[wtp-dev] Bug 220879 released to I-build

2008-02-29 Thread Tim deBoer
Hello,

The Web Services smoke test failed on this week's I-build 
(I20080229065303) due to a change in the Tomcat server tools. I have 
released a fix (bug 220879) to the build. If you have problems publishing 
to Tomcat, please wait for the next build. If not, the change is internal 
and will not invalidate your testing.

Thanks,
Tim deBoer
Eclipse WTP PMC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


RE: [wtp-dev] Bug 220879 released to I-build

2008-02-29 Thread Larry Isaacs
Thanks Tim,

The issue should only occur when deploying a module to a Tomcat server that has 
never been published.  If you publish the server without any modules first, you 
can avoid this issue.

Larry

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim deBoer
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 1:57 PM
To: wtp-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [wtp-dev] Bug 220879 released to I-build


Hello,

The Web Services smoke test failed on this week's I-build (I20080229065303) due 
to a change in the Tomcat server tools. I have released a fix (bug 220879) to 
the build. If you have problems publishing to Tomcat, please wait for the next 
build. If not, the change is internal and will not invalidate your testing.

Thanks,
Tim deBoer
Eclipse WTP PMC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


RE: [wtp-dev] Re: Java EE server adapter questions

2008-02-29 Thread Tim deBoer
Hi Rochelle, Mark,

Sorry, I must have missed the earlier note.

The generic server name can be somewhat misleading, but it's really just a 
specialized server adapter. It allows you to define the behaviour for a 
new server adapter through a simple xml file instead of coding in Java. It 
allows you to start using your server quickly, so you don't need to create 
a custom server adapter unless you need a high level of interaction or 
integration with your particular server.

If you only need to change the install location of your server, you should 
just be able to declare that your server uses the same wizard fragment out 
of the generic server framework. This should also provide a UI to change 
any of the other properties you've declared for your server. If you need 
to do more or customize it, you can provide your own fragment - and 
depending on the level of risk/time you'll accept you can write one from 
scratch, base on the internal one for now, or open an API request to 
expose the generic server one for customization.

By default, the Eclipse Console only shows errors (i.e. output to 
System.err) in red. You can customize the colour in the preferences, you 
may be able to switch your server to use System.out, or you can contact 
the platform UI team if you were interested in extending/modifying the 
console.

And yes, if you're going to EclipseCon you can corner us there as well!

Thanks,
Tim deBoer
Eclipse WTP PMC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



From:
Mark Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues. 
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
Date:
02/28/2008 04:30 AM
Subject:
RE: [wtp-dev] Re: Java EE server adapter questions



As a fellow WTP extender/investigator I found the same issue. There is
no tutorial on anything other than the basic generic server material
found at the website and in the WTP book.

The only reference for a non-generic server is the tomcat server adaptor
source code.

As for the difference in capabilities the simple answer is that a
generic server behaves as described elsewhere, whereas with a custom
server you can do anything you want. That is, using a custom server
adapter you can put any Java code you want.

Hope this helps, I held of from answering before because I thought
someone (from the WTP team) would have replied. I imagine they're
getting ready for eclipseCon next month, which incidentally is an ideal
place to grab them and ask these questions.

Ciao,

Mark Walker.
Technical Architect for Tools Avaya UK.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 February 2008 01:03
To: wtp-dev@eclipse.org
Subject: [wtp-dev] Re: Java EE server adapter questions

I never got a response to this, so trying once more.  If this is the
wrong alias, please point me at the correct one.

Thanks,
Rochelle

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm an Eclipse and WTP newbie, so please help me get started!
 
 I'm working on improving an existing Java EE server adapter which uses
 the generic server support.  I've also just read through the Adding 
 New Servers chapter of Eclipse Web Tools Platform: Developing Java(tm)
 Web Applications.
 
 My questions:
 1) Is there a document describing the types of things you can do with 
 a custom server vs. a generic one?  Is there a good tutorial on 
 writing a custom one?
 
 2) One of the things I was trying to do was improve the Missing 
 classpath entry message in the New Server dialog when pointing at a 
 location which was not really an installed server.  I found that the 
 Geronimo plugin does this in a WizardFragment subclass, but I'm not 
 clear on whether I need a custom adapter just for this or I can 
 provide a replacement WizardFragment for this.  And, if just a wizard 
 fragment, I see it is discouraged to subclass the built in 
 org.eclipse.jst.server.generic.ui.internal.GenericServerRuntimeWizardF
 ragment in internal packages... What is the best way to go about doing
 something like this?
 
 3) What's the best way to control the color of my server console text?
 Right now it's all red - shouldn't that only be for errors?
 
 I'm sure I'll have more questions later.
 
 Thanks!
 Rochelle
 
___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


[wtp-dev] Project meta data is out of date for webtools

2008-02-29 Thread portal on behalf of emo
Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the MyFoundation
Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were found
with this project's meta-data:

* The date for release WTP 2.0.2 is in the past, but the release is not
marked as completed. If it is completed, it should be marked as completed;
if it has been postponed, it should be given a new target date.
___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


[wtp-dev] Committer vote for Gary Karasiuk has concluded successfully

2008-02-29 Thread portal on behalf of Chuck Bridgham
webtools.common Committers,
This automatically generated message marks the successful completion of
voting for Gary Karasiuk to receive full Committer status on the
webtools.common project. The next step is for the PMC to approve this vote,
followed by the EMO processing the paperwork and provisioning the account.

Vote summary: 8/0/0 with 5 pending 
  +1  Carl Anderson
  +1  Chuck Bridgham
  +1  Kathy Chan
  +1  Nitin Dahyabhai
   ?  Naci Dai
  +1  Konstantin Komissarchik
   ?  John Lanuti
  +1  Lawrence Mandel
   ?  Peter Moogk
   ?  Kate Price
   ?  Craig Salter
  +1  Jason Sholl
  +1  David Williams

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
lead, PMC member, or the EMO [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev


Re: [wtp-dev] Project meta data is out of date for webtools

2008-02-29 Thread David M Williams
whew ... one minute after the release date ... those automated audit 
systems are ruthless :) 



From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (portal on behalf of emo)
To:
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
Date:
03/01/2008 12:01 AM
Subject:
[wtp-dev] Project meta data is out of date for webtools



Projects are required to keep meta data up to date using the MyFoundation
Portal (http://portal.eclipse.org/).  The following problems were found
with this project's meta-data:

* The date for release WTP 2.0.2 is in the past, but the release is not
marked as completed. If it is completed, it should be marked as completed;
if it has been postponed, it should be given a new target date.
___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev

___
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev