Re: [XeTeX] abraces and unicode-math
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote: Khaled already fixed the bug in the git repository. If you are willing to compile XeTeX yourself (or maybe someone else could compile it for you if you have problems compiling on your machine) you can already get a working version now. This seems to not be the case for Windows systems. The page http://tug.org/texlive/build.html lists Akira Kakuto as the builder for win32. Akira Kakuto apparently maintains http://w32tex.org/. As of 2013 February 11, the newest file in that repository is xetex-w32.tar.xz updated 2013 February 11 11:04am. However, in the change log for 2013 February 11 it says (04) xetex-w32.tar.xz Update libpoppler (0.22.1). A bug in the unicode-math is not fixed, because the fixed one contains rather large differences and it is under discussion. Khaled has stated that there is an issue with synctex now that prevents Akira from building the very latest XeTeX. So, maybe I need to keep the abraces solution on the table for now. Dan On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: Using \underbrace with the unicode-math package In the TeXLive 2012 distribution produces sporadic errors. It has been stated that underbraces are handled by the engine and that a fix will not be available until the release of TeXLive 2013. Khaled already fixed the bug in the git repository. If you are willing to compile XeTeX yourself (or maybe someone else could compile it for you if you have problems compiling on your machine) you can already get a working version now. It's just that there won't be any official binary release before TL 2013. Mojca -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] abraces and unicode-math
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Khaled already fixed the bug in the git repository. If you are willing to compile XeTeX yourself (or maybe someone else could compile it for you if you have problems compiling on your machine) you can already get a working version now. This seems to not be the case for Windows systems. The page http://tug.org/texlive/build.html lists Akira Kakuto as the builder for win32. My statement that if you are willing to compile it yourself still stands, but compiling on windows might be way more painful than compiling on any other unix platform. But then again: I don't remember many problems that Akira Kakuto wasn't able to solve/crack within a very short time span. (I admire his wizard skills when working with windows compilers.) Mojca -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] abraces and unicode-math
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote: My statement that if you are willing to compile it yourself still stands,... If someone as skilled and experienced as Akira is having that much of a problem, it may take someone like myself with very little experience in this type of skill a very very long time. But then again: I don't remember many problems that Akira Kakuto wasn't able to solve/crack within a very short time span. (I admire his wizard skills when working with windows compilers.) This information about Akira is genuinely useful to me. I will wait awhile a see what might come out of the pipe. In the event that nothing comes out, I will only have myself to blame for waiting. If something does come out (and from what you have said it is likely that it will), then I have all that time to invest in other work. Dan On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Khaled already fixed the bug in the git repository. If you are willing to compile XeTeX yourself (or maybe someone else could compile it for you if you have problems compiling on your machine) you can already get a working version now. This seems to not be the case for Windows systems. The page http://tug.org/texlive/build.html lists Akira Kakuto as the builder for win32. My statement that if you are willing to compile it yourself still stands, but compiling on windows might be way more painful than compiling on any other unix platform. But then again: I don't remember many problems that Akira Kakuto wasn't able to solve/crack within a very short time span. (I admire his wizard skills when working with windows compilers.) Mojca -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Re: [XeTeX] abraces and unicode-math
My statement that if you are willing to compile it yourself still stands, but compiling on windows might be way more painful than compiling on any other unix platform. kidding Since when Windows is another Unix platform? /kidding A.S. -- Apostolos Syropoulos Xanthi, Greece -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
