Am Dienstag 17 März 2015, 10:53:58 schrieb Boris Ostrovsky:
> We don't need to try to destroy it since it can't be already allocated at the
> time we try to initialize it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Seems to be already commited.
Dietmar.
> ---
>
> Changes in v19:
> * Removed unnecesary test for VPMU_CONTEXT_ALLOCATED in svm/vpmu.c
>
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c | 3 ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
> index 64dc167..6764070 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
> @@ -359,9 +359,6 @@ static int amd_vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
> struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
> uint8_t family = current_cpu_data.x86;
>
> -if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_ALLOCATED) )
> -return 0;
> -
> if ( counters == NULL )
> {
> switch ( family )
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
> index 0e6b6c0..c3273ee 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vpmu.c
> @@ -236,10 +236,7 @@ void vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
> if ( is_pvh_vcpu(v) )
> return;
>
> -if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_ALLOCATED) )
> -vpmu_destroy(v);
> -vpmu_clear(vpmu);
> -vpmu->context = NULL;
> +ASSERT(!vpmu->flags && !vpmu->context);
>
> switch ( vendor )
> {
>
--
Company details: http://ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel