Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3.4 000/172] 3.4.108-rc1 review
On 2015/6/16 23:13, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 16:33 +0800, l...@kernel.org wrote: >> From: Zefan Li >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.108 release. >> There are 172 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Thu Jun 18 08:30:58 UTC 2015. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. > > Would it be possible to also include 31a418986a58 "xen: netback: read > hotplug script once at start of day." which has started trickling into > other stable branches already, please. > > If not now then for 109. > Queued up for 3.4.108. :) ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [stable] config: Enable NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE by default when SWIOTLB is selected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2015/5/25 8:56, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This fix appears to be needed in all stable branches: > > commit a6dfa128ce5c414ab46b1d690f7a1b8decb8526d > Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Date: Fri Apr 17 15:04:48 2015 -0400 > > config: Enable NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE by default when SWIOTLB is selected > > For 3.2 and 3.4, the context needs to be fixed up. > > For 2.6.32, a similar change to config conditions should be made at line > 93 of arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h. > Queued up for 3.4. Thanks! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlV+SfgACgkQWyV2+h1UztObPACgnpXLidQTbWaJ3oXGZ3h0gBAQ L+UAnj8u4GN07Ly7NtENWMUEqYTo/yz5 =Kple -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] "don't bugger nd->seq" seems to break umount sometimes
>>> Is there going to be a 3.4.108 with a fix for this? >>> >> >> definitely. > > Great. Do you have a timeline in mind? > Yeah, probably in early June. > We have a daily automated test which has been hitting this issue for a > while, I can continue to ignore the associated cron spam of course ;-) > :) ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] "don't bugger nd->seq" seems to break umount sometimes
On 2015/5/19 16:33, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 09:15 +0800, Zefan Li wrote: >> On 2015/4/29 20:21, Al Viro wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:45:45PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> >>>> The symptoms are that `umount' fails with EBUSY, >>> >>> [lizf: Backported to 3.4: >>> - remove the changes to follow_link() as it doesn't call set_root()] >>> >>> looks dubious - I don't have -stable in front of me, but set_root() in >>> follow_link() had migrated from __vfs_follow_link(), so could you try >>> (tr '#' '\t' | ed fs/namei.c) <<'EOF' >>> /__vfs_follow_link/ >>> /set_root/s/^/#/ >>> i >>> ##if (!nd->root.mnt) >>> . >>> wq >>> EOF >>> and see if it helps? >>> . >>> >> >> My fault. I just checked 3.2.y, and it made the right change. > > Is there going to be a 3.4.108 with a fix for this? > definitely. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] "don't bugger nd->seq" seems to break umount sometimes
On 2015/4/29 20:21, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:45:45PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> The symptoms are that `umount' fails with EBUSY, > > [lizf: Backported to 3.4: > - remove the changes to follow_link() as it doesn't call set_root()] > > looks dubious - I don't have -stable in front of me, but set_root() in > follow_link() had migrated from __vfs_follow_link(), so could you try > (tr '#' '\t' | ed fs/namei.c) <<'EOF' > /__vfs_follow_link/ > /set_root/s/^/#/ > i > ##if (!nd->root.mnt) > . > wq > EOF > and see if it helps? > . > My fault. I just checked 3.2.y, and it made the right change. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
