Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation [and 4 more messages]
On 25/04/18 17:58, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support > matrix generation [and 4 more messages]"): >> Thanks everyone. I have pushed this to staging-4.10, including the >> patch 10/9. > > The first cut of the cron job is now running. So far it is only > running off staging, and the output is here: > > http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable-staging/support-matrix.html > > It's labelled DRAFT because it's from staging, not because it's > hand-edited or anything. > > When we get pushes of all the relevant branches to the corresponding > stable branches, I think the non-DRAFT version is ready to go. > > Ian. > The links to the 4.10 SUPPORT.html aren't working: https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/4.10-testing/SUPPORT.html Juergen ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation [and 4 more messages]
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation [and 4 more messages]"): > Thanks everyone. I have pushed this to staging-4.10, including the > patch 10/9. The first cut of the cron job is now running. So far it is only running off staging, and the output is here: http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable-staging/support-matrix.html It's labelled DRAFT because it's from staging, not because it's hand-edited or anything. When we get pushes of all the relevant branches to the corresponding stable branches, I think the non-DRAFT version is ready to go. Ian. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation [and 4 more messages]
Ian Jackson writes ("[PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation"): > This is a backport of my two recent series to fix bugs in SUPPORT.md, > format it as part of the published docs, and use relative position of > the `Status' stanza compared to descriptive text to indicate whether > the text is a caveat that deserves a footnote. Thanks everyone. I have pushed this to staging-4.10, including the patch 10/9. Ian. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation
>>> On 25.04.18 at 14:59,wrote: > This is a backport of my two recent series to fix bugs in SUPPORT.md, > format it as part of the published docs, and use relative position of > the `Status' stanza compared to descriptive text to indicate whether > the text is a caveat that deserves a footnote. > > Most of this is uncontroversial and I have run the build and checked > that the resulting index.html is good. > > It would be good if someone could review particularly the way I > resolved the conflicts in the big patch to SUPPORT.md, ie in > [PATCH 8/9] SUPPORT.md: Move descriptions up before Status info > > The result for 4.10's > SUPPORT.md is here: > > https://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/2018/support-matrix-example-C/SUPPORT.html > > I have also checked that (with the patch I am about to send for > staging's parse-support-md) that this generates a sensible-looking > support matrix. The resulting support matrix can be found here: > https://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/2018/support-matrix-example-C/t.html > (The hyperlink references for staging are to the live xenbits version; > the references for 4.10 are to the example output file mentioned above.) > > I have squashed the fix to not depend on HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath into > the patch that introduces the dependency. Acked-by: Jan Beulich ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation
This is a backport of my two recent series to fix bugs in SUPPORT.md, format it as part of the published docs, and use relative position of the `Status' stanza compared to descriptive text to indicate whether the text is a caveat that deserves a footnote. Most of this is uncontroversial and I have run the build and checked that the resulting index.html is good. It would be good if someone could review particularly the way I resolved the conflicts in the big patch to SUPPORT.md, ie in [PATCH 8/9] SUPPORT.md: Move descriptions up before Status info The result for 4.10's SUPPORT.md is here: https://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/2018/support-matrix-example-C/SUPPORT.html I have also checked that (with the patch I am about to send for staging's parse-support-md) that this generates a sensible-looking support matrix. The resulting support matrix can be found here: https://xenbits.xen.org/people/iwj/2018/support-matrix-example-C/t.html (The hyperlink references for staging are to the live xenbits version; the references for 4.10 are to the example output file mentioned above.) I have squashed the fix to not depend on HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath into the patch that introduces the dependency. For my reference, this was made as follows: docs/support-matrix-generate -D HEAD https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable-staging/SUPPORT.html refs/heads/wip.support-stmt-NN-2 SUPPORT.html 2>&1 >docs/html/t.html |less rsync -LvP docs/html/{t,SUPPORT}.html xenbits:public_html/2018/support-matrix-example-C Thanks, Ian. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel