[xHarbour-developers] Changelog 2016-10-10 22:05 UTC-0300 Luiz Rafael Culik
* contrib/gtwvw/gtwvw.c ! fixed call to HB_TRACE() macro in hb_gt_FuncInit function. was passing an diferent name of parameter found when compiling with -DHB_TR_LEVEL=HB_TR_DEBUG * source/rdd/dbf1.c * source/rdd/dbf1net.c ! fixed call to HB_TRACE() macro in hb_dbfTableTransaction function. was passing an non declared password found when compiling with -DHB_TR_LEVEL=HB_TR_DEBUG * gtcgi/gtcgi.c ! in hb_gt_cgi_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) ! using hb_xgrabz insted of hb_xgrab/memset calls * gtcrs/gtcrs.c ! hb_gt_crs_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) * gtpca/gtpca.c ! hb_gt_pca_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of ( void * ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) * gtsln/gtsln.c ! hb_gt_sln_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of ( void * ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) * gtstd/gtstd.c ! hb_gt_std_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of ( void * ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) ! using hb_xgrabz insted of hb_xgrab/memset calls * gttrm/gttrm.c ! hb_gt_trm_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of ( void * ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) ! using hb_xgrabz insted of hb_xgrab/memset calls * gtwin/gtwin.c ! hb_gt_win_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) * gtwvt/gtwvt.c ! in hb_gt_wvt_New using hb_xgrabz insted of hb_xgrab/memset calls ! hb_gt_wvt_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of ( void * ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) ! in hb_gt_wvt_Info using cast to ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of (HB_PTRDIFF) when calling GetStdHandle * gtxwc/gtxwc.c ! hb_gt_xwc_Init changed HB_TRACE to cast hFilenoStdin, hFilenoStdout, hFilenoStderr as ( void * ) ( HB_PTRUINT ) insted of ( void * ) ( HB_PTRDIFF ) * include/hbinit.h * updated to allow new gcc to compile borrow ideia from harbour * include/hbvm.h ! removed ULONG ulId to the follow functions : hb_vmProcessSymbols, hb_vmProcessSysDllSymbols, hb_vmProcessPrgDllSymbols,hb_vmProcessExeUsesDllSymbols * include/hbvmpub.h ! removed ULONG ulId to the follow function : hb_vmRegisterSymbols * source/compiler/genc.c ! changed to generate the new HB_INIT_SYMBOLS_EX_END * source/vm/hvm.c ! updated the follow functions to use the removed the parameter ULONG ulId: hb_vmProcessSymbols, hb_vmProcessSysDllSymbols, hb_vmProcessPrgDllSymbols,hb_vmProcessExeUsesDllSymbols and hb_vmRegisterSymbols * source/vm/estack.c * source/vm/initsymb.c * source/vm/maindlle.c * source/vm/maindllh.c * source/vm/maindllp.c * source/vm/runner.c * source/vm/usedll.c ! updated to reflect the change on hb_vmProcessSymbols -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?
Thank you Luiz! 😀 Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone Regards Luiz Em 10 de out de 2016 11:27, "Patrick Mast" < patrick.m...@xharbour.com [patrick.m...@xharbour.com] > escreveu: Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Thanks! But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-) What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change? Patrick-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Thanks! But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-) What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change? Patrick-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?
Il 10/10/2016 16:23, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Patrick > > I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Great! Looks as the best solution. EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?
Luiz, Thanks for considering. What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change? Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick i can keep the fix for init on new gcc and revert to not need pcode change Regards Luiz Em 10 de out de 2016 09:08, "Patrick Mast" < patrick.m...@xharbour.com [patrick.m...@xharbour.com] > escreveu: Hey Luiz, If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the changes. It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right? PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND 3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoid it, I’m in favour. Patrick On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Rafael Culik < cul...@gmail.com [cul...@gmail.com] > wrote: Patrick, Enrico Revert or keep changes? Regards Luiz 2016-10-09 13:18 GMT-03:00 Enrico Maria Giordano < e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it [e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it] > : Il 09/10/2016 17:43, Rafael Culik ha scritto: Patrick Not need recompile ill revert changes today Thank you, Luiz! EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it [http://www.emagsoftware.it] http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic [http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic] http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum [http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum] http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg [http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg]-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?
Hey Luiz, If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the changes. It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right? PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND 3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoid it, I’m in favour. Patrick On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick, Enrico Revert or keep changes? Regards Luiz 2016-10-09 13:18 GMT-03:00 Enrico Maria Giordano < e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it [e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it] > : Il 09/10/2016 17:43, Rafael Culik ha scritto: Patrick Not need recompile ill revert changes today Thank you, Luiz! EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it [http://www.emagsoftware.it] http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic [http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic] http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum [http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum] http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg [http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg]-- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
