[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Larkman
The usual error the users are receiving is that the POP server did not
respond appropriately.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:

> Any ideas why Xmail might go inactive on FreeBSD? So far, I've not
found
> a log entry that might explain it.

Can you give a lot more info about what you mean for inactive?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:

> Any ideas why Xmail might go inactive on FreeBSD? So far, I've not found
> a log entry that might explain it.

Can you give a lot more info about what you mean for inactive?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Larkman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:

> Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a
similar
> problem.

No, this is a Linux/glibc only thing.


Crud. I was afraid of that. :)

Any ideas why Xmail might go inactive on FreeBSD? So far, I've not found
a log entry that might explain it.

- Ken

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Ken Larkman wrote:

> Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar
> problem.

No, this is a Linux/glibc only thing.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Chad Fleenor
Thanks guys,   I'll give that a try and update you on Monday on how it
goes



Chad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dale Qualls
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

Follow Davide's exact wording.

He's the MAN!!

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 01:10PM >>>


Do I put it in the script the way Davide had it. "export
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4"?  or do I just do LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4 ? or do
I
have to specify 2.4.1?

Chad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Ken Larkman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar
problem.

- Ken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:

> I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with
XMail
> staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
> day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email
messages.
> I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.
Also,
> sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
> specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
> until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
> more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any
ideas
> what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line
switches
> I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.

In your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail add:

export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Dale Qualls
Follow Davide's exact wording.

He's the MAN!!

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 01:10PM >>>


Do I put it in the script the way Davide had it. "export
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4"?  or do I just do LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4 ? or do I
have to specify 2.4.1?

Chad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Ken Larkman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar
problem.

- Ken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:

> I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with
XMail
> staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
> day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email
messages.
> I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.
Also,
> sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
> specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
> until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
> more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any
ideas
> what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line
switches
> I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.

In your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail add:

export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Chad Fleenor


Do I put it in the script the way Davide had it. "export
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4"?  or do I just do LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4 ? or do I
have to specify 2.4.1?

Chad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ken Larkman
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar
problem.

- Ken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:

> I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with
XMail
> staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
> day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email
messages.
> I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.
Also,
> sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
> specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
> until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
> more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any
ideas
> what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line
switches
> I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.

In your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail add:

export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Bowen Moursund
> Received: from wbar2.lax1-4-8-215-172.dsl-verizon.net 
> (4.8.215.172:3684)
> by mail with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
> id  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
> Received: from 120.244.122.0 by 4.8.215.172; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 
> 14:56:45 +0300
> Message-ID: 

[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Don Drake
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Don Drake wrote:
>
> > In my test case, I added the following at the top of each perl
script:
> >
> > `/bin/cp $fileName /tmp/virus`;
> >
> > Where $fileName is the file passed to the filter.
> >
> > This appears to be GIGO.
>
> It is my understanding that those filters *always* modify the message that
> XMail will be using soon after. Do they use binmode() ?
>

No, they don't.  I don't see how this matters, in my particular case:
running Linux, binmode has little effect on text files.

The point I'm trying to make is that the file shown was what was received
from XMail *before* the filter itself read the file and possibly modified
it.  By doing a diff after the Virus filter examined it and right before SA
looked at it, they are exactly the same.

-Don

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Ken Larkman
Is this likely to work with FreeBSD 5.1, as well? I am having a similar
problem.

- Ken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active


On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:

> I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with
XMail
> staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
> day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email
messages.
> I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.
Also,
> sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
> specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
> until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
> more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any
ideas
> what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line
switches
> I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.

In your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail add:

export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Dale Qualls
Have you tried putting

LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1

in the xmail script?

It may need to be

LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D"2.4.1"

I don't recall which.  This is a known RH9 issue.

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/19/04 12:10PM >>>
I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail
staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email messages.
I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.  Also,
sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any ideas
what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line switches
I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.
=20

Thanks

Chad

=20



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Chad Fleenor wrote:

> I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail
> staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
> day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email messages.
> I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.  Also,
> sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
> specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
> until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
> more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any ideas
> what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line switches
> I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.

In your /etc/rc.d/init.d/xmail add:

export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Don Drake wrote:

> In my test case, I added the following at the top of each perl script:
> 
> `/bin/cp $fileName /tmp/virus`;
> 
> Where $fileName is the file passed to the filter.
> 
> This appears to be GIGO.

It is my understanding that those filters *always* modify the message that 
XMail will be using soon after. Do they use binmode() ?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Trouble with XMail staying active

2004-02-19 Thread Chad Fleenor
I'm running XMail 1.17 and RedHat 9.0 and I'm having trouble with XMail
staying active.  It seems like I have to restart XMail at least once a
day.  XMail stops responding so none can send or receive email messages.
I have checked the queue and I didn't see anything unusual in it.  Also,
sometimes XMail will "act like it's working fine" but when I send to a
specific user it will not write anything out to the mailbox directory
until I restart XMail.  This is very strange, and it has happened on
more than one occasion to two different people.  If anyone has any ideas
what is going on I'd love to hear it.  Here is the command line switches
I have in: -Pl -Sl -Ql -Yl -Fl -Cl -Ll -F.
 

Thanks

Chad

 



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Don Drake
In my test case, I added the following at the top of each perl script:

`/bin/cp $fileName /tmp/virus`;

Where $fileName is the file passed to the filter.

This appears to be GIGO.

-Don

- Original Message 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [xmail] Re: Blank Emails
Date: 02/19/04 11:35

>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
>
> > We have seen this only when the email contained a foreign
characterset, such
> > as KIO8-R or BIG5.  Still don't know why, though.
>
> Do those filters binmode() on in/out descriptors?
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message
to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:

> We have seen this only when the email contained a foreign characterset, such
> as KIO8-R or BIG5.  Still don't know why, though.

Do those filters binmode() on in/out descriptors?



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Shiloh Jennings
We have seen this only when the email contained a foreign characterset, such
as KIO8-R or BIG5.  Still don't know why, though.


- Original Message - 
From: "Don Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:04 AM
Subject: [xmail] Blank Emails


> I've noticed lately that I have been receiving blank emails.  They have no
> From:, no Subject and no Content.  From looking at the headers in Outlook,
> the mail was always spam (from a yahoo account that I don't recognize).
>
> I thought it was a filter (virus scanner and/or SpamAssassin) corrupting
the
> file during processing.  That doesn't seem to be the case.
>
> To verify this, I've modified each of my filters to copy the email file to
> there own directory before they do any processing.  I then waited for the
> blank message to show up again...
>
> A new one came in this morning,  both the virus scanner version and spam
> assassin version are exactly the same.  Here's the contents of the file
with
> to To: address modified:
>
> 4.8.215.172:3684;10.1.0.4:25;Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
> mail
> S79B3C
> MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <>
> Received: from wbar2.lax1-4-8-215-172.dsl-verizon.net (4.8.215.172:3684)
> by mail with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
> id  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
> Received: from 120.244.122.0 by 4.8.215.172; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:56:45
+0300
> Message-ID: 
>
> This doesn't appear to be a valid email - there is no blank line after the
> Message-ID line, that's where it ends.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> -Don
> --
> Donald Drake
>
> President
> Drake Consulting
> http://www.drakeconsult.com/
> 312-560-1574
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Kelly McTiernan
Hi,

I get the same thing sometimes!  What's your set-up?  I'm using XMail 1.18
with Courier IMAP (unpatched for cr/lf bug)/OpenLDAP Auth on Solaris 8.
It's not a severe problem, as it's usually only a couple and the frequency
of occurance is every few days, but it is annoying.

- Kelly

> I've noticed lately that I have been receiving blank emails.  They have
> no
> From:, no Subject and no Content.  From looking at the headers in
> Outlook,
> the mail was always spam (from a yahoo account that I don't recognize).
>
> I thought it was a filter (virus scanner and/or SpamAssassin) corrupting
> the
> file during processing.  That doesn't seem to be the case.
>
> To verify this, I've modified each of my filters to copy the email file
> to
> there own directory before they do any processing.  I then waited for the
> blank message to show up again...
>
> A new one came in this morning,  both the virus scanner version and spam
> assassin version are exactly the same.  Here's the contents of the file
> with
> to To: address modified:
>
> 4.8.215.172:3684;10.1.0.4:25;Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
> mail
> S79B3C
> MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <>
> Received: from wbar2.lax1-4-8-215-172.dsl-verizon.net (4.8.215.172:3684)
> by mail with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
> id  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
> Received: from 120.244.122.0 by 4.8.215.172; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:56:45
> +0300
> Message-ID: 
>
> This doesn't appear to be a valid email - there is no blank line after
> the
> Message-ID line, that's where it ends.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> -Don
> --
> Donald Drake
>
> President
> Drake Consulting
> http://www.drakeconsult.com/
> 312-560-1574
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Blank Emails

2004-02-19 Thread Don Drake
I've noticed lately that I have been receiving blank emails.  They have no
From:, no Subject and no Content.  From looking at the headers in Outlook,
the mail was always spam (from a yahoo account that I don't recognize).

