>>> On 30.11.15 at 21:28, wrote:
> On 11/27/2015 08:42 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Instead of choosing the interface to expose to guests based on the guest
>> type, do it based on whether the guest has an emulated local apic or not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
>> Acked-by: Jan Beulich
>> Cc: Jan Beulich
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper
>> ---
>> Changes since v8:
>> - Don't add the xenpmu hypercalls to the HVM hypercall table (yet).
>
> Without having the hypercalls available to HVMlite (?) guests these
> changes, except possibly those in vmx.c/svm.c, are somewhat pointless
> since we never reach patched code.
>
> I understand desire not to increase size of hypercall tables which we
> want to eventually get rid of but is it really worth doing (or rather
> not doing) at the cost of not including useful functionality?
Considering that Konrad had designated you as (kind of informal)
PVH maintainer, perhaps this is a good reason for you to actually
do the folding now (and maybe we should record maintainership in
./MAINTAINERS even if there are no specific files to be listed)? In
any event, my ack was made dependent on the HVM hypercall
tables being left alone until folded, and I don't think I want to give
up on that.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
