Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to stable trees
>>> On 28.09.18 at 10:28, wrote: > On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 15:36 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please can the following patches be considered for stable. >> > Can we also include: > > 6e395f477fb85 - xen: sched/Credit2: fix bug when moving CPUs between > two Credit2 cpupools > > for 4.10 and 4.11 ? I have this queued already. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to stable trees
On Thu, 2018-09-27 at 15:36 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Hello, > > Please can the following patches be considered for stable. > Can we also include: 6e395f477fb85 - xen: sched/Credit2: fix bug when moving CPUs between two Credit2 cpupools for 4.10 and 4.11 ? From a quick check, it' not as easy as cherry-picking/applying the patch (there's 1 hunk that fails), but it shouldn't be too bad. And I can provide the backport, if you want me to. Thanks, Dario -- <> (Raistlin Majere) - Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Software Engineer @ SUSE https://www.suse.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to stable trees
>>> On 27.09.18 at 19:54, wrote: > On 27/09/18 15:36, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please can the following patches be considered for stable. >> >> 18cd4997d26b - x86/efi: move the logic to detect PE build support >> 93249f7fc17c - x86/efi: split compiler vs linker support >> >> CentOS and RHEL 7.x GCC's are capable of compiling xen.gz with EFI >> support, but LD doesn't have i386pep support. Without a bodge to the >> build system (and several downstreams have borrowed by XenServer bodge), >> making a EFI-capable xen.gz isn't possible with the default toolchain. >> >> These patches resolve the issue. > > In addition, it looks like: > > 328ca55b7bd4 - x86/shutdown: use ACPI reboot method for Dell PowerEdge R540 > 7626edeaca97 - x86/hvm/emulate: make sure rep I/O emulation does not > cross GFN boundaries Hmm, odd - I had certainly meant to (and actually thought I did already) apply the latter. I'll queue up all of the above (afaict the former two are relevant only back to 4.9). Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Backports to stable trees
On 27/09/18 15:36, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Hello, > > Please can the following patches be considered for stable. > > 18cd4997d26b - x86/efi: move the logic to detect PE build support > 93249f7fc17c - x86/efi: split compiler vs linker support > > CentOS and RHEL 7.x GCC's are capable of compiling xen.gz with EFI > support, but LD doesn't have i386pep support. Without a bodge to the > build system (and several downstreams have borrowed by XenServer bodge), > making a EFI-capable xen.gz isn't possible with the default toolchain. > > These patches resolve the issue. In addition, it looks like: 328ca55b7bd4 - x86/shutdown: use ACPI reboot method for Dell PowerEdge R540 7626edeaca97 - x86/hvm/emulate: make sure rep I/O emulation does not cross GFN boundaries are general bugfix candidates for backport. ~Andrew ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Backports to stable trees
Hello, Please can the following patches be considered for stable. 18cd4997d26b - x86/efi: move the logic to detect PE build support 93249f7fc17c - x86/efi: split compiler vs linker support CentOS and RHEL 7.x GCC's are capable of compiling xen.gz with EFI support, but LD doesn't have i386pep support. Without a bodge to the build system (and several downstreams have borrowed by XenServer bodge), making a EFI-capable xen.gz isn't possible with the default toolchain. These patches resolve the issue. ~Andrew ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel