Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen: fix HYPERVISOR_dm_op() prototype

2017-06-06 Thread Sergey Dyasli
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 02:03 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 05.06.17 at 10:41,  wrote:
> > 
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> 
> Why?
> 
> > @@ -474,7 +475,7 @@ HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op(unsigned int op, void *arg)
> >  
> >  static inline int
> >  HYPERVISOR_dm_op(
> > -   domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, void *bufs)
> > +   domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs)
> 
> All you need above here is a forward declaration of the structure.
> We should really avoid forcing source files to include all sorts of
> headers without actually needing anything from them.

Thank you for the good suggestion. I will fix this in v2.

> 
> > --- a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> > +++ b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> 
> Same here.
> 
> > @@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ int HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(int cmd, void *arg);
> >  int HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(int cmd, int vcpuid, void *extra_args);
> >  int HYPERVISOR_tmem_op(void *arg);
> >  int HYPERVISOR_vm_assist(unsigned int cmd, unsigned int type);
> > -int HYPERVISOR_dm_op(domid_t domid, unsigned int nr_bufs, void *bufs);
> > +int HYPERVISOR_dm_op(domid_t domid, unsigned int nr_bufs,
> > +struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs);
> 
> How come you get away with changing a declaration without
> also changing the matching definition?

The definition of HYPERVISOR_dm_op() is in arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S

-- 
Thanks,
Sergey
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen: fix HYPERVISOR_dm_op() prototype

2017-06-06 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 05.06.17 at 10:41,  wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 

Why?

> @@ -474,7 +475,7 @@ HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op(unsigned int op, void *arg)
>  
>  static inline int
>  HYPERVISOR_dm_op(
> - domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, void *bufs)
> + domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs)

All you need above here is a forward declaration of the structure.
We should really avoid forcing source files to include all sorts of
headers without actually needing anything from them.

> --- a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> +++ b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 

Same here.

> @@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ int HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(int cmd, void *arg);
>  int HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(int cmd, int vcpuid, void *extra_args);
>  int HYPERVISOR_tmem_op(void *arg);
>  int HYPERVISOR_vm_assist(unsigned int cmd, unsigned int type);
> -int HYPERVISOR_dm_op(domid_t domid, unsigned int nr_bufs, void *bufs);
> +int HYPERVISOR_dm_op(domid_t domid, unsigned int nr_bufs,
> +  struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs);

How come you get away with changing a declaration without
also changing the matching definition?

Jan


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen: fix HYPERVISOR_dm_op() prototype

2017-06-05 Thread Sergey Dyasli
Change the third parameter to be the required struct xen_dm_op_buf *
instead of a generic void * (which blindly accepts any pointer).

Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 3 ++-
 include/xen/arm/hypercall.h  | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h 
b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
index f6d20f6cca12..e111ae874647 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 /*
  * The hypercall asms have to meet several constraints:
@@ -474,7 +475,7 @@ HYPERVISOR_xenpmu_op(unsigned int op, void *arg)
 
 static inline int
 HYPERVISOR_dm_op(
-   domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, void *bufs)
+   domid_t dom, unsigned int nr_bufs, struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs)
 {
return _hypercall3(int, dm_op, dom, nr_bufs, bufs);
 }
diff --git a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
index 73db4b2eeb89..d3a732d1ede8 100644
--- a/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
+++ b/include/xen/arm/hypercall.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 long privcmd_call(unsigned call, unsigned long a1,
unsigned long a2, unsigned long a3,
@@ -53,7 +54,8 @@ int HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(int cmd, void *arg);
 int HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(int cmd, int vcpuid, void *extra_args);
 int HYPERVISOR_tmem_op(void *arg);
 int HYPERVISOR_vm_assist(unsigned int cmd, unsigned int type);
-int HYPERVISOR_dm_op(domid_t domid, unsigned int nr_bufs, void *bufs);
+int HYPERVISOR_dm_op(domid_t domid, unsigned int nr_bufs,
+struct xen_dm_op_buf *bufs);
 int HYPERVISOR_platform_op_raw(void *arg);
 static inline int HYPERVISOR_platform_op(struct xen_platform_op *op)
 {
-- 
2.11.0


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel