Re: [XeTeX] Extra trailing space in IPA font with xltxtra

2010-09-21 Thread Heiko Oberdiek
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:30:20PM +0200, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:

 After an update of TL, the example breaks with lots of errors and warnings:

Sorry false alarm, an old fontspec.sty in the scratch directory was found
first.
Yours sincerely
  Heiko Oberdiek


--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex


Re: [XeTeX] If font under fontspec

2010-09-21 Thread Gareth Hughes
Michiel Kamermans wrote:
 Purely from a production point of view: if you have a document for which
 it is important the right fonts are available, making sure the fonts are
 available to whomever needs to compile it might deserve consideration
 too. So that rather than trying to fix the source, you throw a compile
 error that the user does not have the prerequisite fonts to accurately
 generate the document that was intended to be generated.
 
 Just thinking along the original TeX idea that If it compiles, the
 result is the same for every system it successfully compiles on.

Yes, I can understand your reasoning here. Though perhaps I should have
explained myself better in the first place. The Syriac font Estrangelo
Edessa leaves noticeable white space before the letter ܓ when it is
preceded by a non-joining letter. It seems this is a carry over from old
metal type. Some people see it as a feature rather than a bug, but I
wanted to provide a fairly smart user command for closing up that white
space, and have written something with \XeTeXinterchartoks to do so.
However, it is important that this kerning isn't applied when other
Syriac fonts, which have no gap, are being set.

I hope that makes the situation a little more clear.

Gareth.


--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex


[XeTeX] (NOTABUG) Re: buggy hyphenation with fontspec-2.1

2010-09-21 Thread Pablo Rodríguez

On 09/21/2010 09:56 PM, Michiel Kamermans wrote:

On 9/21/2010 12:45 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:

Hi there,

checking whether a clash between fontspec and babel in LuaLaTeX
(already reported at
http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/luatex/2010-August/001895.html), I have
just discovered new issues with this document:

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage[german,spanish]{babel}


Not sure if it solves things, but don't use babel with xe(la)tex. Use
polyglossia.


Thanks for your help, Michael.

I'm afraid that polyglossia is not an option for me and I guess babel 
shouldn't be clashing with fontspec-2.1.


But using the source contained at 
http://tug.org/pipermail/luatex/2010-June/001603.html, I have realized 
that hyphenation works fine with fontspec, but to get the \showhyphens 
command to work I should load xltxtra package instead.


Sorry for the noise and thanks for your help,


Pablo


--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
 http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex


Re: [XeTeX] Installation of Texlive on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-21 Thread alex k
Though I didn't tried with Kile, I don't have any problem with Texlive 2010
and texworks, emacs and gvim.

By the way, I have just writen an article for students who want to get a try
to texlive with windows but who are not really aware of the installation
process. Maybe it will be useful for you too :
http://niktarace.wordpress.com/2010/09/20/installing-a-tex-distribution-windows-mac-osx-gnulinux-freebsd/

Look at the second item, part 2.

2010/9/22 Juan Francisco Fraile Vicente juanfrancisc...@gmail.com

 As I have installed ubuntu 10.04 on my computer, I would like to have your
 advice about what is the best way of installing TeXlive at the moment.

 What is working better at the moment? Texlive 2010 or 2009?
 Is it better to do a full install from the iso file or install everything
 from the repositories of Canonical?

 When I was in Karmic Koala I installed the full Texlive, not from the
 repositories. Everything was ok, I used the TeXworks editor of Jonathan, but
 I tried to install Kile (from source) to give it a try and it was impossible
 for me. I don't know if the situation is different now, so I would like to
 know your opinions about this question, what is the best (I mean, less
 problematic in the future) installation in this distribution.

 Thanks for your opinions and help in advance.

 Fran



 --
 Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex




--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex