Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send to unaware frontends

2016-10-07 Thread Paul Durrant
> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:da...@davemloft.net]
> Sent: 07 October 2016 06:38
> To: Paul Durrant 
> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu
> 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send
> to unaware frontends
> 
> From: Paul Durrant 
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:47:10 +0100
> 
> > In the case when a frontend only negotiates a single queue with xen-
> > netback it is possible for a skbuff with a s/w hash to result in a
> > hash extra_info segment being sent to the frontend even when no hash
> > algorithm has been configured. (The ndo_select_queue() entry point
> > makes sure the hash is not set if no algorithm is configured, but this
> > entry point is not called when there is only a single queue). This can
> > result in a frontend that isunable to handle extra_info segments being
> > given such a segment, causing it to crash.
> >
> > This patch fixes the problem by gating whether the extra_info is sent
> > not only on the presence of a s/w hash, but also on whether the hash
> > algorithm has been configured.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant 
> > Cc: Wei Liu 
> 
> This doesn't apply cleanly to the current 'net' tree, please respin.
> 

Sure. V2 coming.

  Paul

> Thanks.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send to unaware frontends

2016-10-06 Thread David Miller
From: Paul Durrant 
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 15:47:10 +0100

> In the case when a frontend only negotiates a single queue with xen-
> netback it is possible for a skbuff with a s/w hash to result in a
> hash extra_info segment being sent to the frontend even when no hash
> algorithm has been configured. (The ndo_select_queue() entry point makes
> sure the hash is not set if no algorithm is configured, but this entry
> point is not called when there is only a single queue). This can result
> in a frontend that isunable to handle extra_info segments being given
> such a segment, causing it to crash.
> 
> This patch fixes the problem by gating whether the extra_info is sent
> not only on the presence of a s/w hash, but also on whether the hash
> algorithm has been configured.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant 
> Cc: Wei Liu 

This doesn't apply cleanly to the current 'net' tree, please respin.

Thanks.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] [PATCH net] xen-netback: make sure that hashes are not send to unaware frontends

2016-10-06 Thread Paul Durrant
In the case when a frontend only negotiates a single queue with xen-
netback it is possible for a skbuff with a s/w hash to result in a
hash extra_info segment being sent to the frontend even when no hash
algorithm has been configured. (The ndo_select_queue() entry point makes
sure the hash is not set if no algorithm is configured, but this entry
point is not called when there is only a single queue). This can result
in a frontend that isunable to handle extra_info segments being given
such a segment, causing it to crash.

This patch fixes the problem by gating whether the extra_info is sent
not only on the presence of a s/w hash, but also on whether the hash
algorithm has been configured.

Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant 
Cc: Wei Liu 
---
 drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c | 13 ++---
 drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c   | 23 ++-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c 
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
index fb50c6d..1034139 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c
@@ -149,17 +149,8 @@ static u16 xenvif_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, 
struct sk_buff *skb,
struct xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev);
unsigned int size = vif->hash.size;
 
-   if (vif->hash.alg == XEN_NETIF_CTRL_HASH_ALGORITHM_NONE) {
-   u16 index = fallback(dev, skb) % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
-
-   /* Make sure there is no hash information in the socket
-* buffer otherwise it would be incorrectly forwarded
-* to the frontend.
-*/
-   skb_clear_hash(skb);
-
-   return index;
-   }
+   if (vif->hash.alg == XEN_NETIF_CTRL_HASH_ALGORITHM_NONE)
+   return fallback(dev, skb) % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
 
xenvif_set_skb_hash(vif, skb);
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c 
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index 3d0c989..2cd4a8e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -168,6 +168,10 @@ static bool xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available(struct 
xenvif_queue *queue)
needed = DIV_ROUND_UP(skb->len, XEN_PAGE_SIZE);
if (skb_is_gso(skb))
needed++;
+   /* Assume the frontend is capable of handling the hash
+* extra_info at this point. This will only ever lead to an
+* accurate value or over-estimation.
+*/
if (skb->sw_hash)
needed++;
 
@@ -378,9 +382,8 @@ static void xenvif_gop_frag_copy(struct xenvif_queue 
*queue, struct sk_buff *skb
.npo = npo,
.head = *head,
.gso_type = XEN_NETIF_GSO_TYPE_NONE,
-   /* xenvif_set_skb_hash() will have either set a s/w
-* hash or cleared the hash depending on
-* whether the the frontend wants a hash for this skb.
+   /* xenvif_rx_action() will have cleared any hash if
+* the frontend is not capable of handling it.
 */
.hash_present = skb->sw_hash,
};
@@ -593,6 +596,14 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif_queue *queue)
   && (skb = xenvif_rx_dequeue(queue)) != NULL) {
queue->last_rx_time = jiffies;
 
+   /* If there is no hash algorithm configured make sure
+* there is no hash information in the socket buffer
+* otherwise it would be incorrectly forwarded to the
+* frontend.
+*/
+   if (vif->hash.alg == XEN_NETIF_CTRL_HASH_ALGORITHM_NONE)
+   skb_clear_hash(skb);
+
XENVIF_RX_CB(skb)->meta_slots_used = xenvif_gop_skb(skb, &npo, 
queue);
 
__skb_queue_tail(&rxq, skb);
@@ -667,12 +678,6 @@ static void xenvif_rx_action(struct xenvif_queue *queue)
}
 
if (skb->sw_hash) {
-   /* Since the skb got here via xenvif_select_queue()
-* we know that the hash has been re-calculated
-* according to a configuration set by the frontend
-* and therefore we know that it is legitimate to
-* pass it to the frontend.
-*/
if (resp->flags & XEN_NETRXF_extra_info)
extra->flags |= XEN_NETIF_EXTRA_FLAG_MORE;
else
-- 
2.1.4


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel