[xmail] Re: XmailAdmin for Windows
Hello, Tracy wrote: > If it's the one I think it is (Xmail Administrator, written Visual Basic), > I have it working here with XMail 1.19-pre01 It also worked with 1.18 > here... > > I've got regular domains and alias domains, but no custom domains. Don't > know if that makes a difference or not... Have you got Visual Basic 6 installed on your system ? I'm wondering if the problem is the usage of some non standard component. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
At 12:06 5/31/2004, you wrote: > From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF >record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will always >pass. As long as not all domains in the whole world do have SPF records >what is the sense of this at all? Reducing bounces due to virus spew and joe jobs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XmailAdmin for Windows
If it's the one I think it is (Xmail Administrator, written Visual Basic), I have it working here with XMail 1.19-pre01 It also worked with 1.18 here... I've got regular domains and alias domains, but no custom domains. Don't know if that makes a difference or not... At 11:43 5/31/2004, you wrote: >On Mon, 31 May 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote: > > > The XmailAdmin tool from http://www.webifi.com/xmail/ worked great with > > XMail 1.17, but crashes with XMail 1.20. When I click on the server = > > name to > > bring up a list of domains, it says Run-time error '5': Invalid = > > procedure > > call or argument. Any idea what changed in XMail that causes XMailAdmin = > > to > > fail? > >I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes, >aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author. > > >- Davide > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >>When will XMail creates the XMail.memleaks file? It is running here now > >>but the file is not created yet. Will it be created only when a leak is > >>detected? > > > > Only when it exits. > > So when I let it run until, lets say Wednesday orso, then let it stop > with .shutdown it will create the file. Will that do ? Yes, then pass the file trhu the Perl script like I said in the previous email, and send the result over. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
Davide Libenzi wrote: >>When will XMail creates the XMail.memleaks file? It is running here now >>but the file is not created yet. Will it be created only when a leak is >>detected? > > Only when it exits. So when I let it run until, lets say Wednesday orso, then let it stop with .shutdown it will create the file. Will that do ? -- Groeten, Peter Cannot detect carrier. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 7 days, 3 hours and 38 minutes, 1 user logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote: > Interested in Win32 results? Is it even relevant? They'll be the same. And the tracer does not work w/out gcc. I can make it sys independent, but it is not worth since leaks will show in the same way. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the > > report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the > > report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated > > the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but > > nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24 > > hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here. > > When will XMail creates the XMail.memleaks file? It is running here now > but the file is not created yet. Will it be created only when a leak is > detected? Only when it exits. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
Interested in Win32 results? Is it even relevant? Davide Libenzi wrote: >I setup an XMail leak tracing infrastructure for Linux. I was hoping that >valgrind was doing the job fine, but it turned out not to be the case. The >thing lives as an external patch: > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
Davide Libenzi wrote: > Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the > report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the > report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated > the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but > nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24 > hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here. When will XMail creates the XMail.memleaks file? It is running here now but the file is not created yet. Will it be created only when a leak is detected? -- Groeten, Peter What do you mean that wasn't a copy? - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 7 days, 3 hours and 28 minutes, 1 user logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> I setup an XMail leak tracing infrastructure for Linux. I was hoping that
> valgrind was doing the job fine, but it turned out not to be the case. The
> thing lives as an external patch:
>
> http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-memtracer-0.1.diff
>
> You get the patch and the XMail .tar.gz, and:
>
> $ tar xvzf xmail-?.??.tar.gz
> $ cd xmail-?.??
> $ patch -p1 < ../xmail-memtracer-0.1.diff
> $ export XMAIL_DEBUG=1
> $ make -f Makefile.lnx
>
> Then you copy the XMail binary from inside the "bin" directory to your
> XMail's binary folder, and you restart XMail. To get clean memory leak
> reports, XMail must be shutdown cleanly:
>
> $ touch $MAIL_ROOT/.shutdown
>
> Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the
> report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the
> report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated
> the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but
> nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24
> hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here.
You don't have actually to send me the binary image and the trace file. It
is sufficent that you drop the Perl script below in xmtrace.pl and:
$ cat /tmp/XMail.memleaks | ./xmtrace.pl $MAIL_ROOT/bin/XMail
and send me the result ...