I thought it was a filter (virus scanner and/or SpamAssassin) corrupting the
file during processing.  That doesn't seem to be the case.

To verify this, I've modified each of my filters to copy the email file to
there own directory before they do any processing.  I then waited for the
blank message to show up again...

A new one came in this morning,  both the virus scanner version and spam
assassin version are exactly the same.  Here's the contents of the file with
to To: address modified:

4.8.215.172:3684;10.1.0.4:25;Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
mail
S79B3C
MAIL FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>
Received: from wbar2.lax1-4-8-215-172.dsl-verizon.net (4.8.215.172:3684)
by mail with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server]
id  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:00:46 -0600
Received: from 120.244.122.0 by 4.8.215.172; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:56:45 +0300
Message-ID: http://www.drakeconsult.com/
312-560-1574




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: SPF

2004-02-19 Thread Shiloh Jennings
I think SA 2.70 does, but not SA 2.63.  SA 2.70 is available but not
considered production ready.


- Original Message - 
From: "Charles Frolick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:56 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SPF


> Spamassasin doesn't do SPF?  The anti-spam software I use for my main
> mail server does it as a content filter. (Imail with Declude Junkmail)
>
> I'm sure someone can make one or make an existing filter to use SPF,
> since I use Xmail for special tasks and not general mail I don't run any
> spam filters (anything it sees has already been filtered), and I'm not
> familiar enough with spamassasin to know what it can filter on.
>
> Thanks,
> Chuck Frolick
> ArgoLink.net
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Liron Newman
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: SPF
>
>
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Don Drake wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>I agree, this is getting a lot of attention lately...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >When more than 1% of the existing internet mail infrastructure will use
> >it, I'll think about it. I do not want to add code to XMail for a non
> >standard that might die tomorrow.
> >
> >
> >
> A legitimate thought, but how about adding the ability to write some
> kind of plugin/filter that would do that outside of XMail (i.e.
> In-session filtering)
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the
> body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the
> line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: SPF

2004-02-19 Thread Don Drake
SpamAssassin does not do SPF.  It will incorporate it in a future version.

-Don

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Frolick
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: SPF
> 
> 
> Spamassasin doesn't do SPF?  The anti-spam software I use for my main
> mail server does it as a content filter. (Imail with Declude Junkmail)
> 
> I'm sure someone can make one or make an existing filter to use SPF,
> since I use Xmail for special tasks and not general mail I 
> don't run any
> spam filters (anything it sees has already been filtered), and I'm not
> familiar enough with spamassasin to know what it can filter on.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chuck Frolick
> ArgoLink.net
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Liron Newman
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: SPF
> 
> 
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Don Drake wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>I agree, this is getting a lot of attention lately...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >When more than 1% of the existing internet mail 
> infrastructure will use
> >it, I'll think about it. I do not want to add code to XMail 
> for a non 
> >standard that might die tomorrow.
> >
> >  
> >
> A legitimate thought, but how about adding the ability to write some 
> kind of plugin/filter that would do that outside of XMail (i.e. 
> In-session filtering)
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> xmail" in the
> body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general 
> help: send the
> line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: SPF

2004-02-19 Thread Shiloh Jennings
That is fair.  This is technology that will gain widespread support.  Now it
is only a matter of waiting to see which of the three competing standards
(rmx, dmp, spf) is the one that actually gains widespread support.
Regardless of which ever standard gains support, you may need to make some
subtle changes to the forwarding options in Xmail to take advantage of the
tech.  A I understand it, this issue applies to each of the three.  As soon
as SA 2.70 is officially released, you may want to update the forwarding
stuff even if you don't yet want to implement filtering based on spf.  I
suspect that SA is being used by at least 1% of the internet mail
infrastructure.


- Original Message - 
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:05 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: SPF


> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Don Drake wrote:
>
> > I agree, this is getting a lot of attention lately...
>
> When more than 1% of the existing internet mail infrastructure will use
> it, I'll think about it. I do not want to add code to XMail for a non
> standard that might die tomorrow.
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: SPF

2004-02-19 Thread Charles Frolick
Spamassasin doesn't do SPF?  The anti-spam software I use for my main
mail server does it as a content filter. (Imail with Declude Junkmail)

I'm sure someone can make one or make an existing filter to use SPF,
since I use Xmail for special tasks and not general mail I don't run any
spam filters (anything it sees has already been filtered), and I'm not
familiar enough with spamassasin to know what it can filter on.

Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Liron Newman
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: SPF


Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Don Drake wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I agree, this is getting a lot of attention lately...
>>
>>
>
>When more than 1% of the existing internet mail infrastructure will use
>it, I'll think about it. I do not want to add code to XMail for a non 
>standard that might die tomorrow.
>
>  
>
A legitimate thought, but how about adding the ability to write some 
kind of plugin/filter that would do that outside of XMail (i.e. 
In-session filtering)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the
line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Courier-imap and Xmailserver, full working solution mini how-to !!!

2004-02-19 Thread Mircea Ciocan
Hi everybody, I had a feeling that I've send this mail before but I 
didn't find it in the list archive and also in my send folder, so I've 
must be dreamed ;) and because I belive that will be helpful for many 
people before the official integration and production readyness of IMAP 
protocol in Xmailserver-2.0 here is the definitive, full working, 
intensively tested and Bug Free ( TM) solution:   ;)))

  COURIER-IMAP and Xmailserver mini How-To ver 0.1


This mini how-to was made possible by SmartPost Romanian team and it 
explains full integration  of courier-imap package with Xmaiserver.

Initial issues: As we all know Xmailserver is the answer of 
everything mail but IMAP, some people insist that having nice IMAP 
folders, eventually shared and other niceties is a fact of life and they 
can't live without it.
Here enters courier-imap server that uses the same maildir format as 
xmailserver but the messages are stored not in RFC format but in Unix 
format, this causes grave mis-functioning with outlook express and other 
mailers. A patch was done by somebody to correct this issue but it only 
corecteted partially and didn't treat with mixed enviroment mails ( 
mails with both Unix and RFC line termination), more it was broken with 
Moziila mail and other mails that were asking for parts of IMAP message 
at a time and not the full message as OE asked.
Also during tests is seem that the message name mangling made by 
courier produced some strange results, some messeges beeing seen twice 
in some mail clients when delivered via Xmail POP3 server. Somebody ( 
Leonardo Fogel,  please step up for full credits !!!)  patched  the  
POP3  side of  Xmail [1]  ( Davide, please, pretty please include this 
tiny, little, not intrusive patch in 1.18 final, plizzz ;) but the patch 
circulated for courier was definitly broken.
So during tests for the new and improved SmartPost2 webmail and 
administration interface Andrei Latchescu ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )  along 
with yours tester Mircea Ciocan ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]) devised a patch 
for courier [2] that was able to corectly deliver the messages 
regardless of their line termination both on its imap and pop3 side ( 
some people also like to use the pop3 side of courier server). This 
patch was tested with all curent mail clients ( M$ Outlook, Outlook 
Express, Mozilla Mail 1.4-1.6, The Bat, Pegasus Mail) and worked 
flawlessly, so we claim that is ready for production use. The patch is 
against (tested) Courier-Imap ver. 2.2.0 and 2.2.1 ( it may work with 
older versions).
So now you can seaminglesly migrate between Courier and Xmailserver 
and have even mixed mode messages in the folders ( like no need to 
convert all those 134.000 messages inherited ;).


The work was sponsored by Swiss ISP PCDS ag ( http://www.pcds.ch).

[1] Xmailserver POP3 patch: 
http://mircea.smartpost.ro/download/POP3Svr.cpp.diff

[2] Courier IMAP patch: 
http://mircea.smartpost.ro/download/courier-imap-crlf.patch.bz2

[3] Patched Courier and Xmailserver RPMs ( and SRPMs) for Mandrake 
Linux 9.2: http://mircea.interplus.ro/ftp/ultraupdates

Hope that you'll forgive this long message and find it usefull.

Regards,

Mircea Ciocan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]