Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling output
On 08/11/16 14:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The connect function prints an unintialized error code after an > earlier initialization was removed: > > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c: In function 'connect': > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c:938:3: error: 'err' may be used > uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > This prints it as -EINVAL instead, which seems to be the most > appropriate error code. Before the patch that caused the warning, > this would print a positive number returned by vsscanf() instead, > which is also wrong. We probably don't need a backport though, > as fixing the warning here should be sufficient. > > Fixes: f95842e7a9f2 ("xen: make use of xenbus_read_unsigned() in xen-netback") > Fixes: 8d3d53b3e433 ("xen-netback: Add support for multiple queues") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Applied to xen/tip.git for-linus-4.10 Thanks, Juergen > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > index 7356e00fac54..bfed79877b8a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be) > "multi-queue-num-queues", 1); > if (requested_num_queues > xenvif_max_queues) { > /* buggy or malicious guest */ > - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -EINVAL, >"guest requested %u queues, exceeding the > maximum of %u.", >requested_num_queues, xenvif_max_queues); > return; > ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling output
From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:34:34 +0100 > The connect function prints an unintialized error code after an > earlier initialization was removed: > > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c: In function 'connect': > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c:938:3: error: 'err' may be used > uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > This prints it as -EINVAL instead, which seems to be the most > appropriate error code. Before the patch that caused the warning, > this would print a positive number returned by vsscanf() instead, > which is also wrong. We probably don't need a backport though, > as fixing the warning here should be sufficient. > > Fixes: f95842e7a9f2 ("xen: make use of xenbus_read_unsigned() in xen-netback") > Fixes: 8d3d53b3e433 ("xen-netback: Add support for multiple queues") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann That first Fixes: commit mentioned is in neither of my trees, so I assume it is in the Xen tree and thus this fix should get applied there. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling output
> -Original Message- > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:a...@arndb.de] > Sent: 08 November 2016 13:35 > To: David Vrabel > Cc: Arnd Bergmann ; Wei Liu ; Paul > Durrant ; David S. Miller > ; Juergen Gross ; Filipe Manco > ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; > net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [Xen PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling output > > The connect function prints an unintialized error code after an > earlier initialization was removed: > > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c: In function 'connect': > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c:938:3: error: 'err' may be used > uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] > > This prints it as -EINVAL instead, which seems to be the most > appropriate error code. Before the patch that caused the warning, > this would print a positive number returned by vsscanf() instead, > which is also wrong. We probably don't need a backport though, > as fixing the warning here should be sufficient. > > Fixes: f95842e7a9f2 ("xen: make use of xenbus_read_unsigned() in xen- > netback") > Fixes: 8d3d53b3e433 ("xen-netback: Add support for multiple queues") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Yes, I'd say EINVAL was most appropriate. Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- > netback/xenbus.c > index 7356e00fac54..bfed79877b8a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be) > "multi-queue-num-queues", 1); > if (requested_num_queues > xenvif_max_queues) { > /* buggy or malicious guest */ > - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, > + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -EINVAL, >"guest requested %u queues, exceeding the > maximum of %u.", >requested_num_queues, > xenvif_max_queues); > return; > -- > 2.9.0 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [Xen PATCH] xen-netback: fix error handling output
The connect function prints an unintialized error code after an earlier initialization was removed: drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c: In function 'connect': drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c:938:3: error: 'err' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] This prints it as -EINVAL instead, which seems to be the most appropriate error code. Before the patch that caused the warning, this would print a positive number returned by vsscanf() instead, which is also wrong. We probably don't need a backport though, as fixing the warning here should be sufficient. Fixes: f95842e7a9f2 ("xen: make use of xenbus_read_unsigned() in xen-netback") Fixes: 8d3d53b3e433 ("xen-netback: Add support for multiple queues") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c index 7356e00fac54..bfed79877b8a 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be) "multi-queue-num-queues", 1); if (requested_num_queues > xenvif_max_queues) { /* buggy or malicious guest */ - xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, + xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, -EINVAL, "guest requested %u queues, exceeding the maximum of %u.", requested_num_queues, xenvif_max_queues); return; -- 2.9.0 ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel