Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 06:41 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 16.08.15 at 11:14, wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this > > > flight. > > > > Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is > > that > > you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should > > block > > that over this issue. > > Right. Flight 60696 shows exactly the same single failure. > > Could one of you two force-push then please? Sorry for the delay. I went to look into this and found it had passed in the meantime. There's some new stuff in staging-4.4 now, which looks to be the subject of flight 60802, which is due to finish this afternoon. Ian. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 16.08.15 at 11:14, wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. > > Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is that > you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should block > that over this issue. Right. Flight 60696 shows exactly the same single failure. Could one of you two force-push then please? Thanks, Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 14.08.15 at 11:14, wrote: > > flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail > > REGR. vs. 60152 > > Iirc this same test has been failing here and there a number of times > recently FYI there is data about this sort of thing at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/$test e.g. http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/ and especially: http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/ALL.html http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/xen-4.4-testing.html > - is this a sign of some issue unrelated to the software under > test? it does seem to have been happening on this branch a lot since the colo move. I think that is more likely to be down to the change in the underlying hardware as to something wrong with the code. OTOH The history for 4.5-testing and unstable shows a far lower incidence that 4.4. > If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is that you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should block that over this issue. > > Jan > > > ___ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 14.08.15 at 11:14, wrote: > flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. > 60152 Iirc this same test has been failing here and there a number of times recently - is this a sign of some issue unrelated to the software under test? If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
