Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-31 Thread Bill Somerville
On 31/05/2015 13:13, Joe Taylor wrote:

Hi Joe,
> Suggestion: until SourceForge gets its email commit-notification fixed,
> it may be a good idea for us to send email to wsjt-devel when committing
> a change that might affect others.
I have raised a ticket at SF as this seems to be more than just a 
transient glitch.

https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/site-support/10440/

73
Bill
G4WJS.

--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-31 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Mike, Bill, and all,

> I think it is quite reasonable for developers and self building testers
> to have to make so internal adjustments while development code settles down.

I agree.

Suggestion: until SourceForge gets its email commit-notification fixed, 
it may be a good idea for us to send email to wsjt-devel when committing 
a change that might affect others.

-- Joe

--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-31 Thread Bill Somerville
On 31/05/2015 12:59, Michael Black wrote:

Hi Mike,
> How about putting some sort of rev# in the INI so that WSJT-X knows when it
> needs to update/change something in it?
> So..
> If (revnumber < XXX) {
>   MessageBox("Frequencies need to be reset");
>   If (ok) {
>  Reset freq...
>  Etc...
> Update rev
>   }
> }
I don't like this idea as it adds a whole new class of potential 
configuration bugs like the fact that your logic only deals with forward 
moves and not backward moves. It is fairly easy to make settings keys 
both forward and backwards compatible and in this case before any 
release I would change the key name which is better than any type of 
schema number.

I think it is quite reasonable for developers and self building testers 
to have to make so internal adjustments while development code settles down.

If you are really keen to not have to reset the frequency list at all I 
can change the key name every time the format or default content changes 
but to me it seems wasted effort that just clutters up all the 
developers settings files.
>
> This would cover the upgrade too.
>
> 73
> Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 6:50 AM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472
>
> Hi Josh, Steve --
>
> On 5/31/2015 1:24 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
>> Hmm. 80m is still not working after r5473 (fix for wrong frequency
> entries).
>
> After starting v1.6 r5473 you will need to (once) go to the Frequencies tab
> and hit the Reset button.
>
>   -- Joe


--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-31 Thread Michael Black
How about putting some sort of rev# in the INI so that WSJT-X knows when it
needs to update/change something in it?
So..
If (revnumber < XXX) {
 MessageBox("Frequencies need to be reset");
 If (ok) {
Reset freq...
Etc...
   Update rev
 }
}

This would cover the upgrade too.

73
Mike W9MDB

-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu] 
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2015 6:50 AM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

Hi Josh, Steve --

On 5/31/2015 1:24 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
> Hmm. 80m is still not working after r5473 (fix for wrong frequency
entries).

After starting v1.6 r5473 you will need to (once) go to the Frequencies tab
and hit the Reset button.

-- Joe


--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-31 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Josh, Steve --

On 5/31/2015 1:24 AM, Steven Franke wrote:
> Hmm. 80m is still not working after r5473 (fix for wrong frequency entries).

After starting v1.6 r5473 you will need to (once) go to the Frequencies 
tab and hit the Reset button.

-- Joe

--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-30 Thread Steven Franke
Hmm. 80m is still not working after r5473 (fix for wrong frequency entries). 

> On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 PM, Steven Franke  wrote:
> 
> I can confirm that it looks like 80m was “skipped” at 0302, even though it 
> was in my “Night” list. On the other hand, 160m and the other bands do seem 
> to “work”. 
> Steve k9an
> 
>> On May 30, 2015, at 8:46 PM, Josh Rovero  wrote:
>> 
>> I am noticing that the lowest band, 80m, that I have specified in night, 
>> sunrise, and tune slots is never being selected for either reception or 
>> transmission.
>> 
>> Josh Rovero
>> KK1D
>> 
>> --
>> ___
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> 
> 
> --
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-30 Thread Steven Franke
I can confirm that it looks like 80m was “skipped” at 0302, even though it was 
in my “Night” list. On the other hand, 160m and the other bands do seem to 
“work”. 
Steve k9an

> On May 30, 2015, at 8:46 PM, Josh Rovero  wrote:
> 
> I am noticing that the lowest band, 80m, that I have specified in night, 
> sunrise, and tune slots is never being selected for either reception or 
> transmission.
> 
> Josh Rovero
> KK1D
> 
> --
> ___
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


[wsjt-devel] Wsjt-x r5469 & r5472

2015-05-30 Thread Josh Rovero
I am noticing that the lowest band, 80m, that I have specified in night,
sunrise, and tune slots is never being selected for either reception or
transmission.

Josh Rovero
KK1D
--
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel