up in a global search for that region - e.g. if I search  
for hotels pisa italy I would expect it to show up as it's  
geo.position clearly states that is where it is and so the search  
engine can be 100% sure that it is in the area I'm looking for.


I haven't done any tests, etc, but that is what I would expect of the  
tag.  How much difference it makes in terms of SEO will be harder to  
gauge as I doubt that adding that tag will make you rank higher (as  
the search engines cater for the lowest possible denominator) but it  
should help in terms of specific search queries.


Ben

---
e: b...@bendodson.com
w: http://bendodson.com/

Feeling social?  Connect with me on various social networks at http://social.bendodson.com/ 
 - You might also want to follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/bendodson





On 24 Feb 2009, at 11:21, Bob Schwartz wrote:

I have questions regarding two types of meta tags, Dublin Core and  
geo.position:


1. Dublin Core: I have only been able to find older studies (2000)  
regarding the possible improvement in search engine positioning  
through the use of these tags. The conclusion in these olders  
studies was no significant imporvement, however they did go on to  
say that in the future these tags will play a more important role.  
Has that future arrived or are these tags essentialy still code  
bloat?


2. geo.position: According to Wikipedia geo.position tags help in  
returning regional search requests, or as they put it: It  
understandably makes little sense to look for a baker and find one  
who has his shop in a completely different town. If this is the  
case, then it would seem putting geo.position tags on a bed and  
breakfast site in Pisa, Italy that is trying to reach potential  
guests around the world would not be a good idea. Anyone have any  
experience or thoughts regarding these tags?


Thanks,

Bob Schwartz




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] meta tag questions

2009-02-24 Thread Bob Schwartz

Ben,

I think that you've looked at the issue from the wrong side in that  
you assume it would only show in regional searches (e.g. an italian  
search engine) whereas in actual fact it should show up in a global  
search for that region - e.g. if I search for hotels pisa italy I  
would expect it to show up as it's geo.position clearly states that  
is where it is and so the search engine can be 100% sure that it is  
in the area I'm looking for.


That's why I posted, to get another perspective - thanks - what you  
say makes perfect sense.



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



RE: [WSG] meta tag questions

2009-02-24 Thread Ted Drake
You can see dublin core as well as RDF and microformatted information has
been indexed by yahoo when you use the BOSS api and/or build a SearchMonkey
application.
I don't know how  much it influences Yahoo's rankings, but it is being used
in building the index.
http://developer.yahoo.com/boss
http://developer.yahoo.com/searchmonkey
http://developer.yahoo.com/yql
 
Ted
 

  _  

From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Ben Dodson
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 12:38 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] meta tag questions


I don't know about the Dublin Core issue but my gut feeling with
geo.position and your example would be that of course the bed and breakfast
in Pisa, Italy should have their location as the hotel will always be in the
same place.  I think that you've looked at the issue from the wrong side in
that you assume it would only show in regional searches (e.g. an italian
search engine) whereas in actual fact it should show up in a global search
for that region - e.g. if I search for hotels pisa italy I would expect it
to show up as it's geo.position clearly states that is where it is and so
the search engine can be 100% sure that it is in the area I'm looking for.


I haven't done any tests, etc, but that is what I would expect of the tag.
How much difference it makes in terms of SEO will be harder to gauge as I
doubt that adding that tag will make you rank higher (as the search engines
cater for the lowest possible denominator) but it should help in terms of
specific search queries. 

Ben

---
e: b...@bendodson.com
w: http://bendodson.com/


Feeling social?  Connect with me on various social networks at
http://social.bendodson.com/ - You might also want to follow me on Twitter
at http://twitter.com/bendodson





On 24 Feb 2009, at 11:21, Bob Schwartz wrote:


I have questions regarding two types of meta tags, Dublin Core and
geo.position:

1. Dublin Core: I have only been able to find older studies (2000) regarding
the possible improvement in search engine positioning through the use of
these tags. The conclusion in these olders studies was no significant
imporvement, however they did go on to say that in the future these tags
will play a more important role. Has that future arrived or are these tags
essentialy still code bloat?

2. geo.position: According to Wikipedia geo.position tags help in returning
regional search requests, or as they put it: It understandably makes little
sense to look for a baker and find one who has his shop in a completely
different town. If this is the case, then it would seem putting
geo.position tags on a bed and breakfast site in Pisa, Italy that is trying
to reach potential guests around the world would not be a good idea. Anyone
have any experience or thoughts regarding these tags?

Thanks,

Bob Schwartz




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*** 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] meta tag questions

2009-02-24 Thread Robert Turner




Hi Bob,

Bob Schwartz wrote:
2.
geo.position: According to Wikipedia geo.position tags help in
returning regional search requests, or as they put it: "It
understandably makes little sense to look for a baker and find one who
has his shop in a completely different town". If this is the case, then
it would seem putting geo.position tags on a bed and breakfast site in
Pisa, Italy that is trying to reach potential guests around the world
would not be a good idea. Anyone have any experience or thoughts
regarding these tags?
  
  

Does the geo ontology/schema also represent properties for longitude
and latitude? I wrote a geospacial inferencing engine a while back for
inferring distances between points using the great circle method. From
memory, I think it used the geo schema.

If it is for a web page, also look at using an 'ICBM' meta tag (eg.
meta name="ICBM" content="12.345, -67.890" / ).


***
  
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
  
***
  
  



-- 


 Rob Turner 
Company Leader 
 
www. f l e
x a d a t a .com
 
 +1 415 448 7652

+61 7 3040 1337









***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***begin:vcard
fn:Rob Turner
n:Turner;Rob
org:Flexa Pty Ltd
email;internet:r...@flexadata.com
title:Company Leader
tel;work:+61 7 3040 1337
tel;cell:+61 4 0115 9060
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://flexadata.com
version:2.1
end:vcard




Re: [WSG] meta tag questions

2009-02-24 Thread Bob Schwartz

Hi Robert.

Does the geo ontology/schema also represent properties for longitude  
and latitude? I wrote a geospacial inferencing engine a while back  
for inferring distances between points using the great circle  
method. From memory, I think it used the geo schema.


If it is for a web page, also look at using an 'ICBM' meta tag (eg.  
meta name=ICBM content=12.345, -67.890 / ).


Yes and the ICBM is part of them. As best I can tell a complete set  
looks like this:


meta name=geo.placename content=loc. Amerique, 10, 11020 Quart,  
Aosta (Valle d'Aosta), Italy

meta name=geo.position content=45.740005;7.368822
meta name=geo.region content=IT-Valle d'Aosta
meta name=ICBM content=45.740005, 7.368822


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***



Re: [WSG] meta tag questions

2009-02-24 Thread Robert Turner




Thanks Bob,

I've dug up some old java code that contained a snippet from the geo
schema I used (in a javadoc comment). Here it is:

  /**
...
 * pRDF Vocabulary for describing points:
 * code
 * rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 *   xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
 *   geo:Point
 * geo:lat54.5722/geo:lat
 * geo:long0.014024/geo:long
 *   /geo:Point
 * /rdf:RDF
 *
 * (eg. geo:Point geo:lat="54.5722" geo:long="0.014024"/ )
 * /code
...
*/
  

I hope this helps you out. 

Cheers,
Rob


Bob Schwartz wrote:
Hi
Robert.
  
  
  Does the geo ontology/schema also represent
properties for longitude and latitude? I wrote a geospacial inferencing
engine a while back for inferring distances between points using the
great circle method. From memory, I think it used the geo schema.


If it is for a web page, also look at using an 'ICBM' meta tag (eg.
meta name="ICBM" content="12.345, -67.890" / ).

  
  
Yes and the ICBM is part of them. As best I can tell a complete set
looks like this:
  
  
meta name="geo.placename" content="loc. Amerique, 10, 11020 Quart,
Aosta (Valle d'Aosta), Italy"
  
meta name="geo.position" content="45.740005;7.368822"
  
meta name="geo.region" content="IT-Valle d'Aosta"
  
meta name="ICBM" content="45.740005, 7.368822"
  
  
  
***
  
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
  
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
  
***
  
  



-- 


 Rob Turner 
Company Leader 
 
www. f l e
x a d a t a .com
 
 +1 415 448 7652

+61 7 3040 1337









***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org***begin:vcard
fn:Rob Turner
n:Turner;Rob
org:Flexa Pty Ltd
email;internet:r...@flexadata.com
title:Company Leader
tel;work:+61 7 3040 1337
tel;cell:+61 4 0115 9060
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://flexadata.com
version:2.1
end:vcard