Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-11-11 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:04:22PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:57:59PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:21:00AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:50AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > >   
> > > >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > >> 
> > > >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > >>>   
> > > >>>   
> > >  Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
> > >  daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
> > >  a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
> > >  log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
> > >  potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
> > >  be placed in the administrator's hands.
> > > 
> > >  Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
> > >  ---
> > >   src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
> > >   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >  
> > >  
> > > >>> ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
> > > >>> you might also consider supporting a config setting in 
> > > >>> /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
> > > >>> to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour 
> > > >>> independantly.
> > > >>>   
> > > >>>   
> > > >> I had actually thought of adding it there first, but then took this
> > > >> approach assuming it would be more receptive upstream :-). Personally,
> > > >> I'm on the fence. I like the idea of a single knob to control log level
> > > >> throughout the daemon, making it a bit easier on admins. On the other
> > > >> hand, individual knobs are more friendly to those pouring through logs.
> > > >> I can add a knob in libxl.conf if preferred.
> > > >> 
> > > >
> > > > After thinking about it some more, I could actually see value in
> > > > create a dedicated virLogSource() instance, solely for libxl
> > > > library messages. If we then created a virLogSourceGetPriority()
> > > > method, you could query that to see if to turn on logging for
> > > > the libxl library. That would ultimately allow you to turn on
> > > > debug for just the libxl library if desired, eg
> > > >
> > > >  static virLogSource virLogLibXL = {
> > > >  .name = "libxl.libxl_library",
> > > >  
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > LIBVIRT_LOG_FILTERS="1:libxl_library"
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > Ah, good idea. I'll look into it.
> > 
> > Is it done anywhere? If not, how can I help?
> > 
> > This the above change (setting libxl log level to libvirtd global one),
> > makes almost impossible to get libxl debug, because the rest of libvirtd
> > trashes the logs (hundreds virEvent* and virObject* messages, at
> > "info"(!) level).
> 
> Presumably that's because you are using LIBVIRT_DEBUG=1 or setting
> log_debug=1 in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.log. That is generally discouraged
> because it turns on all logging, which is essentially unusably verbose.
> 
> It is also better to use more specific log settings, eg when I debug
> the QEMU driver I usually use
> 
>   log_filters="1:qemu 1:security 3:event 3:object 1:util"
>   log_outputs="1:file:/var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log"
> 
> This generates log messages from every source file in qemu and
> security directories, and also log messages from every file
> in the util/ directory *except* for event & object files.
> So it is much more managable to read.

Ok, I'll try with "3:event 3:object", thanks!

> The log filter strings just do a wildcard match against the
> VIR_LOG_INIT(""); lines in each source file, so you can
> make things more or less specific as you desire.
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel

-- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


pgpihb7b1qXYF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-11-11 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:57:59PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:21:00AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:50AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > >   
> > >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > >>>   
> > >>>   
> >  Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
> >  daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
> >  a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
> >  log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
> >  potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
> >  be placed in the administrator's hands.
> > 
> >  Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
> >  ---
> >   src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
> >   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  
> >  
> > >>> ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
> > >>> you might also consider supporting a config setting in 
> > >>> /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
> > >>> to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour independantly.
> > >>>   
> > >>>   
> > >> I had actually thought of adding it there first, but then took this
> > >> approach assuming it would be more receptive upstream :-). Personally,
> > >> I'm on the fence. I like the idea of a single knob to control log level
> > >> throughout the daemon, making it a bit easier on admins. On the other
> > >> hand, individual knobs are more friendly to those pouring through logs.
> > >> I can add a knob in libxl.conf if preferred.
> > >> 
> > >
> > > After thinking about it some more, I could actually see value in
> > > create a dedicated virLogSource() instance, solely for libxl
> > > library messages. If we then created a virLogSourceGetPriority()
> > > method, you could query that to see if to turn on logging for
> > > the libxl library. That would ultimately allow you to turn on
> > > debug for just the libxl library if desired, eg
> > >
> > >  static virLogSource virLogLibXL = {
> > >  .name = "libxl.libxl_library",
> > >  
> > >  }
> > >
> > > LIBVIRT_LOG_FILTERS="1:libxl_library"
> > >   
> > 
> > Ah, good idea. I'll look into it.
> 
> Is it done anywhere? If not, how can I help?
> 
> This the above change (setting libxl log level to libvirtd global one),
> makes almost impossible to get libxl debug, because the rest of libvirtd
> trashes the logs (hundreds virEvent* and virObject* messages, at
> "info"(!) level).

Presumably that's because you are using LIBVIRT_DEBUG=1 or setting
log_debug=1 in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.log. That is generally discouraged
because it turns on all logging, which is essentially unusably verbose.

It is also better to use more specific log settings, eg when I debug
the QEMU driver I usually use

  log_filters="1:qemu 1:security 3:event 3:object 1:util"
  log_outputs="1:file:/var/log/libvirt/libvirtd.log"

This generates log messages from every source file in qemu and
security directories, and also log messages from every file
in the util/ directory *except* for event & object files.
So it is much more managable to read.

The log filter strings just do a wildcard match against the
VIR_LOG_INIT(""); lines in each source file, so you can
make things more or less specific as you desire.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-11-11 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:21:00AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:50AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >   
> >> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>   
>  Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
>  daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
>  a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
>  log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
>  potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
>  be placed in the administrator's hands.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
>  ---
>   src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  
>  
> >>> ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
> >>> you might also consider supporting a config setting in 
> >>> /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
> >>> to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour independantly.
> >>>   
> >>>   
> >> I had actually thought of adding it there first, but then took this
> >> approach assuming it would be more receptive upstream :-). Personally,
> >> I'm on the fence. I like the idea of a single knob to control log level
> >> throughout the daemon, making it a bit easier on admins. On the other
> >> hand, individual knobs are more friendly to those pouring through logs.
> >> I can add a knob in libxl.conf if preferred.
> >> 
> >
> > After thinking about it some more, I could actually see value in
> > create a dedicated virLogSource() instance, solely for libxl
> > library messages. If we then created a virLogSourceGetPriority()
> > method, you could query that to see if to turn on logging for
> > the libxl library. That would ultimately allow you to turn on
> > debug for just the libxl library if desired, eg
> >
> >  static virLogSource virLogLibXL = {
> >  .name = "libxl.libxl_library",
> >  
> >  }
> >
> > LIBVIRT_LOG_FILTERS="1:libxl_library"
> >   
> 
> Ah, good idea. I'll look into it.

Is it done anywhere? If not, how can I help?

This the above change (setting libxl log level to libvirtd global one),
makes almost impossible to get libxl debug, because the rest of libvirtd
trashes the logs (hundreds virEvent* and virObject* messages, at
"info"(!) level).

-- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?


pgpf_2Kk8YWao.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-09-15 Thread Jim Fehlig
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:50AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>   
>> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>>   
>>>   
 Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
 daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
 a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
 log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
 potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
 be placed in the administrator's hands.

 Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
 ---
  src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 
>>> ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
>>> you might also consider supporting a config setting in 
>>> /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
>>> to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour independantly.
>>>   
>>>   
>> I had actually thought of adding it there first, but then took this
>> approach assuming it would be more receptive upstream :-). Personally,
>> I'm on the fence. I like the idea of a single knob to control log level
>> throughout the daemon, making it a bit easier on admins. On the other
>> hand, individual knobs are more friendly to those pouring through logs.
>> I can add a knob in libxl.conf if preferred.
>> 
>
> After thinking about it some more, I could actually see value in
> create a dedicated virLogSource() instance, solely for libxl
> library messages. If we then created a virLogSourceGetPriority()
> method, you could query that to see if to turn on logging for
> the libxl library. That would ultimately allow you to turn on
> debug for just the libxl library if desired, eg
>
>  static virLogSource virLogLibXL = {
>  .name = "libxl.libxl_library",
>  
>  }
>
> LIBVIRT_LOG_FILTERS="1:libxl_library"
>   

Ah, good idea. I'll look into it.

> Regardless we should just merge your current patch right now.
>   

Thanks; done now.

Regards,
Jim


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-09-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:57:50AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >   
> >> Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
> >> daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
> >> a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
> >> log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
> >> potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
> >> be placed in the administrator's hands.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
> >> ---
> >>  src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >
> > ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
> > you might also consider supporting a config setting in 
> > /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
> > to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour independantly.
> >   
> 
> I had actually thought of adding it there first, but then took this
> approach assuming it would be more receptive upstream :-). Personally,
> I'm on the fence. I like the idea of a single knob to control log level
> throughout the daemon, making it a bit easier on admins. On the other
> hand, individual knobs are more friendly to those pouring through logs.
> I can add a knob in libxl.conf if preferred.

After thinking about it some more, I could actually see value in
create a dedicated virLogSource() instance, solely for libxl
library messages. If we then created a virLogSourceGetPriority()
method, you could query that to see if to turn on logging for
the libxl library. That would ultimately allow you to turn on
debug for just the libxl library if desired, eg

 static virLogSource virLogLibXL = {
 .name = "libxl.libxl_library",
 
 }

LIBVIRT_LOG_FILTERS="1:libxl_library"

Regardless we should just merge your current patch right now.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-09-15 Thread Jim Fehlig
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>   
>> Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
>> daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
>> a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
>> log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
>> potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
>> be placed in the administrator's hands.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
>> ---
>>  src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>
> ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
> you might also consider supporting a config setting in /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
> to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour independantly.
>   

I had actually thought of adding it there first, but then took this
approach assuming it would be more receptive upstream :-). Personally,
I'm on the fence. I like the idea of a single knob to control log level
throughout the daemon, making it a bit easier on admins. On the other
hand, individual knobs are more friendly to those pouring through logs.
I can add a knob in libxl.conf if preferred.

Regards,
Jim


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH] libxl: open libxl log stream with libvirtd log_level

2015-09-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:26:23AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Instead of a hardcoded DEBUG log level, use the overall
> daemon log level specified in libvirtd.conf when opening
> a log stream with libxl. libxl is very verbose when DEBUG
> log level is set, resulting in huge log files that can
> potentially fill a disk. Control of libxl verbosity should
> be placed in the administrator's hands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig 
> ---
>  src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 18 +-
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

ACK, this makes sense as default behaviour. As a future enhancement
you might also consider supporting a config setting in /etc/libvirt/libxl.conf
to explicitly control the libxl library logging behaviour independantly.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel