Željko Filipin wrote:
> I checked out Watir with TortoiseSVN and build a gem from revision
> 1142. But when I built the gem, it had name watir-1.5.1.1141.gem
> (revision number is not the same as the number in the gem name). Is
> that OK, or am I doing something wrong?
Watir actually gets its version number from the revision of the watir.rb
file. In your case it was last changed in 1141 and 1142 only affected
other files.
In other words, this is fine.
> I installed and executed tests while logged in as administrator. Ruby
> is ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i386-mswin32], IE is 7.
>
> >gem build watir.gemspec
> Successfully built RubyGem
> Name: watir
> Version: 1.5.1.1141
> File: watir-1.5.1.1141.gem
>
> Just to let you know, here are results of unit tests.
>
> core_tests.rb
>
> 1) Failure:
> test_exists(TC_IE_Exists)
> [C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/watir-1.5.1.1141/unitt
> ests/../unittests/ie_exists_test.rb:15]:
> is not true.
>
> 195 tests, 1083 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors
I have not seen this error before.
This looks like an IE7 bug in Watir. I've opened up this jira ticket:
http://jira.openqa.org/browse/WTR-138
> all_tests.rb
>
> 332 tests, 289 assertions, 5 failures, 277 errors
>
> I did not post output of all_test.rb because it is to verbose, I can
> send it if somebody wants to take a look.
There are many known problems here. I wrote up a general ticket to
remind us to clean this up.
http://jira.openqa.org/browse/WTR-137
Thank you very much for the reports.
Bret
___
Wtr-general mailing list
Wtr-general@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
