[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/tboot: simplify DMAR table copying
There's no need for more than one variable, no need for casts, and no point in using the type-safe xmalloc_array() here. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c @@ -435,13 +435,12 @@ int __init tboot_protect_mem_regions(voi int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler) { -struct acpi_table_header *dmar_table; int rc; uint64_t size; uint32_t dmar_table_length; unsigned long pa; sinit_mle_data_t sinit_mle_data; -unsigned char *dmar_table_raw; +void *dmar_table; if ( !tboot_in_measured_env() ) return acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_DMAR, dmar_handler); @@ -474,13 +473,12 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_t tboot_copy_memory((unsigned char *)&dmar_table_length, sizeof(dmar_table_length), pa + sizeof(char) * ACPI_NAME_SIZE); -dmar_table_raw = xmalloc_array(unsigned char, dmar_table_length); -tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table_raw, dmar_table_length, pa); -dmar_table = (struct acpi_table_header *)dmar_table_raw; +dmar_table = xmalloc_bytes(dmar_table_length); +tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table, dmar_table_length, pa); __set_fixmap(FIX_TBOOT_MAP_ADDRESS, 0, 0); rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table); -xfree(dmar_table_raw); +xfree(dmar_table); /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */ /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */ x86/tboot: simplify DMAR table copying There's no need for more than one variable, no need for casts, and no point in using the type-safe xmalloc_array() here. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c @@ -435,13 +435,12 @@ int __init tboot_protect_mem_regions(voi int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler) { -struct acpi_table_header *dmar_table; int rc; uint64_t size; uint32_t dmar_table_length; unsigned long pa; sinit_mle_data_t sinit_mle_data; -unsigned char *dmar_table_raw; +void *dmar_table; if ( !tboot_in_measured_env() ) return acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_DMAR, dmar_handler); @@ -474,13 +473,12 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_t tboot_copy_memory((unsigned char *)&dmar_table_length, sizeof(dmar_table_length), pa + sizeof(char) * ACPI_NAME_SIZE); -dmar_table_raw = xmalloc_array(unsigned char, dmar_table_length); -tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table_raw, dmar_table_length, pa); -dmar_table = (struct acpi_table_header *)dmar_table_raw; +dmar_table = xmalloc_bytes(dmar_table_length); +tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table, dmar_table_length, pa); __set_fixmap(FIX_TBOOT_MAP_ADDRESS, 0, 0); rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table); -xfree(dmar_table_raw); +xfree(dmar_table); /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */ /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */ ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/tboot: simplify DMAR table copying
On 18/02/15 09:03, Jan Beulich wrote: > There's no need for more than one variable, no need for casts, and no > point in using the type-safe xmalloc_array() here. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c > @@ -435,13 +435,12 @@ int __init tboot_protect_mem_regions(voi > > int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler) > { > -struct acpi_table_header *dmar_table; > int rc; > uint64_t size; > uint32_t dmar_table_length; > unsigned long pa; > sinit_mle_data_t sinit_mle_data; > -unsigned char *dmar_table_raw; > +void *dmar_table; > > if ( !tboot_in_measured_env() ) > return acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_DMAR, dmar_handler); > @@ -474,13 +473,12 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_t > tboot_copy_memory((unsigned char *)&dmar_table_length, >sizeof(dmar_table_length), >pa + sizeof(char) * ACPI_NAME_SIZE); > -dmar_table_raw = xmalloc_array(unsigned char, dmar_table_length); > -tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table_raw, dmar_table_length, pa); > -dmar_table = (struct acpi_table_header *)dmar_table_raw; > +dmar_table = xmalloc_bytes(dmar_table_length); > +tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table, dmar_table_length, pa); > __set_fixmap(FIX_TBOOT_MAP_ADDRESS, 0, 0); > > rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table); > -xfree(dmar_table_raw); > +xfree(dmar_table); > > /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */ > /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */ > > > ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/tboot: simplify DMAR table copying
OnĀ Feb 18, 2015 17:03, Jan Beulich wrote: > There's no need for more than one variable, no need for casts, and no > point in using the type-safe xmalloc_array() here. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/tboot.c > @@ -435,13 +435,12 @@ int __init tboot_protect_mem_regions(voi > > int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_table_handler dmar_handler) { > -struct acpi_table_header *dmar_table; > int rc; > uint64_t size; > uint32_t dmar_table_length; > unsigned long pa; > sinit_mle_data_t sinit_mle_data; > -unsigned char *dmar_table_raw; > +void *dmar_table; > > if ( !tboot_in_measured_env() ) > return acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_DMAR, dmar_handler); @@ - > 474,13 +473,12 @@ int __init tboot_parse_dmar_table(acpi_t > tboot_copy_memory((unsigned char *)&dmar_table_length, >sizeof(dmar_table_length), >pa + sizeof(char) * ACPI_NAME_SIZE); > -dmar_table_raw = xmalloc_array(unsigned char, dmar_table_length); > -tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table_raw, dmar_table_length, pa); > -dmar_table = (struct acpi_table_header *)dmar_table_raw; > +dmar_table = xmalloc_bytes(dmar_table_length); > +tboot_copy_memory(dmar_table, dmar_table_length, pa); > __set_fixmap(FIX_TBOOT_MAP_ADDRESS, 0, 0); > > rc = dmar_handler(dmar_table); > -xfree(dmar_table_raw); > +xfree(dmar_table); > > /* acpi_parse_dmar() zaps APCI DMAR signature in TXT heap table */ > /* but dom0 will read real table, so must zap it there too */ > Ack. Jimmy ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel