[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Port two ACPI fixes from Linux
From: Shannon Zhao Len Brown (1): ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found Tomasz Nowicki (1): ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries xen/drivers/acpi/tables.c | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.0.4 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Port two ACPI fixes from Linux
>>> On 14.08.15 at 05:36, wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao > > Len Brown (1): > ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found > > Tomasz Nowicki (1): > ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries These look good now, but is there a reason you didn't also port the third commit I had referred you to (95df812dbd)? Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Port two ACPI fixes from Linux
Hi Jan, On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.15 at 05:36, wrote: From: Shannon Zhao Len Brown (1): ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found Tomasz Nowicki (1): ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries These look good now, but is there a reason you didn't also port the third commit I had referred you to (95df812dbd)? Oh, sorry, forgot that. So this two patches could go first and port 95df812dbd later or send a new version with 95df812dbd? Thanks, -- Shannon ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Port two ACPI fixes from Linux
>>> On 14.08.15 at 16:16, wrote: > On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.08.15 at 05:36, wrote: >>> From: Shannon Zhao >>> >>> Len Brown (1): >>>ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found >>> >>> Tomasz Nowicki (1): >>>ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries >> >> These look good now, but is there a reason you didn't also port >> the third commit I had referred you to (95df812dbd)? >> > > Oh, sorry, forgot that. So this two patches could go first and port > 95df812dbd later or send a new version with 95df812dbd? Since the patches will have to wait for the tree to re-open, there's no big difference to me (I'd hope to have the 3rd patch from you by the time they all could get committed). Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Port two ACPI fixes from Linux
On 2015/8/14 22:29, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.15 at 16:16, wrote: On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.15 at 05:36, wrote: From: Shannon Zhao Len Brown (1): ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found Tomasz Nowicki (1): ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries These look good now, but is there a reason you didn't also port the third commit I had referred you to (95df812dbd)? Oh, sorry, forgot that. So this two patches could go first and port 95df812dbd later or send a new version with 95df812dbd? Since the patches will have to wait for the tree to re-open, there's no big difference to me (I'd hope to have the 3rd patch from you by the time they all could get committed). Ok, will send a new version. Thanks, -- Shannon ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
