Re: [XFree86] XShmSegmentInfo issues
>I think you've misinterpreted this. Aside from corruption of > the ximage data structure, the only time BadValue is returned > is if your source rectangle passed to XShmPutImage lies outside > of the XImage (or if you pass junk for the send_event). Check > your dimensions passed to XShmPutImage. that's odd then - if a rearrange my code so i call create 1 then write 1 then create 2 then write 2 it works perfectly. if i call create 1 create 2 write 1 write 2 it fails with the X error i mentioned. (where 'create' does all the shm stuff and creation of the ximage and 'write' does the 'XShmPutImage' so i don't need to save/restone any of the XShmSegmentInfo then ? >Segments don't disappear until after they are removed and the last > process attaching to them has detached. Even if you remove it, it > will not go away until after you detach. When your program quits > or crashes, it detaches automatically. However, it does not get > removed automatically, so if the app quits or crashes before removing > the segment, the segment will get leaked. That's why it's common > practice to attach and then remove a segment. thanks for that clarification - excellent. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] XShmSegmentInfo issues
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Callum Prentice wrote: > i have a methods in a class to create a shared memory x image - it creates and > stores an > xImage in the usual way: > > XShmSegmentInfo shminfo; > ximage = XShmCreateImage(..., &shminfo); > shminfo.shmid = shmget (.., ximage->height * ximage->bytes_per_line, ...); > shminfo.shmaddr = ximage->data = shmat(shminfo.shmid, 0, 0); > shminfo.readOnly = False; > XShmAttach (display, &shminfo); > > i call this method in several places and only call XShmPutImage on the xImage later > in my > code. > > i get an X error: > > "X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) > Major opcode of failed request: 144 (MIT-SHM) > Minor opcode of failed request: 3 (X_ShmPutImage)" > > which appears to be because the shared segment info has changed. I think you've misinterpreted this. Aside from corruption of the ximage data structure, the only time BadValue is returned is if your source rectangle passed to XShmPutImage lies outside of the XImage (or if you pass junk for the send_event). Check your dimensions passed to XShmPutImage. > > if i save the shminfo each time and then re-attach it to the display before i call > XShmPutImage, i still get the problem. > > any ideas ? what is the right thing to do here. > > also - in the code i'm using there is a call to: > > shmctl ( shmInfo.shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL ); > > just after it's created - surely this is wrong and i shouldn't remeove the sgm > segment until > my program is finishing. Segments don't disappear until after they are removed and the last process attaching to them has detached. Even if you remove it, it will not go away until after you detach. When your program quits or crashes, it detaches automatically. However, it does not get removed automatically, so if the app quits or crashes before removing the segment, the segment will get leaked. That's why it's common practice to attach and then remove a segment. Mark. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] 2d performance info
Billy Biggs wrote: Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp enabled Does the open source driver use DMA at all? If it doesn't, do the higher AGP modes even help at all? for matrox? I believe so. I'm sure some drivers do not but i'd suspect matrox's to. Can you back this up somehow? I have a Matrox G400 card. The open source "mga" driver clearly does not do DMA transfers for MIT-SHM uploads to video memory, nor for XVIDEO (see the source). Using Option "AGPMode" I see no difference at all in SHM or XVIDEO performance. Or did you mean something else by "aggressive with agp enabled" ? RENDER does not use dma at all, which hinders performance a lot i would think seeing as how render is used from anti-aliased fonts to alphablending and the more programs use either the more render's performance comes into question. How would RENDER use DMA? I know keithp talks about doing things like DMA'ing video data FROM video memory back to system memory in order to do compositing on the CPU, then send it back, but I think that idea is silly. and backing store enabled, Is this good or bad? good for drivers that can use it correctly. Bad for ones that cant. Can you tell me what this feature does and how it would help performance? i'm being held back by this G450 despite all the support for using the backend scaler and triple buffering for video playback that i use often. Don't trust this. The video stuff is often quite hacky and it's not very good, even for this 'well supported' card. Specs are widely available yet all of these drivers could still use a ton of work, and now the cards are getting quite obsolete. Dont trust it in what way? I have a G450, I've hacked mplayer's matrox driver to utilize the backend scaler for triple buffering and i've most definitely seen the difference compared to straight xv. It definitely works well on the G450 and support is nearly non-existant for any other card in this area as far as i know. OK here is what I know, tell me where you think it is wrong. With mga_vid the application writes directly to video RAM, a performance gain, and it is triple buffered to avoid tearing since the hardware page flips on retrace. XFree86 4.2 (finally) included the patch double buffered XVIDEO in the mga driver. XFree86 is now effectively triple buffered, since applications write to system memory, and you can have one frame queued waiting in video memory. So the only difference between mga_vid and XVIDEO right now is that with XVIDEO, the X server copies the next frame from system memory to video memory, while mga_vid lets the application write to video memory. There is no tearing in either, only a speed difference. Disadvantages to using mga_vid: 1. It is in conflict with the X server and fbcon drivers for the same hardware. Switching VTs while mga_vid is being used causes system crashes. There is no locking for these competing drivers. XVIDEO colour key gets out of sync with the mga_vid colour key. first off, mga_vid does not need fbcon, and everything is more stable when fbcon is not enabled and being used. I've yet to see mga_vid cause a crash on my X when switching VT's (not that you'd ever need to really). I dont know why or what color keys getting out of sync between the two video output methods matter since they use the same hardware and thus cant be used at the same time. Just like xv cant be used to display two video outputs on the same screen at the same time. 2. mga_vid assumes the 'end' of video RAM is available and does not coordinate with the X server for allocating video memory. It has been known to cause corruption of the desktop and app pixmaps. I've used mga_vid for months. I've seen no corruption of anything and my desktop is pretty big. I have dozens of windows with plenty of pixmaps in all of them open all the time across 4 desktops of 1280x1024 @ 32bpp (24bpp with 32bpp framebuffer). 3. mga_vid's API is too simplistic and does not support the a scaling rectangle or line strides like XVIDEO does. Since i've seen mga_vid display video just as xvideo does, i dont see how these other features matter. I can scale an mga_vid window TONS faster than xvideo and doing so repeatedly does not crash X, which doing so with an xvideo window does, as well as slow everything to a grinding halt when it doesn't. 4. Requires a kernel module. Advantages to using mga_vid: 1. Performance gain. It has been arguged that the performance gain is negligible if the XVIDEO driver actually DMA'ed frames to video memory, since AFAICT the card does support it, and it is done by Matrox's binary HAL driver for these cards. For an example of this, see the NVIDIA binary drivers, which use DMA and can get rockstar upload speeds using DMA. Having mplayer render to system memory and then the NVIDIA card upload it using DMA is faster than having mpl
Re: [XFree86] XKeeps Crashing!,
Quoth Panther Wyvern: > I don't know why this is beyond the fonts not being installed and > haven't heard of similar instances. If the fonts are not installed, a > good question might be how are you installing your distribution? If > it's by the retail CDs, then it sounds like RH9's installation is > messing up, which seems strange. If you can get RH9 installed and > running without X, you might want to see if you can find the rpm > containing the necessary fonts and install it from the command line. *sigh* This is about the most Frequently Asked Question on the list. A quick look at the archives provides: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86&m=106865919913597&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86&m=106401155205392&w=2 Or the FAQ: http://xfree86.linuxwiki.org/FAQErrorMessages#head-66113454d1ddc398ffb1e7bce3fb588e7d5dff4d cheers chris ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Lost mouse clicks on Panther
Hi, It seems that since I installed Mac OS X 1.3 (Panther) my X11 is no longer working properly when I try to start KDE on another system and export the display to my Mac. The display shows up OK but its no longer receiving mouse clicks. Has anyone else seen this behavior? Is there a known fix for the problem? Thanks, Eric
[XFree86] XShmSegmentInfo issues
i have a methods in a class to create a shared memory x image - it creates and stores an xImage in the usual way: XShmSegmentInfo shminfo; ximage = XShmCreateImage(..., &shminfo); shminfo.shmid = shmget (.., ximage->height * ximage->bytes_per_line, ...); shminfo.shmaddr = ximage->data = shmat(shminfo.shmid, 0, 0); shminfo.readOnly = False; XShmAttach (display, &shminfo); i call this method in several places and only call XShmPutImage on the xImage later in my code. i get an X error: "X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 144 (MIT-SHM) Minor opcode of failed request: 3 (X_ShmPutImage)" which appears to be because the shared segment info has changed. if i save the shminfo each time and then re-attach it to the display before i call XShmPutImage, i still get the problem. any ideas ? what is the right thing to do here. also - in the code i'm using there is a call to: shmctl ( shmInfo.shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL ); just after it's created - surely this is wrong and i shouldn't remeove the sgm segment until my program is finishing. thanks in advance as always. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] XKeeps Crashing!,
On Thursday 04 December 2003 08:59 pm, Shantanu Gupta stepped up to the podium, took a deep breath and intoned: > Sir, > In the past one week, I had to install RH9 third consecutive time today > because some failure in X server. I am attaching the log file, please > reply back with possible cause of the problem. > Thanking You, I remain > Yours Sincerely, > Shantanu Your problem seems to be that it's not finding a font, as suggested at the end of the log, repeated here: Fatal server error: could not open default font 'fixed' I don't know why this is beyond the fonts not being installed and haven't heard of similar instances. If the fonts are not installed, a good question might be how are you installing your distribution? If it's by the retail CDs, then it sounds like RH9's installation is messing up, which seems strange. If you can get RH9 installed and running without X, you might want to see if you can find the rpm containing the necessary fonts and install it from the command line. Panther ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Publicite sus productos en internet - Santiago - Regiones
Publicite sus productos en navidad Base de datos nacional de e-mail Contactenos al 09-499 59 36 Todos los valores afecto al 10 % Honorarios Santiago... 33.507 $ 50.000 Extencion CL .. 69.424 $ 60.000 Contadores ... 26.187 $ 30.000 P.Amarillas 2003... 6.475 $ 25.000 Hotmail chilenos... 79.000 $ 60.000 Chile.. 400.000 $ 150.000 Regiones Antofagasta 2.720 ... $ 10.000 Arica 1.196 ... $ 5.000 Chillan 1.573 ... $ 5.000 Concepcion 4.776 ... $ 15.000 Copiapo 1.323 ... $ 5.000 Coquimbo 676 ... $ Gratis Iquique 2.465 ... $ 10.000 La Serena 1.874 ... $ 5.000 Los Angeles 571 ... Gratis Osorno 969 ... Gratis P. Montt 938 ... Gratis Punta Arenas ... 1.061 ... $ 3.000 Rancagua ... 2.219 ... $ 10.000 Talca... 1.322 ... $ 5.000 Talcahuano ... 715 ... $ Gratis Temuco ... 2.499 ... $ 10.000 Valdivia ... 1.588 ... $ 5.000 Valparaiso ... 2.895 ... $ 10.000 Viña del Mar ... 2.961 ... $ 10.000 Quinta Region .. 5.951 ... $ 20.000 ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] 2d performance info
Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp > > > enabled > > Does the open source driver use DMA at all? If it doesn't, do the > > higher AGP modes even help at all? > > for matrox? I believe so. I'm sure some drivers do not but i'd > suspect matrox's to. Can you back this up somehow? I have a Matrox G400 card. The open source "mga" driver clearly does not do DMA transfers for MIT-SHM uploads to video memory, nor for XVIDEO (see the source). Using Option "AGPMode" I see no difference at all in SHM or XVIDEO performance. Or did you mean something else by "aggressive with agp enabled" ? > RENDER does not use dma at all, which hinders performance a lot i > would think seeing as how render is used from anti-aliased fonts to > alphablending and the more programs use either the more render's > performance comes into question. How would RENDER use DMA? I know keithp talks about doing things like DMA'ing video data FROM video memory back to system memory in order to do compositing on the CPU, then send it back, but I think that idea is silly. > > > and backing store enabled, > > Is this good or bad? > good for drivers that can use it correctly. Bad for ones that cant. Can you tell me what this feature does and how it would help performance? > > > i'm being held back by this G450 despite all the support for using > > > the backend scaler and triple buffering for video playback that i > > > use often. > > > > Don't trust this. The video stuff is often quite hacky and it's not > > very good, even for this 'well supported' card. Specs are widely > > available yet all of these drivers could still use a ton of work, > > and now the cards are getting quite obsolete. > > Dont trust it in what way? I have a G450, I've hacked mplayer's > matrox driver to utilize the backend scaler for triple buffering and > i've most definitely seen the difference compared to straight xv. It > definitely works well on the G450 and support is nearly non-existant > for any other card in this area as far as i know. OK here is what I know, tell me where you think it is wrong. With mga_vid the application writes directly to video RAM, a performance gain, and it is triple buffered to avoid tearing since the hardware page flips on retrace. XFree86 4.2 (finally) included the patch double buffered XVIDEO in the mga driver. XFree86 is now effectively triple buffered, since applications write to system memory, and you can have one frame queued waiting in video memory. So the only difference between mga_vid and XVIDEO right now is that with XVIDEO, the X server copies the next frame from system memory to video memory, while mga_vid lets the application write to video memory. There is no tearing in either, only a speed difference. Disadvantages to using mga_vid: 1. It is in conflict with the X server and fbcon drivers for the same hardware. Switching VTs while mga_vid is being used causes system crashes. There is no locking for these competing drivers. XVIDEO colour key gets out of sync with the mga_vid colour key. 2. mga_vid assumes the 'end' of video RAM is available and does not coordinate with the X server for allocating video memory. It has been known to cause corruption of the desktop and app pixmaps. 3. mga_vid's API is too simplistic and does not support the a scaling rectangle or line strides like XVIDEO does. 4. Requires a kernel module. Advantages to using mga_vid: 1. Performance gain. It has been arguged that the performance gain is negligible if the XVIDEO driver actually DMA'ed frames to video memory, since AFAICT the card does support it, and it is done by Matrox's binary HAL driver for these cards. For an example of this, see the NVIDIA binary drivers, which use DMA and can get rockstar upload speeds using DMA. Having mplayer render to system memory and then the NVIDIA card upload it using DMA is faster than having mplayer write directly to video memory. It is unclear to me, especially given all of the disadvantages above, that the mga_vid design is the 'right way'. > > > And are there any other 2d Xfree86 benchmarks out there that > > > benchmark the functions and extensions actually used in X these > > > days like render and shape and pixmap manipulation and all that > > > stuff? > > > > I am not sure of one in particular but the ones we like to use for > > supporting our app are mostly just 'x11perf -shmput500' which is > > usually a good indication of what any sort of 2D app would need (at > > least it's a good estimate for video or 2D game performance). > > That's one test of one call. Hardly a measure of performance for the > average X users workload. No, like I said, it's a good indication for 2D video game performance, since it tests how fast MIT-SHM image uploads are. So, what SDL would use to draw graphics on your screen. > Though it is probably the most important c
[XFree86] LCD Phase Problem
X Version: 4.3.0 Video card: AOpen 3D Navigator, and /proc/pci says: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 86C326 5598/6326 (rev 11). Monitor: 15" flat-panel LCD; MAG LT576s I have one slightly more serious problem and one aside. The more serious one: The appearance of the screen varies in vertical bands. This isn't visible when I use 800x600 resolution, but I want to use 1024x768. The variation is subtle, but bothers me (could it hurt the monitor?). It looks like the fonts get bolder and less bold across the window in which they appear. When I adjust the phase using the monitor's controls, the "bold" areas move across the screen. My completely naive guess is that there is some vertical frequency miscommunication. Is there something I can do to fix that? My aside, which might be related: When I try to use the vesa driver, with the vertical frequency line in the configuration file set properly, X will "start" but my monitor turns off the normal display and says: Message VGA mode not support [sic -- means supported?] H: 35.4KHz V: 86.9Hz The H is in range (30-60), but the V is outside (60-75). By the way, my monitor manual includes a list of preset timing modes. Any help would be greatly appreciated. :-) Lachele ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] 2d performance info
Billy Biggs wrote: Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp enabled Does the open source driver use DMA at all? If it doesn't, do the higher AGP modes even help at all? for matrox? I believe so. I'm sure some drivers do not but i'd suspect matrox's to. RENDER does not use dma at all, which hinders performance a lot i would think seeing as how render is used from anti-aliased fonts to alphablending and the more programs use either the more render's performance comes into question. and backing store enabled, Is this good or bad? good for drivers that can use it correctly. Bad for ones that cant. i'm being held back by this G450 despite all the support for using the backend scaler and triple buffering for video playback that i use often. Don't trust this. The video stuff is often quite hacky and it's not very good, even for this 'well supported' card. Specs are widely available yet all of these drivers could still use a ton of work, and now the cards are getting quite obsolete. Dont trust it in what way? I have a G450, I've hacked mplayer's matrox driver to utilize the backend scaler for triple buffering and i've most definitely seen the difference compared to straight xv. It definitely works well on the G450 and support is nearly non-existant for any other card in this area as far as i know. And are there any other 2d Xfree86 benchmarks out there that benchmark the functions and extensions actually used in X these days like render and shape and pixmap manipulation and all that stuff? I am not sure of one in particular but the ones we like to use for supporting our app are mostly just 'x11perf -shmput500' which is usually a good indication of what any sort of 2D app would need (at least it's a good estimate for video or 2D game performance). That's one test of one call. Hardly a measure of performance for the average X users workload. Though it is probably the most important call dealing with performance. I've done it on my G450 athlon system and my P4 nvidia system using xfree86's nv driver and the nv driver completely destroys the G450. But my matrox driver has triple buffered backend scaler video support, something the nv driver doesn't have I believe. ATI however seems to have better hardware support, I'm not sure though because I haven't seen any sort of up to date rundown of video card performance and support (ie. cvs), only for 3d. -Billy ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] intel i810 crash
Hello all, i recently developed a problem with the i810 driver. Got a 855GM chip on a toshiba laptop and it worked fine with 3d acceleration until yesterday.Did run glxgears (well - tried anyway) and the server crashed and didn't come up after reboot or with a different kernel.Did use kernel 2.6-beta10 at the time and also tried with 2.4.22 ck-patched kernel. It will only work with the vesa driver now - reinstalling xfree didn't help anything.I do suspect a hardware failure but are not sure of this. The problem as per output of the xfree log seems to be this: (WW) I810(0): PRB0_CTL (0x0001f001) indicates ring buffer enabled (WW) I810(0): PRB0_HEAD (0x) and PRB0_TAIL (0x08c9) indicate ring buffer not flushed snip ADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x169) isn't on a QWord boundary(==) RandR enabled snip ADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x191) isn't on a QWord boundaryADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x1b9) isn't on a QWord boundaryADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x1d1) isn't on a QWord boundaryADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x1e9) isn't on a QWord boundaryADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x201) isn't on a QWord boundaryADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x219) isn't on a QWord (repeated with different values a couple of times) boundaryADVANCE_LP_RING: outring (0x801) isn't on a QWord boundaryError in I830WaitLpRing(), now is 9483, start is 7482 pgetbl_ctl: 0xffe0001 pgetbl_err: 0x0 ipeir: 0 iphdr: 300 LP ring tail: 8c1 head: 0 len: 1f001 start 7fde000 eir: 0 esr: 1 emr: instdone: ffc1 instpm: 54 memmode: 108 instps: 20 hwstam: ier: 0 imr: iir: 0 space: 128824 wanted 131064 (II) I810(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) I810(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xd0eac000 at 0x40015000 Fatal server error: lockup snip Error in I830WaitLpRing(), now is 14504, start is 12503 pgetbl_ctl: 0xffe0001 pgetbl_err: 0x0 ipeir: 0 iphdr: 300 LP ring tail: 8c9 head: 0 len: 1f001 start 7fde000 eir: 0 esr: 1 emr: instdone: ffc1 instpm: 54 memmode: 108 instps: 20 hwstam: ier: 0 imr: iir: 0 space: 128816 wanted 131064 FatalError re-entered, aborting lockup Can anybody make sense out of this? I'd like to check if it would work with M$ but all i got is a recovery DVD and that will wipe the whole drive. Klaus ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] 2d performance info
Ed Sweetman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp enabled Does the open source driver use DMA at all? If it doesn't, do the higher AGP modes even help at all? > and backing store enabled, Is this good or bad? > i'm being held back by this G450 despite all the support for using the > backend scaler and triple buffering for video playback that i use > often. Don't trust this. The video stuff is often quite hacky and it's not very good, even for this 'well supported' card. Specs are widely available yet all of these drivers could still use a ton of work, and now the cards are getting quite obsolete. > And are there any other 2d Xfree86 benchmarks out there that benchmark > the functions and extensions actually used in X these days like render > and shape and pixmap manipulation and all that stuff? I am not sure of one in particular but the ones we like to use for supporting our app are mostly just 'x11perf -shmput500' which is usually a good indication of what any sort of 2D app would need (at least it's a good estimate for video or 2D game performance). -Billy ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] 2d performance info
I'm fairly sure i've pushed XFree86 as far as i can without reprogramming anything for 2d performance. I've compiled all of X with -march=athlon-tbird -O2 -mmmx -m3dnow -ftracer using modified flag variables in my host.conf as well as profile compiling which i had X up doing my thing for over a day learning my work load before recompiling it with the new data. My config settings for my matrox g450 are aggressive with agp enabled and backing store enabled, memory overclocked. Still though, my g450 is slow, slower than a G400...that's just the way it was made. There are lots of data on card performance in 3d-land as there are easy direct benchmarks. In 2d-land the only real benchmark i've seen is Xmark which uses x11perf which doesn't measure any realistic workload but rather all of X. But even using this, i've yet to find any real listing of which card is the fastest in 2d on a given system by any sites. This means i have to make a decision for nvidia or ati upgrades based on word of mouth which is hardly reliable. I know ati has more open source support and i'm leaning towards them but i'm not sure how much faster those cards would be on a modern system to see if it would be worth spending a hundred or so on a new video card. X is barable, yea, but i know efficiency wise, i'm being held back by this G450 despite all the support for using the backend scaler and triple buffering for video playback that i use often. I refuse to use the binary only drivers from any card maker so that aside, which card has the best xfree86 support these days while being the fastest, ati or nvidia? And are there any other 2d Xfree86 benchmarks out there that benchmark the functions and extensions actually used in X these days like render and shape and pixmap manipulation and all that stuff? Ok that's the end of my rant and questions. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
RE: [XFree86] problem with Geforce 4 card...
Linux distribution ??? version ??? > -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de timex > Enviado el: jueves, 04 de diciembre de 2003 19:11 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: [XFree86] problem with Geforce 4 card... > > > Hi, I have a problem with XFree86. I can't make it work, all > the time it > shows me some bugs (log file attached). My Graphics Card is > nVidia Geforce 4 > Titanium 4200. I have orginal drivers from nVidia site, but I > can't compile Thats driver are binaries not source, you don´t need to compile it What is the exact error ?? > them. My kernel version is 2.4.22. Please help! > > Marcin S. > ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
It always works if you watch it close enough. Actually I changed kernel to the 2.6.0-test11 that just came out. I kept the old configuration except I compiled agpgart as a module instead of being built into the kernel. now glxinfo says it's doing direct rendering!! glxgears gives about 1000 FPS although the gears don't seem to move much faster. Also there seems to be some hesitation or jerkiness in there movements. dmesg: ide1: BM-DMA at 0x2068-0x206f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio hda: IC25N060ATMR04-0, ATA DISK drive ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 hdc: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-K12RA, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 hda: max request size: 1024KiB hda: 117210240 sectors (60011 MB) w/7884KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, UDMA(100) uhci_hcd :00:10.1: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd :00:10.1: irq 5, io base 2020 .. mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice synaptics reset failed synaptics reset failed synaptics reset failed Synaptics Touchpad, model: 1 Firmware: 5.8 180 degree mounted touchpad Sensor: 29 new absolute packet format Touchpad has extended capability bits -> 4 multi-buttons, i.e. besides standard buttons -> multifinger detection -> palm detection input: SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad on isa0060/serio1 serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12 input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard on isa0060/serio0 serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1 Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 0.9.7 (Thu Sep 25 19:16:36 2003 UTC). request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- snd-card-0. error = -16 ALSA device list: No soundcards found. ACPI Debug] String: CMBatt - UPBH.BAT1 [ACPI Debug] Package: Elements Ptr - dfeede68 IP: routing cache hash table of 4096 buckets, 32Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 32768 bind 65536) NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET: Registered protocol family 17 ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 168k freed Adding 2097136k swap on /dev/hda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 EXT3 FS on hda6, internal journal Real Time Clock Driver v1.12 Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones ide-scsi is deprecated for cd burning! Use ide-cd and give dev=/dev/hdX as device scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices Vendor: PIONEER Model: DVD-RW DVR-K12RA Rev: 1.10 Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0, type 5 eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 45e1. ohci_hcd: 2003 Oct 13 USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver (PCI) ohci_hcd: block sizes: ed 64 td 64 [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_09 [ACPI Debug] String: CMBatt - SMSL [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_20 [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_20 via82xx: Assuming DXS channels with 48k fixed sample rate. Please try dxs_support=1 option and report if it works on your machine. PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:11.5 to 64 [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_09 [ACPI Debug] String: CMBatt - SMSL [ACPI Debug] Integer: 00F1 . [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_20 [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_20 [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_09 [ACPI Debug] String: CMBatt - SMSL [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_20 [ACPI Debug] String: QUERY_20 agpgart: Detected VIA KM400/KM400A chipset agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 438M agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xe00>>comment: it seems to have found the chipset on the modprobe agpgart I don't seem to have the radeon here, but it did show up. I'd have to go through the dmesg dumps again to find everything. Right now I'm going to look at the kernel configuration to see if I can turn off the damn ACPI Debug messages. Thanks for the help, Tom Corner --- |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ( 04-Dec-2003 23:54:16 Vienna, Austria ( * * ) mailer: xfmail \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at --- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] problem with Geforce 4 card...
Hi, I have a problem with XFree86. I can't make it work, all the time it shows me some bugs (log file attached). My Graphics Card is nVidia Geforce 4 Titanium 4200. I have orginal drivers from nVidia site, but I can't compile them. My kernel version is 2.4.22. Please help! Marcin S. Xfree86.0 Description: Binary data
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
grep through the dmesg for agp stuff. the kernel log is usually /var/log/messages Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > > take a look at the output of dmesg or your kernel log. You need to > > load via_agp.ko and agpgart.ko and radeon.ko > > > > Alex > demesg is just full of debug messages from acpi and where is the > kernel log? > It's getting late here. > > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can > I > >> figure > >> that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via > >> chipset. So I > >> tried tust the via-agp module and got the same problem. I looked > >> again and the > >> mother board should have a Via ProSavage KN400 chipset. I can't > tell > >> whether > >> that includes the agp. I have agp support built into the kernel, > but > >> the > >> chipset specific stuff shoukd be in the agp modules you saw. I > have > >> loaded > >> basicly all of them and yes Windows says the agp is via, but > via-agp > >> doesn't > >> work. > >> > >> Tom > >> > >> > >> > >> On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > >> > it seem to be an AGP problem: > >> > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available > >> > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the > DRI. > >> > (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart > kernel > >> > mod > --- > |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & > \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ) ( 04-Dec-2003 21:58:47 Vienna, Austria > ( * * ) mailer: xfmail > \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at > --- > ___ > Devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > take a look at the output of dmesg or your kernel log. You need to > load via_agp.ko and agpgart.ko and radeon.ko > > Alex demesg is just full of debug messages from acpi and where is the kernel log? It's getting late here. > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can I >> figure >> that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via >> chipset. So I >> tried tust the via-agp module and got the same problem. I looked >> again and the >> mother board should have a Via ProSavage KN400 chipset. I can't tell >> whether >> that includes the agp. I have agp support built into the kernel, but >> the >> chipset specific stuff shoukd be in the agp modules you saw. I have >> loaded >> basicly all of them and yes Windows says the agp is via, but via-agp >> doesn't >> work. >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: >> > it seem to be an AGP problem: >> > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available >> > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. >> > (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel >> > mod --- |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ( 04-Dec-2003 21:58:47 Vienna, Austria ( * * ) mailer: xfmail \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at --- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
take a look at the output of dmesg or your kernel log. You need to load via_agp.ko and agpgart.ko and radeon.ko Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can I > figure > that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via > chipset. So I > tried tust the via-agp module and got the same problem. I looked > again and the > mother board should have a Via ProSavage KN400 chipset. I can't tell > whether > that includes the agp. I have agp support built into the kernel, but > the > chipset specific stuff shoukd be in the agp modules you saw. I have > loaded > basicly all of them and yes Windows says the agp is via, but via-agp > doesn't > work. > > Tom > > > > On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > > it seem to be an AGP problem: > > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available > > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. > > (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel > > module is loaded before the radeon kernel module. > > > > it looks like you have lots of agp modules loaded (ati_agp, > via_agp, > > sis_agp, amd_k7_agp). AGP in 2.6 is somewhat different than 2.4. > > rather than a single agpgart module it has an agpgart module plus > > various chipset specifc drivers. you need to load the one for you > > chipset. what chipset do you have? > > > > Alex > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > >> > what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod > or > >> your > >> > dmesg? > >> > > >> lsmod: > >> > >> Module Size Used by > >> ati_agp 6284 - > >> via_agp 5600 - > >> sis_agp 3840 - > >> amd_k7_agp 5548 - > >> evdev 7296 - > >> snd_via82xx21568 - > >> ohci_hcd 16000 - > >> ide_scsi 12164 - > >> rtc10600 - > >> > >> > >> > >> XFree86.0.log: > >> _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 > >> _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/wanderer:0 > >> _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for > >> inet6 > >> > >> This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in > any > >> way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches > >> submitted > >> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release > versions, > >> please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository > >> (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). > >> > >> XFree86 Version 4.3.99.16 > >> Release Date: 20 November 2003 > >> X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 > >> Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.0-test10 i686 [ELF] > >> Current Operating System: Linux wanderer 2.6.0-test10 #2 Thu Dec 4 > >> 02:37:18 CET > >> 2003 i686 > >> Build Date: 04 December 2003 > >> Changelog Date: 21 November 2003 > >> Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ > >> to make sure that you have the latest version. > >> Module Loader present > >> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > >> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > >> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) > unknown. > >> (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 4 17:31:00 > >> 2003 > >> (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" > >> (==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout" > >> (**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0) > >> (**) | |-->Monitor "flatpanel" > >> (**) | |-->Device "radeon-9200" > >> (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1" > >> (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1" > >> (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30" > >> (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" > >> (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" > >> (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > >> (**) XKB: model: "pc105" > >> (**) Option "XkbLayout" "de" > >> (**) XKB: layout: "de" > >> (**) Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > >> (**) XKB: variant: "nodeadkeys" > >> (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled > >> (**) FontPath set to > >> > > > "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib > > /X > >> 11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/ > >> > > > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr > > /X > >> 11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fo > >> nts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > >> (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > >> (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > >> (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device) > >> (II) Module ABI versions: > >> XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 > >> XFree86 Video Driver: 0.7 > >> XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 > >> XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 > >> XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 > >> (II) Loader running on linux > >> (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" > >> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a > >> (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > >> compiled f
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
You found that quickly. I don't know what the chipset is. How can I figure that out? I am researching the kernel. Their ads sayit has a via chipset. So I tried tust the via-agp module and got the same problem. I looked again and the mother board should have a Via ProSavage KN400 chipset. I can't tell whether that includes the agp. I have agp support built into the kernel, but the chipset specific stuff shoukd be in the agp modules you saw. I have loaded basicly all of them and yes Windows says the agp is via, but via-agp doesn't work. Tom On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > it seem to be an AGP problem: > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available > (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. > (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel > module is loaded before the radeon kernel module. > > it looks like you have lots of agp modules loaded (ati_agp, via_agp, > sis_agp, amd_k7_agp). AGP in 2.6 is somewhat different than 2.4. > rather than a single agpgart module it has an agpgart module plus > various chipset specifc drivers. you need to load the one for you > chipset. what chipset do you have? > > Alex > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: >> > what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod or >> your >> > dmesg? >> > >> lsmod: >> >> Module Size Used by >> ati_agp 6284 - >> via_agp 5600 - >> sis_agp 3840 - >> amd_k7_agp 5548 - >> evdev 7296 - >> snd_via82xx21568 - >> ohci_hcd 16000 - >> ide_scsi 12164 - >> rtc10600 - >> >> >> >> XFree86.0.log: >> _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 >> _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/wanderer:0 >> _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for >> inet6 >> >> This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any >> way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches >> submitted >> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, >> please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository >> (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). >> >> XFree86 Version 4.3.99.16 >> Release Date: 20 November 2003 >> X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 >> Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.0-test10 i686 [ELF] >> Current Operating System: Linux wanderer 2.6.0-test10 #2 Thu Dec 4 >> 02:37:18 CET >> 2003 i686 >> Build Date: 04 December 2003 >> Changelog Date: 21 November 2003 >> Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ >> to make sure that you have the latest version. >> Module Loader present >> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, >> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, >> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. >> (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 4 17:31:00 >> 2003 >> (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" >> (==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout" >> (**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0) >> (**) | |-->Monitor "flatpanel" >> (**) | |-->Device "radeon-9200" >> (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1" >> (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1" >> (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30" >> (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" >> (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" >> (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" >> (**) XKB: model: "pc105" >> (**) Option "XkbLayout" "de" >> (**) XKB: layout: "de" >> (**) Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" >> (**) XKB: variant: "nodeadkeys" >> (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled >> (**) FontPath set to >> > "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib > /X >> 11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/ >> > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr > /X >> 11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fo >> nts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" >> (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" >> (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" >> (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device) >> (II) Module ABI versions: >> XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 >> XFree86 Video Driver: 0.7 >> XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 >> XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 >> XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 >> (II) Loader running on linux >> (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" >> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a >> (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" >> compiled for 4.3.99.16, module version = 1.0.0 >> Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer >> ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4 >> (II) Loading font Bitmap >> (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" >> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a >> (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" >> compiled for 4.3.99.16, module version = 1.0.0 >> ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.7
Re: [XFree86] strange fonts after updating to 4.3.0
Heya. If no one here knows anything about this, does anyone know where else I might find some information? Is there a mailing list for xft or otherwise dealing with fonts in X? I've found no readme, faq or archived message with relative information anywhere. Panther On Wednesday 03 December 2003 02:01 pm, Panther Wyvern stepped up to the podium, took a deep breath and intoned: > Hi. I recently updated to Xfree 4.3.0. Everything has gone smoothly but > for a strange font problem I've not found mention of anywhere. Truetype > fonts seem to be the problem. They all replace capital letters with odd > characters. For instance, Google's web site uses font family: Arial. When > I load that page, all the lower case letters are in uppercase and the > capital letters are changed so that Google becomes 'OOGLE, Search becomes > 3EARCH, Directory becomes $IRECTORY, News becomes .EWS and the like. > There's also an awful lot of spaces between some of the words. I've found > the same to be true in all KDE applications that can change fonts, Mozilla, > Opera and Open Office.org. > > Testing in a word processor shows the problem happens with Time New Roman, > Arial, Bookman L Ee (though not Bookman L), Century Schoolbook and Chancery > L Ee (though not Chancery L), among others. The test further shows that > when using the fonts that have the problem, typing a to z in lower case > shows all uppercase and typing A to Z in uppercase shows: > > !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789: > > As I pointed out previously, in some similar fonts (like Chancery L Ee and > Chancery L), it happens with one and not the other. > > I'm not sure what further information to give at this point that would be > relevant to my issue. > > I might add, maybe, that I'm using Linux on x86 architecture. I hope > someone can help me with this. > > Panther > > ___ > XFree86 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Gnome desktop, terminal problems in overlay (8+24-bit) mode.
Hello, all. I just got overlay mode working on my MGA dual-head (via two cards) setup, and it's got some problems: 1) The Gnome panel and Nautilus desktop background are both in 8-bit color mode. 2) My Gnome terminal (using monospace 10 with custom colors) and xterms have suddenly had all the text vanish. I can't even cause highlighting with the mouse where the text is to make it go reverse-video. (Though the text does paste just fine from the "clipboard", so I -know- it's there.) Other apps -- eg., Mozilla, the Gimp -- work fine. Any ideas/suggestions? I've Googled some, but haven't found anything that might actually help to remedy these issues. Thanks, Ken D'Ambrosio ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] resolution probs - GF4ti
According to the PDF on ADI's web site, this should be: HorizSync30 - 96 VertRefresh 50 - 160 That should be capable of 1600x1200 @ 75Hz Mark. http://www.adi.com.tw/Menu%20Download%20c.htm On 4 Dec 2003, Jeff wrote: > Thanks, I have an ADI Microscan M900 so it looks like I have picked the > wrong monitor. > > Does anyone have the correct config for an M900 - it's not listed in the > X monitor list. > > thanks again. > Jeff > > > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 06:00, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > Section "Monitor" > > Identifier "Monitor0" > > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > > ModelName"ADI MicroScan 17X+" > > HorizSync24.6 - 60.0 > > VertRefresh 50.0 - 120.0 > > Option "dpms" > > EndSection > > > >If those specs are correct, that monitor cannot do 1600x1200. > > If it can do 1600x1200 then those specs are incorrect. > > > > > > Mark. > > > > > > On 4 Dec 2003, Jeff wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > Ive got a geforce 4ti 4200 AGP8x and cant get the resolution above > > > 1280x960. I'm running the latest nvidia drivers - are there any problems > > > with them?! > > > > > > my config is attached.I have even tried commenting out all other > > > resolutions apart from 1600x1200 (the res i want) with no luck. > > > > > > I know both the monitor and gfx card support 1600x1200 - it works under > > > windoze > > > > > > all help appreciated > > > Jeff > > > > > > > ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
it seem to be an AGP problem: (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI. (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel module is loaded before the radeon kernel module. it looks like you have lots of agp modules loaded (ati_agp, via_agp, sis_agp, amd_k7_agp). AGP in 2.6 is somewhat different than 2.4. rather than a single agpgart module it has an agpgart module plus various chipset specifc drivers. you need to load the one for you chipset. what chipset do you have? Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > > what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod or > your > > dmesg? > > > lsmod: > > Module Size Used by > ati_agp 6284 - > via_agp 5600 - > sis_agp 3840 - > amd_k7_agp 5548 - > evdev 7296 - > snd_via82xx21568 - > ohci_hcd 16000 - > ide_scsi 12164 - > rtc10600 - > > > > XFree86.0.log: > _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 > _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/wanderer:0 > _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for > inet6 > > This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any > way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches > submitted > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, > please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository > (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). > > XFree86 Version 4.3.99.16 > Release Date: 20 November 2003 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 > Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.0-test10 i686 [ELF] > Current Operating System: Linux wanderer 2.6.0-test10 #2 Thu Dec 4 > 02:37:18 CET > 2003 i686 > Build Date: 04 December 2003 > Changelog Date: 21 November 2003 > Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ > to make sure that you have the latest version. > Module Loader present > Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 4 17:31:00 > 2003 > (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" > (==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout" > (**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0) > (**) | |-->Monitor "flatpanel" > (**) | |-->Device "radeon-9200" > (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1" > (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1" > (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30" > (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" > (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" > (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" > (**) XKB: model: "pc105" > (**) Option "XkbLayout" "de" > (**) XKB: layout: "de" > (**) Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" > (**) XKB: variant: "nodeadkeys" > (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled > (**) FontPath set to > "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X > 11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/ > usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X > 11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fo > nts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" > (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" > (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device) > (II) Module ABI versions: > XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 > XFree86 Video Driver: 0.7 > XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 > XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 > XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 > (II) Loader running on linux > (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a > (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.3.99.16, module version = 1.0.0 > Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer > ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4 > (II) Loading font Bitmap > (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" > (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a > (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.3.99.16, module version = 1.0.0 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.7 > (--) using VT number 7 > > (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 > (II) PCI: Config type is 1 > (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8090, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 > (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) > (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1106,3205 card 1106,7205 rev 00 class > 06,00,00 hdr 00 > (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1106,b168 card , rev 00 class > 06,04,00 hdr 01 > (II) PCI: 00:07:0: chip 104c,ac50 card , rev 02 class > 06,07,00 hdr 02 > (II) PCI: 00:08:0: chip 104c,8026 card 1025,0033 rev 00 class > 0c,00,10 hdr 00 > (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 10ec,8180 card 10ec,8180 rev 20 class > 02,00,00 hdr 00 > (II) PCI: 00:10:0: chip 1106,3038 card 1025,0033 rev 80 class > 0c,03,00 hdr 80 > (II) P
RE: [XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
On 04-Dec-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod or your > dmesg? > lsmod: Module Size Used by ati_agp 6284 - via_agp 5600 - sis_agp 3840 - amd_k7_agp 5548 - evdev 7296 - snd_via82xx21568 - ohci_hcd 16000 - ide_scsi 12164 - rtc10600 - XFree86.0.log: _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/wanderer:0 _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6 This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions, please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository (http://www.XFree86.Org/cvs). XFree86 Version 4.3.99.16 Release Date: 20 November 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.0-test10 i686 [ELF] Current Operating System: Linux wanderer 2.6.0-test10 #2 Thu Dec 4 02:37:18 CET 2003 i686 Build Date: 04 December 2003 Changelog Date: 21 November 2003 Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.Org/ to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 4 17:31:00 2003 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config" (==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "flatpanel" (**) | |-->Device "radeon-9200" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse1" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1" (**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30" (**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" (**) XKB: rules: "xfree86" (**) Option "XkbModel" "pc105" (**) XKB: model: "pc105" (**) Option "XkbLayout" "de" (**) XKB: layout: "de" (**) Option "XkbVariant" "nodeadkeys" (**) XKB: variant: "nodeadkeys" (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) FontPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/local/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X 11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/ usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,/usr/X 11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fo nts/75dpi/,/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" (**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" (WW) Open APM failed (/dev/apm_bios) (No such device) (II) Module ABI versions: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 XFree86 Video Driver: 0.7 XFree86 XInput driver : 0.4 XFree86 Server Extension : 0.2 XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.4 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.3.99.16, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.4 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project" compiled for 4.3.99.16, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.7 (--) using VT number 7 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8090, mode1Res1 = 0x8000 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1106,3205 card 1106,7205 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1106,b168 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:07:0: chip 104c,ac50 card , rev 02 class 06,07,00 hdr 02 (II) PCI: 00:08:0: chip 104c,8026 card 1025,0033 rev 00 class 0c,00,10 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:09:0: chip 10ec,8180 card 10ec,8180 rev 20 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:10:0: chip 1106,3038 card 1025,0033 rev 80 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:1: chip 1106,3038 card 1025,0033 rev 80 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:2: chip 1106,3038 card 1025,0033 rev 80 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:3: chip 1106,3104 card 1025,0033 rev 82 class 0c,03,20 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 1106,3177 card 1025,0033 rev 00 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:11:1: chip 1106,0571 card 1025,0033 rev 06 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:5: chip 1106,3059 card 1025,0033 rev 50 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:6: chip 1106,3068 card 1025,0033 rev 80 class 07,80,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:12:0: chip 1106,3065 card 1025,0033 rev 74 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,5c61 card 1025,0033 rev 01 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,2), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II)
[XFree86] AFTER-HOURS TRADING - Breaking News...%CUSTOM_MINE
AFTER-HOURS TRADING - BREAKING NEWS
Get Quote - http://quote.money.cnn.com/quote/quote?symbols=htds
Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated - HTDS - Announces: Receipt of Tubercin Toxicity
Study and Formation of Scientific Advisory Panel - Wednesday December 3, 8:04 pm ET
DELRAY BEACH, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 3, 2003--Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated
(Pink Sheets: HTDS) announces today that the spokesperson for the independent medical
group conducting the testing for HTTD (HTDS) has forwarded the formal Testing Results
of Tubercin®'s Toxicity Trials to HTTD.
Tubercin of five different concentrations was administered to five groups of mice. A
pathologist at the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center performed autopsies.
The mice were randomized and only the control mouse was known to the pathologist, as
stated in the cover letter of the Pathology Report.
The report concludes, "All tissues evaluated, visceral organs and the brain were
essentially normal in appearance." "The importance of this report is even better than
I expected," stated the spokesperson for the medical group. "As the testing continues
and if the results are similar to those of Chemotherapy and or radiation with no
harmful side effects, Tubercin has enormous potential for the treatment of cancer and
the immune system."
The President and CEO of HTTD, Mr. Colm J. King is in the process of forming a
Scientific Advisory Panel with leading Oncologists and Immunologists from prestigious
institutions in the U.S. The panel will review the reports and results of Tubercin®'s
findings and will report back to Mr. King with the ongoing reports in layman language
for the shareholders.
"We are continuing to receive promising results regarding Tubercin® and we're looking
forward to additional positive results in the near future," stated Mr. King. "These
tests prove that Tubercin® is non-toxic and is the first step on the way to human
clinical trials as well as the first positive breakthrough conducted in the United
States with an independent medical group for Tubercin®.
Operating out of Delray Beach, Florida, Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated ("HTTD")
holds the international marketing rights, except South Korea, to Tubercin®, a patented
immunostimulant developed for combating Cancer under medical patent (US Patent
6,274,356). The unique properties unlike other cancer products are clearly stated in
the abstract summary of the patent... "A carbohydrate complex, which is a mixture of
low molecular-weight polysaccharides of an arabinomannan structure extracted from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is highly effective in treating various cancer patients
without incurring any adverse side effects."
Statements in this press release that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Those
statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of
the Company and its management. Such statements reflect management's current views,
are based on certain assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results,
events, or performance may differ materially from the above forward-looking statements
due to a number of important factors, and will be dependent upon a variety of factors,
including, but not limited to, our ability to obtain additional financing and access
funds from our existing financing arrangements that will allow us to continue our
current and future operations and whether demand for our product and testing service
in domestic and international markets will continue to expand. The Company undertakes
no obligation to publicly update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that occur after the date hereof or to reflect any change in the
Company's expectations with regard to these forward-looking statements or the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
cvke bokinqffdcfkactdoecw dbyh itil
yllh
d eo
[XFree86] ASUS laptop crash with SiS
Hi Dear Sir I installed Linux on my ASUS L3500 AMD XP2000 laptop, from a Knoppix Debian release, that comes with all... It were not possible to boot from knoppix CD until I stated : boot: knoppix xmodule=fbdev but now that is installed on HD, I changed Driver to SiS Driver and no possibility to boot :-( no screen, I cannot specify at boot what I was able to do with CDROM boot (knoppix xmodule=fbdev) ALT-CTRL F2 or ... dosen't work and everything hangs up right after trying to (automatically) start X !!! anyway to recover the crash and goes back to a safer mode. Please help me as soon as possible. Thanks in advance, yours sincerly, Lotfi. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Dual head display on Radeon 9800pro under FreeBSD
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:56:16AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote: > easy fix. change this line: > Screen "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" > to this: > Screen "Screen1" LeftOf "Screen0" I tried that and it doesn't change the monitor order around. Starting x still brings up all my default apps on the rightmost screen. The only change that made was that instead of moving my mouse to the right to get the leftmost screen, I could now move the mouse to the left to get to the leftmost screen. -- Wayne Pascoe Everything to excess. To enjoy the flavour of life, take big bites. Moderation is for monks. - Robert Heinlein ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Re: can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
what does your xfree86 log say? how about the output of lsmod or your dmesg? Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have tried everything. I have kernel 2.6.0test10 with radeon > module(radeon.ko). I am running on an Acer 1355LMi_ATI laptop with a > Radeon > mobility 9200. I have loaded glx and dri in XF86Config. I have > radeon selected > as device. When this didn't work I went to the dri wiki web site and > loaded > and installed their latest package. Oh I forgot to mention I > downloaded > compiled and installed XFree86-4.3.99.16.tar.bz2. That is my current > setup. > When the radeon module from dri didn't help I went back to the > radeon.ko module > from 2.6.0test10. > > glxinfo says: (more from me after) > > name of display: :0.0 > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: No > server glx vendor string: SGI > server glx version string: 1.2 > server glx extensions: > GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, > GLX_EXT_import_context, > GLX_SGI_make_current_read > client glx vendor string: SGI > client glx version string: 1.2 > client glx extensions: > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, > GLX_EXT_import_context, > GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, > GLX_MESA_allocate_memory, > GLX_MESA_swap_control, GLX_MESA_swap_frame_usage, > GLX_OML_swap_method, > GLX_OML_sync_control, GLX_SGI_make_current_read, > GLX_SGI_swap_control, > GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, > GLX_SGIX_visual_select_group > GLX extensions: > GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_EXT_import_context, > GLX_EXT_visual_info, > GLX_EXT_visual_rating > OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect > OpenGL version string: 1.4 Mesa 5.0.2 > OpenGL extensions: > GL_ARB_depth_texture, GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, > GL_ARB_point_parameters, GL_ARB_shadow, GL_ARB_shadow_ambient, > GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp, GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, > GL_ARB_texture_env_add, GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, > GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3, > GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat, GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, > GL_ARB_window_pos, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_bgra, GL_EXT_blend_color, > GL_EXT_blend_func_separate, GL_EXT_blend_logic_op, > GL_EXT_blend_minmax, > GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint, > GL_EXT_copy_texture, > GL_EXT_draw_range_elements, GL_EXT_fog_coord, > GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays, > GL_EXT_packed_pixels, GL_EXT_polygon_offset, > GL_EXT_rescale_normal, > GL_EXT_secondary_color, GL_EXT_separate_specular_color, > GL_EXT_shadow_funcs, GL_EXT_stencil_two_side, > GL_EXT_stencil_wrap, > GL_EXT_subtexture, GL_EXT_texture, GL_EXT_texture3D, > GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp, GL_EXT_texture_env_add, > GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3, > GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias, GL_EXT_texture_object, > GL_EXT_texture_rectangle, > GL_EXT_vertex_array, GL_APPLE_packed_pixels, > GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once, > GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3, GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat, > GL_MESA_pack_invert, GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture, GL_NV_blend_square, > GL_NV_texgen_reflection, GL_NV_texture_rectangle, > GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap, > GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp, GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp, > GL_SGIS_texture_lod, GL_SGIX_depth_texture, GL_SGIX_shadow, > GL_SGIX_shadow_ambient > glu version: 1.3 > glu extensions: > GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess > >visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav > id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat > -- > 0x23 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > None > 0x24 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 > None > 0x25 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 > None > 0x26 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 > None > 0x27 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > None > 0x28 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 > None > 0x29 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 > None > 0x2a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 > None > > should I go back to kernel 2.4.22? Should I use the dri wiki? Should > I try the > XFree86 CVS? Should I try ATI's package again. They don't seem to > have put > much work into it. > > Thanks, > > Tom Corner > > > --- > |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & > \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ) ( 04-Dec-2003 17:34:42 Vienna, Austria > ( * * ) mailer: xfmail > \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at > --- > ___ > Devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http:/
RE: [XFree86] cannot run X server
One thing you can do is take the system into single user mode and modify your inittab to remove the default runlevel from 5 to 3. Reboot the system. This will allow the system to come up but XWindows will not start. This will give you a chance to fix your Xwindows. Once that is fixed you can run a startx manaully to see if X will start. If not try again. Al Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vollman, Mike Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [XFree86] cannot run X server When I turn on my computer I can not open up the gui interface for redhat linux 7 due to an X server error. The screen blinks on and off a couple of times and then drops into a diagnostic mode which does not take care of the problem. The contents of the log /var/log/XFree86.0.log are as follows: Collect: Cannot write ./dfh3IOlLR008742 (sm_io_flush||sm_io_error, uid=51, gid=51): Input/output error Queueup: cannot create queue temp file ./tfhB3IOlLR008742, uid=51 permission denied I have a lot of important files on this machine that I cannot touch in single user mode because they are windows files held within vmware. Any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated. Thank You Mike Vollman Administrator Sarcom Information Services <>
[XFree86] i810 fails to set refresh rate above 60hz
I'm running Fedora Core (XFree86 4.3.0) on a Dell Dimension 2400 with a 19" Daytek DT-95P monitor. It's i810 / 845G graphics. I can change resolutions, but I can't seem to get the refresh rate above 60hz. (Windows XP has no problem using higher refresh rates at the same resolutions / color depths.) The monitor is not one of the listed models but I'm pretty sure I entered the specs right. The relevant error in the log seems to be: (WW) I810(0): Extended BIOS function 0x5f05 not supported. (WW) I810(0): Failed to set refresh rate to 75Hz. I've searched on the internet and found a few similar problems, but no solutions. As you can see, I've tried entering Modelines (generated with videogen) but that didn't seem to help. I also tried Option "NoDDC" (didn't help) and Option "IgnoreEDID" (this killed X). 60hz really sucks so any help would be greatly appreciated! andrew Here are my XF86Config and XFree86.0.log # XFree86 4 configuration created by redhat-config-xfree86 Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "single head configuration" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" InputDevice"DevInputMice" "AlwaysCore" EndSection Section "Files" # RgbPath is the location of the RGB database. Note, this is the name of the # file minus the extension (like ".txt" or ".db"). There is normally # no need to change the default. # Multiple FontPath entries are allowed (they are concatenated together) # By default, Red Hat 6.0 and later now use a font server independent of # the X server to render fonts. RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" FontPath "unix/:7100" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "extmod" Load "fbdevhw" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "freetype" Load "type1" Load "dri" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # Specify which keyboard LEDs can be user-controlled (eg, with xset(1)) # Option "Xleds" "1 2 3" # To disable the XKEYBOARD extension, uncomment XkbDisable. # Option "XkbDisable" # To customise the XKB settings to suit your keyboard, modify the # lines below (which are the defaults). For example, for a non-U.S. # keyboard, you will probably want to use: # Option "XkbModel" "pc102" # If you have a US Microsoft Natural keyboard, you can use: # Option "XkbModel" "microsoft" # # Then to change the language, change the Layout setting. # For example, a german layout can be obtained with: # Option "XkbLayout" "de" # or: # Option "XkbLayout" "de" # Option "XkbVariant""nodeadkeys" # # If you'd like to switch the positions of your capslock and # control keys, use: # Option "XkbOptions""ctrl:swapcaps" # Or if you just want both to be control, use: # Option "XkbOptions""ctrl:nocaps" # Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2" Option "Device" "/dev/psaux" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" EndSection Section "InputDevice" # If the normal CorePointer mouse is not a USB mouse then # this input device can be used in AlwaysCore mode to let you # also use USB mice at the same time. Identifier "DevInputMice" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2" Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Daytek" ModelName"DT-95P" HorizSync30.0 - 95.0 VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 Option "dpms" Modeline "1024x768" 77.57 1024 1056 1152 1280 768 770 773 808 # 78 MHz, 60.6 kHz, 75.0 Hz Modeline "1152x864" 98.17 1152 1184 1280 1440 864 866 869 909 # 98 MHz, 68.2 kHz, 75.0 Hz Modeline "1280x960" 121.32 1280 1320 1416 1600 960 962 965 1011 # 121 MHz, 75.8 kHz, 75.0 Hz Modeline "1280x1024" 129.36 1280 1320 1416 1600 1024 1026 1030 1078 # 129 MHz, 80.9 kHz, 75.0 Hz Modeline "1600x1200" 189.45 1600 1648 1744 2000 1200 1202 1206 1263 # 189 MHz, 94.7 kHz, 75.0 Hz # Modeline "1024x768" 87.91 1024 1056 1152 1280 768 770 773 808 # 88 MHz, 68.7 kHz, 85.0 Hz # Modeline "1152x864" 111.26 1152 1184 1280 1440 864 866 869 909 # 111 MHz, 77.3 kHz, 85.0 Hz # Modeline "1280x960" 137.50 1280 1320 1416 1600 960 962 966 1011 # 137 MHz, 85.9 kHz, 85.0 Hz # Modeline "1280x1024" 146.61 1280 1320 1416 1600 1024 1026 1030 1078 # 147 MHz, 91.6 kHz, 85.0 Hz # Modeline "1600x1200" 190.00 160
[XFree86] can't get direct 3D with Radeon 9200
I have tried everything. I have kernel 2.6.0test10 with radeon module(radeon.ko). I am running on an Acer 1355LMi_ATI laptop with a Radeon mobility 9200. I have loaded glx and dri in XF86Config. I have radeon selected as device. When this didn't work I went to the dri wiki web site and loaded and installed their latest package. Oh I forgot to mention I downloaded compiled and installed XFree86-4.3.99.16.tar.bz2. That is my current setup. When the radeon module from dri didn't help I went back to the radeon.ko module from 2.6.0test10. glxinfo says: (more from me after) name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0 direct rendering: No server glx vendor string: SGI server glx version string: 1.2 server glx extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_SGI_make_current_read client glx vendor string: SGI client glx version string: 1.2 client glx extensions: GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_MESA_allocate_memory, GLX_MESA_swap_control, GLX_MESA_swap_frame_usage, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_OML_sync_control, GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_visual_select_group GLX extensions: GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect OpenGL version string: 1.4 Mesa 5.0.2 OpenGL extensions: GL_ARB_depth_texture, GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_point_parameters, GL_ARB_shadow, GL_ARB_shadow_ambient, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp, GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, GL_ARB_texture_env_add, GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3, GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat, GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_ARB_window_pos, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_bgra, GL_EXT_blend_color, GL_EXT_blend_func_separate, GL_EXT_blend_logic_op, GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint, GL_EXT_copy_texture, GL_EXT_draw_range_elements, GL_EXT_fog_coord, GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays, GL_EXT_packed_pixels, GL_EXT_polygon_offset, GL_EXT_rescale_normal, GL_EXT_secondary_color, GL_EXT_separate_specular_color, GL_EXT_shadow_funcs, GL_EXT_stencil_two_side, GL_EXT_stencil_wrap, GL_EXT_subtexture, GL_EXT_texture, GL_EXT_texture3D, GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp, GL_EXT_texture_env_add, GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3, GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias, GL_EXT_texture_object, GL_EXT_texture_rectangle, GL_EXT_vertex_array, GL_APPLE_packed_pixels, GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once, GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3, GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat, GL_MESA_pack_invert, GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture, GL_NV_blend_square, GL_NV_texgen_reflection, GL_NV_texture_rectangle, GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap, GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp, GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp, GL_SGIS_texture_lod, GL_SGIX_depth_texture, GL_SGIX_shadow, GL_SGIX_shadow_ambient glu version: 1.3 glu extensions: GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat -- 0x23 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None 0x24 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 None 0x25 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x26 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x27 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 None 0x28 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 0 0 None 0x29 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None 0x2a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 None should I go back to kernel 2.4.22? Should I use the dri wiki? Should I try the XFree86 CVS? Should I try ATI's package again. They don't seem to have put much work into it. Thanks, Tom Corner --- |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ( 04-Dec-2003 17:34:42 Vienna, Austria ( * * ) mailer: xfmail \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at --- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Where do I find xf86config?
