Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2017-02-20 Thread Jan Blunck
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
>> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit :
>> > > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
>> > So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting
>> > for review of xen-devel to the spec.
>> >
>> > And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0
>> > parts of code in DPDK.
>>
>> Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interesting to share
>> it with DPDK community too.
>
> Joao, would it be possible to include an tarball of the patches? I know
> they are no in the right state with the review of the staging
> grants API - they are incompatible, but it may help folks to get
> a feel for what DPDK APIs you used?
>
> Staging grants API:
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-12/msg01878.html
>

The topic of the grants API is unrelated to the dom0 memory pool. The
memory pool which uses xen_create_contiguous_region() is used in cases
we know that there are no hugepages available.

Joao and I met in Dublin and I whined about not being able to call
into the grants API from userspace and instead need to kick a kernel
driver to do the work for every burst. It would be great if that could
change in the future.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2017-02-16 Thread Jan Blunck
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>
>> Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK?
>>
>> I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community.
>> Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not
>> fixed yet:
>>   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html
>>   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html
>>
>> The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks:
>>   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html
>>
>> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
>
> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting
> for review of xen-devel to the spec.
>
> And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0
> parts of code in DPDK.

FWIW I've also tested the 16.11 code in a Xen PV domU with uses the
xen_dom0 module due to the lack of hugepages.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel