[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems. The only changes on this pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch. Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments! Alex Thorlton (2): x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 arch/x86/xen/setup.c| 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 1.8.5.6 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote: > This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with > XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems. The only changes on this > pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and > to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch. > > Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments! > > Alex Thorlton (2): > x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX > xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries > > arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 > arch/x86/xen/setup.c| 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take it through the Xen tree. Juergen ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries
* Juergen Gross wrote: > On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote: > > This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with > > XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems. The only changes on this > > pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and > > to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch. > > > > Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments! > > > > Alex Thorlton (2): > > x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX > > xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 > > arch/x86/xen/setup.c| 6 +++--- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches > should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take > it through the Xen tree. Sure, both are fine to me: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Thanks, Ingo ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel