Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH v3 1/3] Add virXMLValidateAgainstSchema helper method

2015-01-16 Thread Ian Campbell
Hello,

On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:00 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 +#  define VIR_WARNINGS_NO_PRINTF \
 +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic push) \
 +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)

Xen automated tests are failing to build on all architectures with:

util/virxml.c: In function 'catchRNGError':
util/virxml.c:1094:9: error: unknown option after '#pragma GCC 
diagnostic' kind [-Werror=pragmas]

which I think must be down to one of these additions.

(helpful of gcc not to print the unknown option in question!)

test overview:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/
specific failure log:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/build-amd64-libvirt/5.ts-libvirt-build.log

We use Debian Wheezy's gcc, which is 4.6.3 AFAIK.

Cheers,
Ian.


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH v3 1/3] Add virXMLValidateAgainstSchema helper method

2015-01-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:58:27PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
 Hello,
 
 On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:00 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
  +#  define VIR_WARNINGS_NO_PRINTF \
  +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic push) \
  +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
 
 Xen automated tests are failing to build on all architectures with:
 
 util/virxml.c: In function 'catchRNGError':
 util/virxml.c:1094:9: error: unknown option after '#pragma GCC 
 diagnostic' kind [-Werror=pragmas]
 
 which I think must be down to one of these additions.
 
 (helpful of gcc not to print the unknown option in question!)
 
 test overview:
 http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/
 specific failure log:
 http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/build-amd64-libvirt/5.ts-libvirt-build.log
 
 We use Debian Wheezy's gcc, which is 4.6.3 AFAIK.

The configure logs show

checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=const... yes
checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=format... no
checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn... yes
checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=pure... yes

So, can someone with a Debian machine check if it helps to modify

_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)

To be just

_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute\)

THough, I guess some very old gcc might not support -Wsuggest-attribute
at all, so perhaps we need to check this fully

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH v3 1/3] Add virXMLValidateAgainstSchema helper method

2015-01-16 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 14:19 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:58:27PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
  Hello,
  
  On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:00 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
   +#  define VIR_WARNINGS_NO_PRINTF \
   +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic push) \
   +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
  
  Xen automated tests are failing to build on all architectures with:
  
  util/virxml.c: In function 'catchRNGError':
  util/virxml.c:1094:9: error: unknown option after '#pragma GCC 
  diagnostic' kind [-Werror=pragmas]
  
  which I think must be down to one of these additions.
  
  (helpful of gcc not to print the unknown option in question!)
  
  test overview:
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/
  specific failure log:
  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/build-amd64-libvirt/5.ts-libvirt-build.log
  
  We use Debian Wheezy's gcc, which is 4.6.3 AFAIK.
 
 The configure logs show
 
 checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=const... yes
 checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=format... no
 checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn... yes
 checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=pure... yes
 
 So, can someone with a Debian machine check if it helps to modify
 
 _Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
 
 To be just
 
 _Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute\)

I'm afraid it doesn't seem to. Specifically:
diff --git a/src/internal.h b/src/internal.h
index 9855c49..508f8b5 100644
--- a/src/internal.h
+++ b/src/internal.h
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
 _Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wcast-align\)
 #  define VIR_WARNINGS_NO_PRINTF \
 _Pragma (GCC diagnostic push) \
-_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
+_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute\)
 
 #  define VIR_WARNINGS_RESET \
 _Pragma (GCC diagnostic pop)

Didn't help.

According to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
 the valid -Wsuggest-attributes=FOO in that version are pure const and noreturn.

=format seems to have arrived in 4.8, FWIW.

Ian.



___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH v3 1/3] Add virXMLValidateAgainstSchema helper method

2015-01-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:47:42PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
 On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 14:19 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
  On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:58:27PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
   Hello,
   
   On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:00 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+#  define VIR_WARNINGS_NO_PRINTF \
+_Pragma (GCC diagnostic push) \
+_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
   
   Xen automated tests are failing to build on all architectures with:
   
   util/virxml.c: In function 'catchRNGError':
   util/virxml.c:1094:9: error: unknown option after '#pragma GCC 
   diagnostic' kind [-Werror=pragmas]
   
   which I think must be down to one of these additions.
   
   (helpful of gcc not to print the unknown option in question!)
   
   test overview:
   http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/
   specific failure log:
   http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33443/build-amd64-libvirt/5.ts-libvirt-build.log
   
   We use Debian Wheezy's gcc, which is 4.6.3 AFAIK.
  
  The configure logs show
  
  checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=const... yes
  checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=format... no
  checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn... yes
  checking whether C compiler handles -Wsuggest-attribute=pure... yes
  
  So, can someone with a Debian machine check if it helps to modify
  
  _Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
  
  To be just
  
  _Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute\)
 
 I'm afraid it doesn't seem to. Specifically:
 diff --git a/src/internal.h b/src/internal.h
 index 9855c49..508f8b5 100644
 --- a/src/internal.h
 +++ b/src/internal.h
 @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
  _Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wcast-align\)
  #  define VIR_WARNINGS_NO_PRINTF \
  _Pragma (GCC diagnostic push) \
 -_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute=format\)
 +_Pragma (GCC diagnostic ignored \-Wsuggest-attribute\)
  
  #  define VIR_WARNINGS_RESET \
  _Pragma (GCC diagnostic pop)
 
 Didn't help.
 
 According to
 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
  the valid -Wsuggest-attributes=FOO in that version are pure const and 
 noreturn.
 
 =format seems to have arrived in 4.8, FWIW.

I just copied you on an alternative patch that would hopefully fix
it - I explicitly check if suggest-attribute=format exists in the
gcc version used.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel