Re: [X2Go-User] Chrome speed with x2go

2019-10-17 Thread Oleksandr Shneyder
Hello Keith,

you should try KDrive option. Chrome should work way faster with it.
Especially on the fast networks. Also GL Applications and desktops like
modern Gnome and KDE are fully supported. Another advantage - KDrive
client will work without X Server on the client side on non-Linux platforms.
However, currently there is no KDrive client build for OSX, so first you
should try it with Linux client. If it'll work for you, you can try to
build X2Go KDrive Client for OS X. Alternatively, if your company has
enough resources, you could also sponsor the developing of X2Go KDrive
client for OSX, because at the moment OSX support is not on my priority
list.

regards,
Alex

Am 17.10.19 um 06:40 schrieb Keith Burns:
> Hello,
> 
> So many things I love about x2go over any other remote desktop solution,
> and I've pretty much tried them all in one flavour or another.
> 
> The one thing that is really hurting me though is Chrome / webkit speed.
> The issue has been discussed here before a long time ago, but I didn't
> see much by way of resolution.
> 
> This is now I suspect impacting electron based apps, which are becoming
> more prolific.
> 
> Bouncing between my client OS and Linux isn't desirable, and in some
> cases isn't possible.
> 
> The Linux desktop is on a 200/20Mb connection with ~20ms or less RTT,
> which means I get screen updates from the server -> 20Mb -> client as
> the server is leveraging the upload speed to communicate back to the client.
> 
> I would imagine that 20Mb is sufficient to handle pretty much any of the
> encoding settings, so I am happy to try any settings.
> 
> Server: Ubuntu MATE 18.04, installed using apt packages. (4.1.0.3 ?)
> Client: OSX 4.1.2.1
> 
> I'm a software developer so I am comfortable building from source,
> administering my own machine, so happy to experiment to try and get, if
> not resolution, at least a configuration that gets the best performance
> possible.
> 
> Cheers
> Keith.
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> x2go-user mailing list
> x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
> https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
> 


-- 
---
Oleksandr Shneyder| Email: o.shney...@phoca-gmbh.de
phoca GmbH| Tel. : 0911 - 14870374 0
Schleiermacherstr. 2  | Fax. : 0911 - 14870374 9
D-90491 Nürnberg  | Mobil: 0163 - 49 64 461

Geschäftsführung: Dipl.-Inf. Oleksandr Shneyder

Amtsgericht München   | http://www.phoca-gmbh.de
HRB 196 658   | http://www.x2go.org
USt-IdNr.: DE281977973
---



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
x2go-user mailing list
x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user


Re: [X2Go-User] Chrome speed with x2go

2019-10-17 Thread Ulrich Sibiller
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:40 PM Keith Burns  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> So many things I love about x2go over any other remote desktop solution, and 
> I've pretty much tried them all in one flavour or another.
>
> The one thing that is really hurting me though is Chrome / webkit speed. The 
> issue has been discussed here before a long time ago, but I didn't see much 
> by way of resolution.
>
> This is now I suspect impacting electron based apps, which are becoming more 
> prolific.
>
> Bouncing between my client OS and Linux isn't desirable, and in some cases 
> isn't possible.
>
> The Linux desktop is on a 200/20Mb connection with ~20ms or less RTT, which 
> means I get screen updates from the server -> 20Mb -> client as the server is 
> leveraging the upload speed to communicate back to the client.
>
> I would imagine that 20Mb is sufficient to handle pretty much any of the 
> encoding settings, so I am happy to try any settings.

Well, the problem is Chrome not using the Xlib API but rendering stuff
itself and pushing images over the line. Have you tested this?:
https://wiki.x2go.org/doku.php/wiki:development:glx-xlib-workaround
(use this description to build the latest version with llvm, which is
the fastest sw-rendering solution:
https://www.mesa3d.org/llvmpipe.html)

Regarding the compression stuff: I have written an overview about the
compression options here:
https://github.com/ArcticaProject/nx-libs/issues/802

Uli



>
> Server: Ubuntu MATE 18.04, installed using apt packages. (4.1.0.3 ?)
> Client: OSX 4.1.2.1
>
> I'm a software developer so I am comfortable building from source, 
> administering my own machine, so happy to experiment to try and get, if not 
> resolution, at least a configuration that gets the best performance possible.
>
> Cheers
> Keith.
>
>
> ___
> x2go-user mailing list
> x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
> https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
___
x2go-user mailing list
x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user