pushed, thanks
On Nov 28, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Amos Waterland wrote:
Do not override the caller's wishes regarding waiting for smp function
call completion. I was being too conservative in this respect: the
lock
protects the call_data structure, and the function called is
expected to
be threadsafe.
Signed-off-by: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
smp.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff -r a8e67a19c325 xen/arch/powerpc/smp.c
--- a/xen/arch/powerpc/smp.cTue Nov 28 10:33:53 2006 -0500
+++ b/xen/arch/powerpc/smp.cTue Nov 28 16:28:10 2006 -0500
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int on_selected_cpus(
call_data.func = func;
call_data.info = info;
call_data.wait = wait;
-call_data.wait = 1; /* Until we get RCU around call_data. */
atomic_set(&call_data.started, 0);
atomic_set(&call_data.finished, 0);
mb();
___
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
___
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel