Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 online logging

[George J Molnar]

Same here. TQSL can map FT8 to “Data,” which works fine. For the time being, I 
am forgoing FT8 uploads to eQSL. 

George J Molnar, KF2T 
Nevada, USA


> On Jul 3, 2017, at 7:22 PM, Dan Malcolm  wrote:
> 
> I suspect I am not the only one with logging problems to eQSL and LoTW.  
> Thanks to a hint from another ham on this forum, I can now trick TQSL into 
> uploading FT8 QSO’s.  I just heard from an eQSL support volunteer, who in 
> essence says that they are aware of the new mode, but are constrained by 
> ADIF.ORG.  I suspect LoTW has the same constraint but there is a workaround.  
> QRZ seems to be handling all this in stride.
>  
> What is the common practice now for eQSL?  I have on a few occasions, changed 
> the mode to SSB, but that brings issues too.  One is that signal reports 
> won’t match the mode.  All this will get sorted out in time but has anyone 
> come up with a better solution than mine?  At the moment I am just holding 
> off on sending FT8 QSO’s to eQSL.
>  
> Dan Malcolm
> K4SHQ
>  
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

[wsjt-devel] FT8 online logging

[Dan Malcolm]

I suspect I am not the only one with logging problems to eQSL and LoTW.
Thanks to a hint from another ham on this forum, I can now trick TQSL into
uploading FT8 QSO's.  I just heard from an eQSL support volunteer, who in
essence says that they are aware of the new mode, but are constrained by
ADIF.ORG.  I suspect LoTW has the same constraint but there is a workaround.
QRZ seems to be handling all this in stride.

 

What is the common practice now for eQSL?  I have on a few occasions,
changed the mode to SSB, but that brings issues too.  One is that signal
reports won't match the mode.  All this will get sorted out in time but has
anyone come up with a better solution than mine?  At the moment I am just
holding off on sending FT8 QSO's to eQSL.

 

Dan Malcolm

K4SHQ

 

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel