Re: [Xastir] A rant on the shapefiles...

2008-04-09 Thread Brad Douglas
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 08:30 -0700, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:
> 
> > I am wondering who participated in getting these maps made? Was it state,
> > county, feds?
> 
> Blame the census takers.  Feds.  Federalies.  Men in black?
> 
> For the purpose of taking the every-10-year federal census they've
> kept track of roads.  Unfortunately the census-takers haven't had
> any cartography training (hey, it's really not their job, right?).
> The maps were not intended to be used for the purposes people put
> them to.  That philosophy is changing a bit lately and they're
> trying to do a better job on the data.  I suspect Gerry or Tom can
> fill us in on the details, but that's my vague recollection.

Let's not forget the fact that "cartographic data" (ie. street data) was
never a goal of the Census.  It simply fell out of the LineFile format
due to their need to track data at the block and tract levels.  It was
literally an afterthought.

Of course, since then, geographers have been using it to extract roads
and other features and have increasingly put pressure on the Census to
make this a real part of the Census and not a byproduct.  As a result,
the Census began releasing periodic updates every few years with
cartographic updates.  It wasn't great, but it was better than nothing.

They are finally getting serious about it and storing the geographic
referenced data is well known formats.  Hopefully, they'll start working
on the accuracy of that data...


-- 
73, de Brad KB8UYR/6 

___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir


Re: [Xastir] A rant on the shapefiles...

2008-04-09 Thread Gerry Creager
Curt did such a nice job of summarizing what I could have said in 10k 
words  gerry


Curt, WE7U wrote:

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:


I am wondering who participated in getting these maps made? Was it state,
county, feds?


Blame the census takers.  Feds.  Federalies.  Men in black?

For the purpose of taking the every-10-year federal census they've
kept track of roads.  Unfortunately the census-takers haven't had
any cartography training (hey, it's really not their job, right?).
The maps were not intended to be used for the purposes people put
them to.  That philosophy is changing a bit lately and they're
trying to do a better job on the data.  I suspect Gerry or Tom can
fill us in on the details, but that's my vague recollection.

Even with that less than stellar cartography start, they're awfully
nice road maps, and free.  Hard to beat that in most other
countries!

Many of the commercial mapping programs start with Tiger data as
their base and add to/correct it.



--
Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.862.3982 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843

___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir


Re: [Xastir] A rant on the shapefiles...

2008-04-09 Thread Richard Polivka, N6NKO
I have to agree that they are a start and people use them for more than 
what the initial intent was.


That is why I have taken to editing what I have so the maps I have will 
be more useful. I am finding that even the maps issued by the cities and 
county here are inaccurate as well, missing important info such as local 
parks, creeks, etc.


Now to go and walk around a bit - can't sit too long. Plus the dog is 
dreaming.


73 from 807,

Richard, N6NKO


Curt, WE7U wrote:

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:

  

I am wondering who participated in getting these maps made? Was it state,
county, feds?



Blame the census takers.  Feds.  Federalies.  Men in black?

For the purpose of taking the every-10-year federal census they've
kept track of roads.  Unfortunately the census-takers haven't had
any cartography training (hey, it's really not their job, right?).
The maps were not intended to be used for the purposes people put
them to.  That philosophy is changing a bit lately and they're
trying to do a better job on the data.  I suspect Gerry or Tom can
fill us in on the details, but that's my vague recollection.

Even with that less than stellar cartography start, they're awfully
nice road maps, and free.  Hard to beat that in most other
countries!

Many of the commercial mapping programs start with Tiger data as
their base and add to/correct it.

  

___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir


Re: [Xastir] A rant on the shapefiles...

2008-04-09 Thread Curt, WE7U
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:

> I am wondering who participated in getting these maps made? Was it state,
> county, feds?

Blame the census takers.  Feds.  Federalies.  Men in black?

For the purpose of taking the every-10-year federal census they've
kept track of roads.  Unfortunately the census-takers haven't had
any cartography training (hey, it's really not their job, right?).
The maps were not intended to be used for the purposes people put
them to.  That philosophy is changing a bit lately and they're
trying to do a better job on the data.  I suspect Gerry or Tom can
fill us in on the details, but that's my vague recollection.

Even with that less than stellar cartography start, they're awfully
nice road maps, and free.  Hard to beat that in most other
countries!

Many of the commercial mapping programs start with Tiger data as
their base and add to/correct it.

-- 
Curt, WE7U. archer at eskimo dot com
http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
  Lotto:  A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown
Windows:  Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U.
The world DOES revolve around me:  I picked the coordinate system!"
___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir


[Xastir] A rant on the shapefiles...

2008-04-09 Thread Richard Polivka, N6NKO
I have to thank the authors/contributors to Quantum GIS. This program is 
proving to be quite useful in editing the TIGER 2007 FE shapefiles. 
There is s much missing from Milwaukee county, it is unbelievable. I 
am just using it on my laptop but I can see where BigBox with its three 
eyes can be an asset to this.


I am wondering who participated in getting these maps made? Was it 
state, county, feds? It really does not matter, I am laid up with a flu 
bug so I have been playing to keep from going wacky. I am not one who 
likes being ill but the legs just don't want to cooperate too long walking.


Mr. Creager - I realize that you have offered to be a repository of the 
shapefiles. How about making a subdirectory "contributed" where we, as a 
group, can put in updated shapefiles as they are cleaned up, augmented, 
whatever? The feds have supplied the basics, now we have an opportunity 
to make the products USEFUL.


73 from 807,

Richard, N6NKO

P.S.: Dreaming of qty 4 of 21" 1280x1024 flatpanel monitors on BigBox
___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir