Re: xbean 3.5 release?
On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:04 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for the response Jacek. If nobody objects, I'll go ahead and create a release candidate now. However, I am sensitive to the fact that I have not been contributing directly to this subproject ... so if somebody would rather do the release instead of me then please, don't be shy and speak up. In the event that nobody objects; I have some questions: It appears the the maven release process has been used in the past to release directly from trunk without creating a branch. Is that correct? I also notice that there is no dependency on genesis and comments to the effect that this is desired. So, I will keep things as-is. Also, as the current snapshot is 3.5-SNAPSHOT the new release will be 3.5. I assume this is desired. I ask because I noticed that the previous three releases were 3.4.x and I don't personally know if the changes that have been integrated are considered sufficient to bump the release to 3.5. Anything else that I should be aware of? I don't recall if I fixed this and it isn't really essential for a release but we should make sure unique snapshots are turned off to not clutter up apache snapshots repo. I'd go for 3.5. thanks david jencks Thanks, Joe Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: What is the status of the asm shading issue? Can we pursue a release yet? Go with it. If I don't finish it before the release goes out it's to be included in the next one. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21625992.html Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: xbean 3.5 release?
What is the status of the asm shading issue? Can we pursue a release yet? Thanks, Joe Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: >> >> So can somebody push a release for 3.5? Are there active issues that >> need to >> be resolved prior to a 3.5 release (I've seen some Geronimo JIRAs that >> might >> be xbean issues)? > > Wait a bit until I get the asm shading issue sorted out. It's not been > reported yet, and am doing it now how to work it around. > > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21567629.html Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: xbean 3.5 release?
So can somebody push a release for 3.5? Are there active issues that need to be resolved prior to a 3.5 release (I've seen some Geronimo JIRAs that might be xbean issues)? If nobody volunteers to push a 3.5 release I guess that I could do it given that I am a committer on Geronimo. However, it seems inappropriate given that I haven't been contributing to xbean directly but I'll do it if you want me to (or if nobody else volunteers). We need to get this going ASAP for our Geronimo 2.2 plans. Thanks, Joe gnodet wrote: > > Sounds good to me. > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: >> >> As many of you already know from the Geronimo dev list - we're looking to >> release Geronimo 2.2 by mid January. However, we need a number of >> snapshots >> released prior to that and xBean trunk (3.5-SNAPSHOT) is among them for >> xbean-finder, xbean-naming, and xbean-reflect. Any possibility we could >> get >> an xBean 3.5 release within the next few weeks? >> >> Thanks, >> Joe >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p20795885.html >> Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/xbean-3.5-release--tp20795885p21312341.html Sent from the xbean-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