Hi. Trying to run xfree86 in win2000. Installed from cygwin and selected all items in xfree86 using startxwin start xwin :0 -query An empty x-window shows up covering the desktop but no response from the unix server. Where would I find the xf86config file? Where should I find the config program? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
Re: [XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D
Like I said before: If you MB is 8x you will need to patch your 2.4 kernel with 8x support (or if you can set your BIOS to 4x only mode) or use a 2.6 kernel. once you have that done you can just use the DRI snapshots. This will allow you to use 4x mode. if you want to use 8x, you will have to apply michel/hui's, or keith's 8x patch. Alex --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got my new machine with the Radeon 9200. I want to try and > setup the > hardware 3D support for it. I am going to build the latest > development > snapshot and or the CVS and try to set it up. How stable are these? > Do you > have any tips or suggestions on the building or configuration? Is > there an > easier way? > > Thanks, > > Tom Corner > > On 20-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > > one thing you will run into is that if your new motherboard > supports 8x > > and your radeon supports 8x, you will need a patched version of > agpgart > > that supports 8x or the DRI will not work if you are using linux > 2.4.x. > > 2.6 supports 8x natively. Just a heads up. > > > > Alex > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I signed onto the developer list too now. When the computer comes, > I > >> am > >> thinking of trying driver snapshots or CVS versions. I have heard > >> that ATI does > >> not support their own driver very well. > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> Tom > >> > >> On 20-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > >> > The drivers do not currently have support for agp 8x. Michel > has a > >> > patch on his website from ati, but it hasn't been applied/tested > >> yet as > >> > far as I know. I don't have the link off hand. I doubt you > will > >> > notice any difference between 8x and 4x. > >> > > >> > Let me know how it goes. > >> > > >> > Alex > >> > > >> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> Thanks. I don't get to test it until the laptop with radeon > >> mobility > >> >> 9200 > >> >> comes next week. I understand the 9200 is the same as the 9000 > >> >> except that the > >> >> agp is 8x instead of 4x. Can I specify agp 8x to take > advantage > >> of > >> >> the higher > >> >> speed? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks again, > >> >> > >> >> Tom Corner > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > __ > >> > Do you Yahoo!? > >> > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now > >> > http://companion.yahoo.com/ > >> > ___ > >> > Devel mailing list > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> > >> --- > >> |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & > >> \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> ) ( 20-Nov-2003 16:50:41 Vienna, Austria > >> ( * * ) mailer: xfmail > >> \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at > >> --- > >> ___ > >> Devel mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > > __ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard > > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree > > ___ > > XFree86 mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 > > --- > |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & > \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ) ( 04-Dec-2003 11:47:41 Vienna, Austria > ( * * ) mailer: xfmail > \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at > --- > ___ > XFree86 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 > ___ > Devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Unsupported AGP Card SiS 300/305 (32MB)
Hello To start with, i am a novice in using linux software. i have installed linux redhat 9 (in text mode as my AGP card is not supported). i get this report before i reach to my log in as root:- Module loader present OS kernel : linux version 2.4.20-8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] .com Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from comd line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (ww) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown (==) log file:"/var/log/xfree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 4 20:06:03 .. (==) using cofig file"/etc/x11/xf86config" (EE) VGA(0): virtual height (0) is too small for hardware (min 1) log file/var/log/xfree86.0.log Hopefully i am able to make sense of the prob i have. and i have not been a bafoon boring you. thanking you in anticipation. Kinzain
Re: [XFree86] ASUS laptop crash with SiS
Lotfi BAGHLI wrote: Hi Dear Sir I installed Linux on my ASUS L3500 AMD XP2000 laptop, from a Knoppix Debian release, that comes with all... It were not possible to boot from knoppix CD until I stated : boot: knoppix xmodule=fbdev but now that is installed on HD, I changed Driver to SiS Driver and no possibility to boot :-( no screen, I cannot specify at boot what I was able to do with CDROM boot (knoppix xmodule=fbdev) ALT-CTRL F2 or ... dosen't work and everything hangs up right after trying to (automatically) start X !!! anyway to recover the crash and goes back to a safer mode. You need a newer sis XFree86 driver for this machine. Either wait for 4.4, or go to my website for drivers for 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria thomas AT winischhofer DOT net *** http://www.winischhofer.net/ twini AT xfree86 DOT org ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Dual head display on Radeon 9800pro under FreeBSD
easy fix. change this line: Screen "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" to this: Screen "Screen1" LeftOf "Screen0" Alex -- Hi all, I'm trying to get a dual headed display running on FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE. My hardware is as follows: Samsung SyncMaster 171sTFT plugged into the DVI port using a converter Iiyama Vision Master Pro 410 The CRT is in the center of my desk, and the Samsung TFT is to the right of that. I want the leftmost monitor (the CRT) to be the primary screen. Under Windows, the Iiyama is the first screen and the Samsung is the second screen. This is how I want it to be. I've finally got an extended desktop setup running under XFree86, but still have one problem that I cannot resolve - Namely that my monitors are the wrong way around. When I startx from the command line, XFree86 starts, and my application run from my .xinitrc (ssh-add) appears on the TFT monitor. The mouse is also on this monitor. I want this app and the mouse to appear on the CRT if at all possible. I would like the CRT to be the primary monitor with the TFT as secondary. If anyone could shed some light on how to do this, I would be most greatful. I've tried switching card1 and card0, and also monitor1 and monitor0 around in my XF86Config file but this doesn't seem to help. My config file can be found at http://www.penguinpowered.org/wayne/XF86Config Thanks in advance, -- Wayne Pascoe If you hurt her, I'll hunt you down and kill you with a shovel... A vague disclaimer is no-one's friend. __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] xfs dead but pid file exists on linux 7.3
Hi, I have isntalled Red HAT Linux 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18-13) with X server. This is running fine on other servers. But today i when i rung Xconfigurator and to test its working fine means GUI mode is coming while testing by Xconfigurator but after that when i tried with startx. Its giving following error message. I checked xfs service and found that its not running properly. [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs statusxfs dead but pid file exists. I also tried to remove the pid file and resarted service but same result. I have treid to reinsall xfs package but still problem exist.Please help me to resolve this problem ASAP. =) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 4 19:10:35 2003(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4" [10e] 320 x 200, 70Hz [133] 320 x 240, 72Hz [143] 400 x 300, 72Hz [153] 512 x 384, 70Hz [11d] 640 x 400, 70Hz [111] 640 x 480, 85Hz, 75Hz, 72Hz, 60Hz [173] 720 x 480, 75Hz [17e] 720 x 576, 75Hz [114] 800 x 600, 85Hz, 75Hz, 72Hz, 60Hz, 56Hz [117] 1024 x 768, 85Hz, 75Hz, 70Hz, 60Hz [163] 1152 x 864, 75Hz, 70Hz, 60Hz [11a] 1280 x 1024, 85Hz, 75Hz, 60Hz [122] 1600 x 1200, 60Hz(WW) SAVAGE(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xf000,0x80)Could not init font path element unix/:7100, removing from list! Fatal server error:could not open default font 'fixed' When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please sendthe full server output, not just the last messages.This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Thanks and Regards Alok BarnwalElitecore Technologies404 -E-Wing, Mittal Towers, MG RoadMobile - 9845224566Phone -91-80-5065000Bangalore This e-mail message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient acknowledges that Elitecore Technologies Ltd. and / or its promoter Companies , as the case may be, are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of Elitecore Technologies Ltd and / or its promoter Companies, as applicable. Before opening any attachments please check
Re: [XFree86] resolution probs - GF4ti
Thanks, I have an ADI Microscan M900 so it looks like I have picked the wrong monitor. Does anyone have the correct config for an M900 - it's not listed in the X monitor list. thanks again. Jeff On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 06:00, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > ModelName"ADI MicroScan 17X+" > HorizSync24.6 - 60.0 > VertRefresh 50.0 - 120.0 > Option "dpms" > EndSection > >If those specs are correct, that monitor cannot do 1600x1200. > If it can do 1600x1200 then those specs are incorrect. > > > Mark. > > > On 4 Dec 2003, Jeff wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > Ive got a geforce 4ti 4200 AGP8x and cant get the resolution above > > 1280x960. I'm running the latest nvidia drivers - are there any problems > > with them?! > > > > my config is attached.I have even tried commenting out all other > > resolutions apart from 1600x1200 (the res i want) with no luck. > > > > I know both the monitor and gfx card support 1600x1200 - it works under > > windoze > > > > all help appreciated > > Jeff > > > ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] Civil Designer
RIC SIE Tel (408)482-2840[EMAIL PROTECTED] OBJECTIVE: STRUCTURAL & MECHANICAL DESIGNER CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL, TRANSPORTATION CAD Operator EXPERIENCE: 93 - present DESIGNER, ENGINEER, CAD MANAGER; "Mech-Tronic" Engineering & Design Service, Project Management & Development. Preparing technical documentation, calculations, layouts drawings & propositions. CAD Management and Operations, drafting & redesigning. Intergraph, MicroStation, Autodesk, ACAD, Win, Net, Softdesk Mgmt Civil, Bridges and Structural Design, Plans, Mapping, Detail Freeway & Roadway, data translation & inserting. Script & CAD automation. Geological Structures, Viaducts, Freeways, Highways, Shopping Center. Architectural and Environmental Projects and cooperation; military facilities and plans, Cities, Airports, remediation drawings upgrade, correcting and redesign. Traffic design & problem analyzes-reorganize. Freeway Design & Drafting Support, Site analyzing for Caltrans, Architectural, Archeotype & Electrical drawings, "as is" and initial design; Develop remediation procedure and equipment for lead painted buildings. Construction management, Job site inspection, civil & structural support Mechanical Evaluations - Design - Service and Maintenance; R&D. EDUCATION: Institute for Business & Technology, California CAD Engineer, Programming, Design, Management Electro - Mechanical College Mechanical Engineering - BS Degree DOS, UNIX, MAC, SUN computers; WP, dBASE, Lotus, Network, Lisp, Windows & Appl., PFS, Graphics, CAD/CAM, Basic, Fortran, Analyzes. METRIC, SOLAR, AutoCAD/Computer Instructor. Transportation Spec. Personal Designer, MS Project, MS Works, Excel, Access, C, Script, File Management, File transfer. Learn quickly, work independly, shift, overtime. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] hello
Watch the Hottest Adult Hustler DVD's All at Megasixtynine for Just $1!!! CLICK HERE FOR A FREE TOUR! no more of these
[XFree86] Check it out
Watch the Hottest Adult Hustler DVD's All at Megasixtynine for Just $1!!! CLICK HERE FOR A FREE TOUR! no more of these
[XFree86] Radeon 920, hardware 3D
I've got my new machine with the Radeon 9200. I want to try and setup the hardware 3D support for it. I am going to build the latest development snapshot and or the CVS and try to set it up. How stable are these? Do you have any tips or suggestions on the building or configuration? Is there an easier way? Thanks, Tom Corner On 20-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: > one thing you will run into is that if your new motherboard supports 8x > and your radeon supports 8x, you will need a patched version of agpgart > that supports 8x or the DRI will not work if you are using linux 2.4.x. > 2.6 supports 8x natively. Just a heads up. > > Alex > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I signed onto the developer list too now. When the computer comes, I >> am >> thinking of trying driver snapshots or CVS versions. I have heard >> that ATI does >> not support their own driver very well. >> >> Thanks again, >> Tom >> >> On 20-Nov-2003 Alex Deucher wrote: >> > The drivers do not currently have support for agp 8x. Michel has a >> > patch on his website from ati, but it hasn't been applied/tested >> yet as >> > far as I know. I don't have the link off hand. I doubt you will >> > notice any difference between 8x and 4x. >> > >> > Let me know how it goes. >> > >> > Alex >> > >> > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Thanks. I don't get to test it until the laptop with radeon >> mobility >> >> 9200 >> >> comes next week. I understand the 9200 is the same as the 9000 >> >> except that the >> >> agp is 8x instead of 4x. Can I specify agp 8x to take advantage >> of >> >> the higher >> >> speed? >> >> >> >> Thanks again, >> >> >> >> Tom Corner >> >> >> > >> > >> > __ >> > Do you Yahoo!? >> > Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now >> > http://companion.yahoo.com/ >> > ___ >> > Devel mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >> --- >> |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & >> \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ) ( 20-Nov-2003 16:50:41 Vienna, Austria >> ( * * ) mailer: xfmail >> \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at >> --- >> ___ >> Devel mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree > ___ > XFree86 mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86 --- |\/\/\___/\/\/| Carol Anne Corner & \ o o / Thomas Corner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ( 04-Dec-2003 11:47:41 Vienna, Austria ( * * ) mailer: xfmail \___/ Web Page: www.corner.chello.at --- ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] xserver crash
hi ! i have xserver XFree86 Version 4.3.0 on RH9.0. it was working fine until i happen to reboot the machine from terminal without exiting from the xwindow. since then i am not being able to run xwindow. it prompts for username and password as normal. but when both username and password is supplied, the blue screen appears and doesnot progress beyond that. i have tried XFree86 -configure which prompts to run XFree86 -xf86config /root/XF86config.new but the problem remained the same. the only message i could see in the terminal is (++) Using Config file: "/root/XF86Config.new" someone please advice me. thanks in advance. ___ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
[XFree86] AFTER-HOURS TRADING - Breaking News...kristen
AFTER-HOURS TRADING - BREAKING NEWS
Get Quote - http://quote.money.cnn.com/quote/quote?symbols=htds
Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated - HTDS - Announces: Receipt of Tubercin Toxicity
Study and Formation of Scientific Advisory Panel - Wednesday December 3, 8:04 pm ET
DELRAY BEACH, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 3, 2003--Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated
(Pink Sheets: HTDS) announces today that the spokesperson for the independent medical
group conducting the testing for HTTD (HTDS) has forwarded the formal Testing Results
of Tubercin®'s Toxicity Trials to HTTD.
Tubercin of five different concentrations was administered to five groups of mice. A
pathologist at the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center performed autopsies.
The mice were randomized and only the control mouse was known to the pathologist, as
stated in the cover letter of the Pathology Report.
The report concludes, "All tissues evaluated, visceral organs and the brain were
essentially normal in appearance." "The importance of this report is even better than
I expected," stated the spokesperson for the medical group. "As the testing continues
and if the results are similar to those of Chemotherapy and or radiation with no
harmful side effects, Tubercin has enormous potential for the treatment of cancer and
the immune system."
The President and CEO of HTTD, Mr. Colm J. King is in the process of forming a
Scientific Advisory Panel with leading Oncologists and Immunologists from prestigious
institutions in the U.S. The panel will review the reports and results of Tubercin®'s
findings and will report back to Mr. King with the ongoing reports in layman language
for the shareholders.
"We are continuing to receive promising results regarding Tubercin® and we're looking
forward to additional positive results in the near future," stated Mr. King. "These
tests prove that Tubercin® is non-toxic and is the first step on the way to human
clinical trials as well as the first positive breakthrough conducted in the United
States with an independent medical group for Tubercin®.
Operating out of Delray Beach, Florida, Hard to Treat Diseases Incorporated ("HTTD")
holds the international marketing rights, except South Korea, to Tubercin®, a patented
immunostimulant developed for combating Cancer under medical patent (US Patent
6,274,356). The unique properties unlike other cancer products are clearly stated in
the abstract summary of the patent... "A carbohydrate complex, which is a mixture of
low molecular-weight polysaccharides of an arabinomannan structure extracted from
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is highly effective in treating various cancer patients
without incurring any adverse side effects."
Statements in this press release that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Those
statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of
the Company and its management. Such statements reflect management's current views,
are based on certain assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results,
events, or performance may differ materially from the above forward-looking statements
due to a number of important factors, and will be dependent upon a variety of factors,
including, but not limited to, our ability to obtain additional financing and access
funds from our existing financing arrangements that will allow us to continue our
current and future operations and whether demand for our product and testing service
in domestic and international markets will continue to expand. The Company undertakes
no obligation to publicly update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that occur after the date hereof or to reflect any change in the
Company's expectations with regard to these forward-looking statements or the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
iv lylc siz qiuoikvovtfom
oml
kebin
g jqrsn jtabintn
[XFree86] xfree86@xfree86.org
picture008.GIF Description: Binary data
