Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: don't inclide rwlock.h directly.1~B
On 10/05/2017 03:58 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h >> should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build. >> >> Cc: Stefano Stabellini >> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org >> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org >> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini Applied to for-linus-4.14c. -boris ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: don't inclide rwlock.h directly.1~B
On 2017-10-05 12:58:32 [-0700], Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Let me know if you want this patch to go via the xen tree. Yes, please. Sebastian ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] arm/xen: don't inclide rwlock.h directly.1~B
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > rwlock.h should not be included directly. Instead linux/splinlock.h > should be included. One thing it does is to break the RT build. > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini > Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini Let me know if you want this patch to go via the xen tree. > --- > arch/arm/xen/p2m.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c > index e71eefa2e427..0641ba54ab62 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/p2m.c > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > -- > 2.14.2 > ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel