Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] xen/MSI-X: really enforce alignment

2015-06-16 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The way the generic infrastructure works the intention of not allowing
> unaligned accesses can't be achieved by simply setting .unaligned to
> false. The benefit is that we can now replace the conditionals in
> {get,set}_entry_value() by assert()-s.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich 

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini 


> --- a/qemu/upstream/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c
> +++ b/qemu/upstream/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c
> @@ -421,16 +421,14 @@ int xen_pt_msix_update_remap(XenPCIPasst
>  
>  static uint32_t get_entry_value(XenPTMSIXEntry *e, int offset)
>  {
> -return !(offset % sizeof(*e->latch))
> -   ? e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] : 0;
> +assert(!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)));
> +return e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)];
>  }
>  
>  static void set_entry_value(XenPTMSIXEntry *e, int offset, uint32_t val)
>  {
> -if (!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)))
> -{
> -e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] = val;
> -}
> +assert(!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)));
> +e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] = val;
>  }
>  
>  static void pci_msix_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> @@ -496,6 +494,12 @@ static uint64_t pci_msix_read(void *opaq
>  }
>  }
>  
> +static bool pci_msix_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> + unsigned size, bool is_write)
> +{
> +return !(addr & (size - 1));
> +}
> +
>  static const MemoryRegionOps pci_msix_ops = {
>  .read = pci_msix_read,
>  .write = pci_msix_write,
> @@ -504,7 +508,13 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps pci_msix_op
>  .min_access_size = 4,
>  .max_access_size = 4,
>  .unaligned = false,
> +.accepts = pci_msix_accepts
>  },
> +.impl = {
> +.min_access_size = 4,
> +.max_access_size = 4,
> +.unaligned = false
> +}
>  };
>  
>  int xen_pt_msix_init(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, uint32_t base)
> 
> 
> 
> 

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] xen/MSI-X: really enforce alignment

2015-06-05 Thread Jan Beulich
The way the generic infrastructure works the intention of not allowing
unaligned accesses can't be achieved by simply setting .unaligned to
false. The benefit is that we can now replace the conditionals in
{get,set}_entry_value() by assert()-s.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich 

--- a/qemu/upstream/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c
+++ b/qemu/upstream/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c
@@ -421,16 +421,14 @@ int xen_pt_msix_update_remap(XenPCIPasst
 
 static uint32_t get_entry_value(XenPTMSIXEntry *e, int offset)
 {
-return !(offset % sizeof(*e->latch))
-   ? e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] : 0;
+assert(!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)));
+return e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)];
 }
 
 static void set_entry_value(XenPTMSIXEntry *e, int offset, uint32_t val)
 {
-if (!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)))
-{
-e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] = val;
-}
+assert(!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)));
+e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] = val;
 }
 
 static void pci_msix_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
@@ -496,6 +494,12 @@ static uint64_t pci_msix_read(void *opaq
 }
 }
 
+static bool pci_msix_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
+ unsigned size, bool is_write)
+{
+return !(addr & (size - 1));
+}
+
 static const MemoryRegionOps pci_msix_ops = {
 .read = pci_msix_read,
 .write = pci_msix_write,
@@ -504,7 +508,13 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps pci_msix_op
 .min_access_size = 4,
 .max_access_size = 4,
 .unaligned = false,
+.accepts = pci_msix_accepts
 },
+.impl = {
+.min_access_size = 4,
+.max_access_size = 4,
+.unaligned = false
+}
 };
 
 int xen_pt_msix_init(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, uint32_t base)



xen/MSI-X: really enforce alignment

The way the generic infrastructure works the intention of not allowing
unaligned accesses can't be achieved by simply setting .unaligned to
false. The benefit is that we can now replace the conditionals in
{get,set}_entry_value() by assert()-s.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich 

--- a/qemu/upstream/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c
+++ b/qemu/upstream/hw/xen/xen_pt_msi.c
@@ -421,16 +421,14 @@ int xen_pt_msix_update_remap(XenPCIPasst
 
 static uint32_t get_entry_value(XenPTMSIXEntry *e, int offset)
 {
-return !(offset % sizeof(*e->latch))
-   ? e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] : 0;
+assert(!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)));
+return e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)];
 }
 
 static void set_entry_value(XenPTMSIXEntry *e, int offset, uint32_t val)
 {
-if (!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)))
-{
-e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] = val;
-}
+assert(!(offset % sizeof(*e->latch)));
+e->latch[offset / sizeof(*e->latch)] = val;
 }
 
 static void pci_msix_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
@@ -496,6 +494,12 @@ static uint64_t pci_msix_read(void *opaq
 }
 }
 
+static bool pci_msix_accepts(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
+ unsigned size, bool is_write)
+{
+return !(addr & (size - 1));
+}
+
 static const MemoryRegionOps pci_msix_ops = {
 .read = pci_msix_read,
 .write = pci_msix_write,
@@ -504,7 +508,13 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps pci_msix_op
 .min_access_size = 4,
 .max_access_size = 4,
 .unaligned = false,
+.accepts = pci_msix_accepts
 },
+.impl = {
+.min_access_size = 4,
+.max_access_size = 4,
+.unaligned = false
+}
 };
 
 int xen_pt_msix_init(XenPCIPassthroughState *s, uint32_t base)
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel