[wsjt-devel] Auto sequence shouldn't stop after other op sends 73 to a different call...

2017-09-15 Thread Ross Primrose 
Having TX no longer enabled when someone comes back to a call other than 
your own is a great thing, but I don't think it should disable TX after 
a 73 sent to another call.  I  typically enable TX when I expect the 
CQing station to be sending 73 so I can transmit the full 15sec in the 
normally dead air after the CQing station sends 73. Currently, if you 
enable TX under those circumstances when the CQing station sends the 73 
TX enable is turned off


73, Ross N4RP

--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"

2017-07-12 Thread Ross Primrose 
I would submit that for ANY automated QSO sequencing STOPPING when you 
shouldn't be transmitting is MORE important than sending the correct 
transmission at the right time...


73

On 7/12/2017 11:03 AM, Neil Zampella wrote:
FWIW .. you have you mouse pointer over the HALT button, and you get 
ready to click, as for the missed period ... ?


I joked to a few people about this way back when FT8 was introduced, 
but jeez people ... its only 15 seconds ...


Neil, KN3ILZ


On 7/12/2017 10:28 AM, Ross Primrose wrote:
You must have faster wetware than I do... It's next to impossible to 
halt TX before the next TX cycle starts, and once the TX cycle 
starts, even if you halt it after 1sec you loose the possibility of 
decoding anyone else in that 15sec...


73, Ross N4RP

On 7/12/2017 7:15 AM, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:
That's built into the wetware (brain matter) of the person 
controlling the program :)



On Jul 11, 2017, at 10:22 PM, Ross Primrose <n...@n4rp.com> wrote:

One feature I'd like to see is if you answer a CQ, and the station 
comes back to someone else, halt tx...


73, Ross N4RP


On 07/11/2017 07:23 PM, Ricky Scott W7PSK wrote:
As Jim said, its a nice AID to us old timers that cant click the 
red in 1 second


-- Original Message --
From: "Jim - N4ST" <newsgr...@jimpricejr.com>
To: "'WSJT software development'" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: 7/11/2017 4:07:40 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"


Please keep "Call 1st".  It is a great aid to us old timers.
If people don't like it, don't click the box.


73,
Jim - N4ST


-Original Message-
From: Erik - [mailto:erikcarl...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:02
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"


"We are interested in feedback from users on the question of 
partial QSO

automation.  Should "Call 1st" be changed or removed?"

I like it as it is. One thing though, it gets broken by callsigns 
such as
EA8/G8BCG. When commuted to G8BCG for the QSO, auto sequence 
stops. Not a
big deal since reciprocal calls such as this one are not too 
common. My

over-riding request is to not remove "Call 1st".

Erik EI4KF.


 


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging

tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use 
the minimum transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired 
communications.”



-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel






-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”


--
Check out the vibra

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"

2017-07-12 Thread Ross Primrose 
You must have faster wetware than I do...  It's next to impossible to 
halt TX before the next TX cycle starts, and once the TX cycle starts, 
even if you halt it after 1sec you loose the possibility of decoding 
anyone else in that 15sec...


73, Ross N4RP

On 7/12/2017 7:15 AM, James Shaver (N2ADV) wrote:

That's built into the wetware (brain matter) of the person controlling the 
program :)


On Jul 11, 2017, at 10:22 PM, Ross Primrose <n...@n4rp.com> wrote:

One feature I'd like to see is if you answer a CQ, and the station comes back 
to someone else, halt tx...

73, Ross N4RP


On 07/11/2017 07:23 PM, Ricky Scott W7PSK wrote:
As Jim said, its a nice AID to us old timers that cant click the red in 1 second

-- Original Message --
From: "Jim - N4ST" <newsgr...@jimpricejr.com>
To: "'WSJT software development'" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: 7/11/2017 4:07:40 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"


Please keep "Call 1st".  It is a great aid to us old timers.
If people don't like it, don't click the box.


73,
Jim - N4ST


-Original Message-
From: Erik - [mailto:erikcarl...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:02
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"


"We are interested in feedback from users on the question of partial QSO
automation.  Should "Call 1st" be changed or removed?"

I like it as it is. One thing though, it gets broken by callsigns such as
EA8/G8BCG. When commuted to G8BCG for the QSO, auto sequence stops. Not a
big deal since reciprocal calls such as this one are not too common. My
over-riding request is to not remove "Call 1st".

Erik EI4KF.



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"

2017-07-11 Thread Ross Primrose 
One feature I'd like to see is if you answer a CQ, and the station comes 
back to someone else, halt tx...


73, Ross N4RP

On 07/11/2017 07:23 PM, Ricky Scott W7PSK wrote:
As Jim said, its a nice AID to us old timers that cant click the red 
in 1 second


-- Original Message --
From: "Jim - N4ST" 
To: "'WSJT software development'" 
Sent: 7/11/2017 4:07:40 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"


Please keep "Call 1st".  It is a great aid to us old timers.
If people don't like it, don't click the box.


73,
Jim - N4ST


-Original Message-
From: Erik - [mailto:erikcarl...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 12:02
To: WSJT software development 
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and "Call 1st"


"We are interested in feedback from users on the question of partial QSO
automation.  Should "Call 1st" be changed or removed?"

I like it as it is. One thing though, it gets broken by callsigns 
such as
EA8/G8BCG. When commuted to G8BCG for the QSO, auto sequence stops. 
Not a

big deal since reciprocal calls such as this one are not too common. My
over-riding request is to not remove "Call 1st".

Erik EI4KF.


 


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 + Autoseq + Free Text TX5

2017-07-10 Thread Ross Primrose 
Should being the key word.  I was working with another local ham last 
night, I was running 7833, he was 78 20somthing.  I sent a TX5 that was 
"5W 160L TU 73" when he would have been expecting a generated 73 and his 
end didn't trigger the 73, he just kept sending the auto-generated RRR...


73, Ross N4RP

On 07/10/2017 03:58 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:

On 10/07/2017 20:50, Neil Zampella wrote:
Will using a non-standard message cause the receiving station's 
program to not trigger their reply ?? 


Hi Neil,

there is no need for a reply to a sign off message but if it contains 
the word "73" it should work the same as a standard 73 message.


73
Bill
G4WJS.


-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel



--
FCC Section 97.313(a) “At all times, an amateur station must use the minimum 
transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired communications.”


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel