[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

> Yes. It is a valid mailbox.

http://www2.logwatch.org:81/tabs/docs/logwatch.8.html

  --mailto address
  Mail the results to the email address or user spec­
  ified in address.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] AV filter from P.Lindemann

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

I have noticed lately that filter script frezzes (xmail 1.17 and av 
filter 1.7). So I need to restart xmail to unblock this.
Anyone with the same problem?

--Sasa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

Sönke Ruempler wrote:

>>I have setup MAILTO variables for crontab to normal email address but I 
>>can't receive Logwatch report because it still want to send it to 
>>. I have tried to change it directly in the logwatch file but 
>>looks like I don't know the right syntax for email. I have tried like 
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I always get 
>>back error for MAILTO.
>>
>>
>
>And [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid mailbox/alias in XMail?
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  
>
Yes. It is a valid mailbox.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

> I have setup MAILTO variables for crontab to normal email address but I 
> can't receive Logwatch report because it still want to send it to 
> . I have tried to change it directly in the logwatch file but 
> looks like I don't know the right syntax for email. I have tried like 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I always get 
> back error for MAILTO.

And [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid mailbox/alias in XMail?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:

>
> > The DEFAULT_DOMAIN thingy is valid only for XMail's sendmail.
>
> Davide, i never got mails from you early in the germanies morning - are y=
ou
> coding 2.0 heheh?

Guys my network is currently a mess and I could be arrested if someone
knows the tricks I'm doing to be visible. Damn registrar.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Problems compiling against uClibc.

2003-09-29 Thread Henri van riel

Hello Davide,

Monday, September 29, 2003, 7:07:32 PM, you wrote:


> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Henri van riel wrote:

>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile XMail 1.17 for my uClibc system but I get
>> compilation errors I have not been able to solve, could somebody point
>> me in the right direction? These are the errors I get:
>>
>> 
>> 
>> (everything fine so far, then:)
>> g++  -O2 -I. -D__UNIX__ -D__LINUX__ -DXMAIL_X86 -D_REENTRANT=1
>> -D_THREAD_SAFE=0 -c MiscUtils.cpp
>> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `int MscGetTimeNbrString (char *, int, long int)':
>> MiscUtils.cpp:273: structure `tmSession' with uninitialized const members
>> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `int MscGetTime (tm &, int &, int &, long int)':
>> MiscUtils.cpp:303: structure `tmTimeGM' with uninitialized const members
>> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `int MscGetTimeStr (char *, int, long int)':
>> MiscUtils.cpp:351: structure `tmTime' with uninitialized const members
>> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `char *MscLogFilePath (const char *, char *)':
>> MiscUtils.cpp:930: structure `tmLocTime' with uninitialized const members
>> make: *** [MiscUtils.o] Error 1

> I have no idea. Something is really wrong though since declarations are
> perfectly legal.

Yeah, I know. The problem is (was) in uClibc's time.h. It said:
__const char tm_zone[8]; where it should be *__const char tm_zone; in
the tm struct.

I've changed it and the errors are gone, XMail 1.17 compiles but I
don't know if it will also actually work without a problem... I think
I can expect some overwrites. I'll test it though.

Thanks!

-- 
Henri.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

> The DEFAULT_DOMAIN thingy is valid only for XMail's sendmail.

Davide, i never got mails from you early in the germanies morning - are you
coding 2.0 heheh?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

Sönke Ruempler wrote:

>>I have still problem with user  without domain. I am using 1.17
>>under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
>>setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
>>root in this default domain.
>>Any idea?
>>
>>
>
>DEFAULT_DOMAIN is for the sender and replace for example the MAIL_FROM
>CronDaemon to [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is no solution in XMail to do
>that for the RCPT - you can only set the MAILTO variable in your crontabs -
>or you have to edit the config files of the other tools, that write directly
>to 'root' or something. that is working fine here :)
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  
>
I have setup MAILTO variables for crontab to normal email address but I 
can't receive Logwatch report because it still want to send it to 
. I have tried to change it directly in the logwatch file but 
looks like I don't know the right syntax for email. I have tried like 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I always get 
back error for MAILTO.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

> # cat $MAIL_ROOT/spool/?/?/slog/

humm now it works, stupid customers :-P

ignore that davide, was my failure
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

Davide Libenzi wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I have still problem with user  without domain. I am using 1.17
>>under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
>>setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
>>root in this default domain.
>>Any idea?
>>
>>
>
>The DEFAULT_DOMAIN thingy is valid only for XMail's sendmail.
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  
>
Yes, I am running Xmail's sendmail. So why it doesn't want to work?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

> I have still problem with user  without domain. I am using 1.17
> under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
> setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
> root in this default domain.
> Any idea?

DEFAULT_DOMAIN is for the sender and replace for example the MAIL_FROM
CronDaemon to [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is no solution in XMail to do
that for the RCPT - you can only set the MAILTO variable in your crontabs -
or you have to edit the config files of the other tools, that write directly
to 'root' or something. that is working fine here :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:

> I have still problem with user  without domain. I am using 1.17
> under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
> setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
> root in this default domain.
> Any idea?

The DEFAULT_DOMAIN thingy is valid only for XMail's sendmail.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] problem with

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

Hi!

I have still problem with user  without domain. I am using 1.17 
under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have 
setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user 
root in this default domain.
Any idea?

Sasa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:

>
> > Well, the RFC "suggest" to return an 552 error code in such case, and t=
his
> > is what XMail returns right now. It used to return a 4xx in the very
> > beginning but it has been changed. My initial though indeed had been th=
at
> > a full mailbox was a temporary condition.
>
> mhm my internal XMail server (1.17) keeps trying tos end the message if t=
he
> remote (main) XMail server return Mailbox full. How can that be?

# cat $MAIL_ROOT/spool/?/?/slog/



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

> Well, the RFC "suggest" to return an 552 error code in such case, and this
> is what XMail returns right now. It used to return a 4xx in the very
> beginning but it has been changed. My initial though indeed had been that
> a full mailbox was a temporary condition.

mhm my internal XMail server (1.17) keeps trying tos end the message if the
remote (main) XMail server return Mailbox full. How can that be?

--
Soenke

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Accepting postmaster@ even from blocked addresses

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Tracy wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I've been looking over the problem of RFC compliance for postmaster@,
> abuse@ and a couple of other aliases, and I'm wondering if there's an
> existing configuration option that can be used to allow mail - even from
> addresses in spammers.tab and spam-addresses.tab - that are addressed to
> these RFC mailboxes?
>
> If there's not a configuration option to allow this, I guess I could go in
> an modify the source - but I'm going to have a hard time figuring how to do
> this, without making all the other blocking ineffectual. I suppose I could
> do the checks in RCPT TO processing, and accept/reject based on that...
>
> Any ideas, suggestions?

This is noted. I'll see what I can do in 2.0 ...



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: SMTP Auth

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Toby Reiter wrote:

>
> Ok,
> I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
> thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
>
> a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
> existing mail users from sending out messages using SMTP auth, as
> long as their email clients are able to handle this?

Right



> b) Is there any easy way to test SMTP auth to make sure it is working
> (ideally, from a telnet connection from an outside network to port
> 25)?

Try to send a message from an IP not listed inside smtprelay.tab to a
remote account using SMTP auth.


> c)  Will SMTP auth be indicated in the logs at all?

It is indicated inside msg headers and logs.




- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] news server at saltstorm

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

Hi!

I just have noticed that nobody is looking the messages thru news 
server. I have find one user to post directly but still didn't receive 
any answer.
Does anyone check news server ?

Sasa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: ValGrind(ing) XMAIL

2003-09-29 Thread Veeresh Khanorkar

I had a feeling that it was not debugged through valgrind. I will 
suggest that we can go ahead with valgrinding xmail. The immediate 
benefit I see is to have xmail flawless (If any exist there), as well as 
there would be considerable increase in performance.

Regards,
Veeresh

Davide Libenzi wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Davide,
>>
>>Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
>>similar, please do inform the same.
>>
>>
>
>No I did not.
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bill Healy wrote:

>
> It's a temporary error not a permanent error, the person at the other
> end might empty the mailbox at any time and then the message could go
> through.

Well, the RFC "suggest" to return an 552 error code in such case, and this
is what XMail returns right now. It used to return a 4xx in the very
beginning but it has been changed. My initial though indeed had been that
a full mailbox was a temporary condition.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Bill Healy

It's a temporary error not a permanent error, the person at the other
end might empty the mailbox at any time and then the message could go
through.

Bill

>--
>From:  S=F6nke Ruempler[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent:  Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:45 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:   [xmail] Mailbox full question
>
>
>hi davide,
>
>once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to =
send a
>message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is =
that
>right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately back to the
>sender?!
>
>
>--
>
>Soenke.
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: List down

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:

> No it is not down. 8-)

I'm currently running with a crappy configuration to cope with the
registrar policy/dumbness.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:

>
> No problem :)  but you missed the point, why is XMail doing that for
> negative values?  I would expect it to ignore anything except what in the
> docs, right?

XMail does bit-and the number to unmask certain bits, that's why this
result.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: List down

2003-09-29 Thread Sasa Stupar

Davide Libenzi wrote:

>On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Nick Marino wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Is the list down???
>>>  
>>>
>>I guess not ;-)
>>
>>
>
>Yes, sadly it is. Hope today will come back, otherwise I'll change
>registrar.
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>  
>
No it is not down. 8-)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.

2003-09-29 Thread Shawn Anderson

No problem :)  but you missed the point, why is XMail doing that for
negative values?  I would expect it to ignore anything except what in the
docs, right?

Shawn 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 10:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.


On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:

>
> I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not
notify
> anyone.   Is that expected behavior?

So, here's the rule. Do not return neg values.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body
of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line
"help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:

>
> I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not notify
> anyone.   Is that expected behavior?

So, here's the rule. Do not return neg values.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.

2003-09-29 Thread Shawn Anderson

I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not notify
anyone.   Is that expected behavior?

Shawn

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.


On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:

>
> Davide,
>
> I am curious about something,  what happens in I have a filter that 
> returns error codes that are negative?  For example -1 or -5?

I believe it depends on the OS. Try it ...



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body
of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line
"help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: ValGrind(ing) XMAIL

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:

>
> Davide,
>
> Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
> similar, please do inform the same.

No I did not.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] ValGrind(ing) XMAIL

2003-09-29 Thread Veeresh Khanorkar

Davide,

Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
similar, please do inform the same.

Regards,
Veeresh


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] test

2003-09-29 Thread Nick Marino

test


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 9/26/2003
Tested on: 9/29/2003 4:42:46 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Hide password in log

2003-09-29 Thread Andreas Hansson

>
> > I have enabled POP logs. Is there any way to hide passwords in that log?
>
> What about setting the correct permissions to MAIL_ROOT ?
>

Setting correct permissions works fine for the case you think of.

I prefer not having cleartext passwords in log files because if I'm
debugging someone's failing mail fetch attempts and have them visiting in my
office, I would prefer being able to safely browse log file contents without
having to try to obscure the view of my monitor from the visitor.

Andreas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] SMTP Auth

2003-09-29 Thread Toby Reiter

Ok,
I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I 
thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:

a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow 
existing mail users from sending out messages using SMTP auth, as 
long as their email clients are able to handle this?

b) Is there any easy way to test SMTP auth to make sure it is working 
(ideally, from a telnet connection from an outside network to port 
25)?

c)  Will SMTP auth be indicated in the logs at all?

Thanks in advance for any answers to these questions.

Regards,
Toby
-- 
Toby Reiter  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Breezing Internet Communications http://www.breezing.com
1106 West Main Stphone:434.295.2050
Charlottesville, VA 22903fax:603.843.6931
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Xmail Administrator 0.24 released

2003-09-29 Thread Don Drake

What changed?

-Don

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Xmail Administrator 0.24 released


A few updates to Xmail Administrator

see: http://www.webifi.com/xmail

-John

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:

>
> hi davide,
>
> once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to send =
a
> message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is tha=
t
> right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately back to the
> sender?!

If the remote server returns an 4xx response, XMail will keep trying.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Mailbox full question

2003-09-29 Thread Sönke Ruempler

hi davide,

once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to send a
message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is that
right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately back to the
sender?!


--

Soenke.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Problems compiling against uClibc.

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Henri van riel wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile XMail 1.17 for my uClibc system but I get
> compilation errors I have not been able to solve, could somebody point
> me in the right direction? These are the errors I get:
>
> 
> 
> (everything fine so far, then:)
> g++  -O2 -I. -D__UNIX__ -D__LINUX__ -DXMAIL_X86 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=0 -c 
> MiscUtils.cpp
> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `int MscGetTimeNbrString (char *, int, long int)':
> MiscUtils.cpp:273: structure `tmSession' with uninitialized const members
> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `int MscGetTime (tm &, int &, int &, long int)':
> MiscUtils.cpp:303: structure `tmTimeGM' with uninitialized const members
> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `int MscGetTimeStr (char *, int, long int)':
> MiscUtils.cpp:351: structure `tmTime' with uninitialized const members
> MiscUtils.cpp: In function `char *MscLogFilePath (const char *, char *)':
> MiscUtils.cpp:930: structure `tmLocTime' with uninitialized const members
> make: *** [MiscUtils.o] Error 1

I have no idea. Something is really wrong though since declarations are
perfectly legal.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Question about filter return codes.

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:

>
> Davide,
>
> I am curious about something,  what happens in I have a filter that returns
> error codes that are negative?  For example -1 or -5?

I believe it depends on the OS. Try it ...



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: List down

2003-09-29 Thread Davide Libenzi

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:

>
> Nick Marino wrote:
>
> > Is the list down???
>
> I guess not ;-)

Yes, sadly it is. Hope today will come back, otherwise I'll change
registrar.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: List down

2003-09-29 Thread Peter Lindeman

Nick Marino wrote:

> Is the list down???

I guess not ;-)

Peter

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] List down

2003-09-29 Thread Nick Marino

Is the list down???


---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 9/26/2003
Tested on: 9/29/2003 7:51:05 AM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]