Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 06:41 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: On 16.08.15 at 11:14, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is that you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should block that over this issue. Right. Flight 60696 shows exactly the same single failure. Could one of you two force-push then please? Sorry for the delay. I went to look into this and found it had passed in the meantime. There's some new stuff in staging-4.4 now, which looks to be the subject of flight 60802, which is due to finish this afternoon. Ian. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
On 16.08.15 at 11:14, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote: On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is that you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should block that over this issue. Right. Flight 60696 shows exactly the same single failure. Could one of you two force-push then please? Thanks, Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: On 14.08.15 at 11:14, osstest-ad...@xenproject.org wrote: flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 60152 Iirc this same test has been failing here and there a number of times recently FYI there is data about this sort of thing at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/$test e.g. http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/ and especially: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/ALL.html http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/xen-4.4-testing.html - is this a sign of some issue unrelated to the software under test? it does seem to have been happening on this branch a lot since the colo move. I think that is more likely to be down to the change in the underlying hardware as to something wrong with the code. OTOH The history for 4.5-testing and unstable shows a far lower incidence that 4.4. If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is that you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should block that over this issue. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 60152 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 60217 test-amd64-i386-libvirt 11 guest-start fail like 60217 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 11 guest-start fail like 60217 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 60217 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-buildfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 9 debian-di-installfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-qcow2 9 debian-di-installfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw 9 debian-di-installfail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 9 debian-di-installfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-installfail never pass build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-buildfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail never pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 saverestore-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 11 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw 11 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 saverestore-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 13 saverestore-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qcow2 11 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 11 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw 11 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd 11 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 21 leak-check/checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 13 saverestore-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass version targeted for testing: xen 3646b134c1673f09c0a239de10b0da4c9265c8e8 baseline version: xen 214fd40a20fa5988b4ea021c2d06e8aca8dda184 Last test of basis60217 2015-08-01 07:47:04 Z 13 days Testing same since60673 2015-08-12 12:38:56 Z1 days1 attempts People who touched revisions under test: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com Jim Fehlig jfeh...@suse.com Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com jobs: build-amd64-xend pass build-i386-xend pass build-amd64 pass build-armhf pass build-i386 pass build-amd64-libvirt pass build-armhf-libvirt pass build-i386-libvirt pass build-amd64-pvopspass build-armhf-pvopspass build-i386-pvops pass build-amd64-rumpuserxen fail build-i386-rumpuserxen fail test-amd64-amd64-xl pass test-armhf-armhf-xl
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
On 14.08.15 at 11:14, osstest-ad...@xenproject.org wrote: flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 60152 Iirc this same test has been failing here and there a number of times recently - is this a sign of some issue unrelated to the software under test? If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
