[wsjt-devel] jt65code, jt9code
Hi Bill, When you get a chance, could you modify CMakeLists.txt so that the executables jt65code[.exe] and jt9code[.exe] are once again built as part of the WSJT-X build procedure. These utility programs are described in the User Guide (currently in Section 14), so the executables should also be included in the distribution packages. Most users don't need them, but they help to document the JT65 and JT9 protocols. -- Joe, K1JT -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] jt65code, jt9code
On 05/09/2014 18:36, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Joe, > > When you get a chance, could you modify CMakeLists.txt so that the > executables jt65code[.exe] and jt9code[.exe] are once again built as > part of the WSJT-X build procedure. > > These utility programs are described in the User Guide (currently in > Section 14), so the executables should also be included in the > distribution packages. Most users don't need them, but they help to > document the JT65 and JT9 protocols. No problem, what about jt9sim ? > > -- Joe, K1JT 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] jt65code, jt9code
Hi Bill, > No problem, what about jt9sim ? No need to include jt9sim. It was (and might still be) useful to me for optimizing the JT9 decoder, but has little use for anyone else. -- Joe -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] jt65code, jt9code
On 05/09/2014 18:36, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Joe, > > When you get a chance, could you modify CMakeLists.txt so that the > executables jt65code[.exe] and jt9code[.exe] are once again built as > part of the WSJT-X build procedure. Done. > > These utility programs are described in the User Guide (currently in > Section 14), so the executables should also be included in the > distribution packages. Most users don't need them, but they help to > document the JT65 and JT9 protocols. > > -- Joe, K1JT 73 Bill G4WJS. -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