- Davide
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# xmtrace.pl by Davide Libenzi ( XMail Perl memory trace decoder )
# Copyright (C) 2004 Davide Libenzi
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
#
# Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#
use strict;
my $binimage;
my %cache;
if ($#ARGV < 0) {
print STDERR "use: ${0} binary < trace-file\n";
exit(1);
}
$binimage = $ARGV[0];
sub get_sym {
my ($hexn) = @_;
my $ln;
if (defined($cache{$hexn})) {
return $cache{$hexn};
}
if (open(ADDR, "addr2line -e $binimage $hexn|")) {
$ln = ;
close(ADDR);
$ln =~ s/([^\r\n]*)[\r\n]+/$1/;
if ($ln ne '??:0') {
$cache{$hexn} = $ln;
return $cache{$hexn};
}
}
return $hexn;
}
while () {
my $ln;
my ($hexn, $sym);
($ln = $_) =~ s/([^\r\n]*)[\r\n]+/$1/;
if ($ln !~ /from=0x[0-9a-zA-Z]+/) {
print $ln . "\n";
next;
}
($hexn = $ln) =~ s/.*from=0x([0-9a-zA-Z]+).*/$1/;
$sym = get_sym($hexn);
$ln =~ s/(.*from=)0x([0-9a-zA-Z]+)(.*)/${1}${sym}${3}/;
print $ln . "\n";
}
exit(0);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
Davide Libenzi wrote: >>>Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the >>>report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the >>>report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated >>>the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but >>>nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24 >>>hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here. >>> >> >>Do you want reports of more systems? > > > That would help, yes. Letting it run a couple of days and then cleanly > shut it down. Ok, will build it and post the result here in a couple of days. -- Groeten, Peter Biplex port is initializing. Wait a few seconds and redial. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 7 days, 2 hours and 8 minutes, 0 users logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the > > report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the > > report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated > > the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but > > nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24 > > hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here. > > > > Do you want reports of more systems? That would help, yes. Letting it run a couple of days and then cleanly shut it down. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: MemTracing XMail ...
Davide Libenzi wrote: > Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the > report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the > report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated > the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but > nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24 > hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here. > Do you want reports of more systems? -- Groeten, Peter Loopback detected. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 7 days, 1 hours and 59 minutes, 0 users logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail is giving RCPT=EAVAIL for an existing user/alias
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote: > > > > Yes. If you have "SmtpServerDomain" set, this happens. > > > > Okay - good to know! >From the next version, such field (1st of the log) will be set to the "SmtpServerDomain" value. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail is giving RCPT=EAVAIL for an existing user/alias
Am Mo, 2004-05-31 um 21.12 schrieb Davide Libenzi: > > Are you sure the alias file does not get modified outside of XMail? > Thats exactly the solution - at 14:52 i deleted an entry inside aliases.tab (using vi) - beginning with 14:55 mail for the mentioned alias was rejected -->> your answer made me sleep better this night! > > Yes. If you have "SmtpServerDomain" set, this happens. > Okay - good to know! > > 2 . smtp-sessions ending with "RCPT=EAVAIL / mailbox is not available" > > are logged with an empty 6th column (normally theres written > > "example.org" - in the time mail was refused there is written "") > > This is normal for rejected rcpts. > Davide, Thanks a lot for the quick explanation. Achim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] DSPAM
Anyone had any experience with DSPAM (http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/)? At all? Under XMail? Under Win32? All of the above? :) Thanks. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] MemTracing XMail ...
I setup an XMail leak tracing infrastructure for Linux. I was hoping that valgrind was doing the job fine, but it turned out not to be the case. The thing lives as an external patch: http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-memtracer-0.1.diff You get the patch and the XMail .tar.gz, and: $ tar xvzf xmail-?.??.tar.gz $ cd xmail-?.?? $ patch -p1 < ../xmail-memtracer-0.1.diff $ export XMAIL_DEBUG=1 $ make -f Makefile.lnx Then you copy the XMail binary from inside the "bin" directory to your XMail's binary folder, and you restart XMail. To get clean memory leak reports, XMail must be shutdown cleanly: $ touch $MAIL_ROOT/.shutdown Then you have to wait (ps) that the last XMail process vanished, and the report will be available in /tmp/XMail.memleaks. You need to send the report to me together with the *exact* copy of the binary that generated the report. Note that XMail uses a little bit more memory when traced, but nothing close to the amount that valgrind uses. I am running it by 24 hours, and I can say that it has zero leaks here. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail is giving RCPT=EAVAIL for an existing user/alias
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Achim Schmidt wrote: > Hi List, > > did anybody ever experience the following situation: > > There is [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is an alias to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a mailproc.tab with this content: > "redirect""[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Normally mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is expanded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and finally redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > But this afternoon (the second time we realized) xmail startet giving > "RCPT=EAVAIL" when mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was sent (first time was > another valid user at another machine running xmailserver). After > restarting the xmail process, mail for this alias was again accepted > correctly. Are you sure the alias file does not get modified outside of XMail? > The smtp-log shows this: > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.13" "2004-05-31 13:20:24" > "bt3.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S26550E" "RECV=OK" "" "24885" "" > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.13" "2004-05-31 13:23:50" > "bt3.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S26552F" "RCPT=OK" "" "0" "" > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.13" "2004-05-31 13:38:17" > "bt3.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S2655A9" "RCPT=OK" "" "0" "" > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.15" "2004-05-31 14:55:21" > "bmx.provider.net" "" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "S26581A" "RCPT=EAVAIL" "" "0" "" > > .. > about 30 lines with RCPT=EAVAIL > .. > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.15" "2004-05-31 19:45:41" > "bmx.provider.net" "" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "S2663E3" "RCPT=EAVAIL" "" "0" "" > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.4" "2004-05-31 19:56:23" > "lancelot.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S266426" "RCPT=OK" "" "0" "" > > "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.4" "2004-05-31 19:56:49" > "lancelot.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S266426" "RECV=OK" "" "1226" "" > > > > Thats what I recognize here: > > 1 . the first column is empty in logs/smtp-* beginning with 23-Jan-2004 > (before "$hostname" was written inside the first col) Yes. If you have "SmtpServerDomain" set, this happens. > 2 . smtp-sessions ending with "RCPT=EAVAIL / mailbox is not available" > are logged with an empty 6th column (normally theres written > "example.org" - in the time mail was refused there is written "") This is normal for rejected rcpts. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Xmail is giving RCPT=EAVAIL for an existing user/alias
Hi List, did anybody ever experience the following situation: There is [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is an alias to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a mailproc.tab with this content: "redirect" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Normally mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is expanded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and finally redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But this afternoon (the second time we realized) xmail startet giving "RCPT=EAVAIL" when mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was sent (first time was another valid user at another machine running xmailserver). After restarting the xmail process, mail for this alias was again accepted correctly. The smtp-log shows this: "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.13" "2004-05-31 13:20:24" "bt3.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S26550E" "RECV=OK" "" "24885" "" "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.13" "2004-05-31 13:23:50" "bt3.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S26552F" "RCPT=OK" "" "0" "" "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.13" "2004-05-31 13:38:17" "bt3.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S2655A9" "RCPT=OK" "" "0" "" "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.15" "2004-05-31 14:55:21" "bmx.provider.net" "" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S26581A" "RCPT=EAVAIL" "" "0" "" .. about 30 lines with RCPT=EAVAIL .. "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.15" "2004-05-31 19:45:41" "bmx.provider.net" "" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S2663E3" "RCPT=EAVAIL" "" "0" "" "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.4" "2004-05-31 19:56:23" "lancelot.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S266426" "RCPT=OK" "" "0" "" "" "mail.provider.net" "10.20.30.4" "2004-05-31 19:56:49" "lancelot.provider.net" "example.org" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "S266426" "RECV=OK" "" "1226" "" Thats what I recognize here: 1 . the first column is empty in logs/smtp-* beginning with 23-Jan-2004 (before "$hostname" was written inside the first col) 2 . smtp-sessions ending with "RCPT=EAVAIL / mailbox is not available" are logged with an empty 6th column (normally theres written "example.org" - in the time mail was refused there is written "") The system this happened today is xmail 1.18 on suse 8.2. The other system that showed this behavoiur some months ago worked with suse8.0 and xmail 1.1* (dont exactly remember which version it was those days) Any Ideas, hints or suggestions? Is this a bug or perhaps a feature? Thanks in advance, Achim Schmidt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...
On Mon, 31 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > 1.20 release files are available here: > >=20 > > http://www.xmailserver.org > >=20 > > This fixed the possible memory leak and the use-after-free bug: > >=20 > > http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#may_30__2004_v_1_20 > >=20 > > I definitely recommend to update to 1.20 >=20 > Ok, now running on the fallback server (in valgrind environment). >=20 > Debug log at the known location. I am looking into making a patch to integrate my leak-tracer in XMail. It= =20 worked better than valgrind yesterday :-/ - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...
Davide Libenzi wrote: > 1.20 release files are available here: > > http://www.xmailserver.org > > This fixed the possible memory leak and the use-after-free bug: > > http://www.xmailserver.org/ChangeLog.html#may_30__2004_v_1_20 > > I definitely recommend to update to 1.20 Ok, now running on the fallback server (in valgrind environment). Debug log at the known location. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: bad download? [SOLVED]
Sorry guys. My Gentoo portage script had "emake -f Makefile.lnx" and something in the "emake" command was messing it up. I changed it to plain "make" and it's fine. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: bad download?
Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2004, Kevin Williams wrote: > > >>I tried to build 1.20 on my Linux server, but it fails with a message >>about SysMachine.h not found. Has anyone else had any troubles? Is there >>an md5sum of the download files? > > > Very strange. For the .tar.gz: > > 1c9279508957b2c03e024412ade9bb19 > > > > - Davide > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks. The md5sum matches my file. Another odd note. There are only 3 makefiles in the tarball - bsd, lnx, and sso. No plx, slx, or ssx, as I see in the 1.18 tarball. Those don't matter to me, I'm just trying to figure out why it won't compile. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Michael Luke wrote: > Peter Lindeman wrote: > > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > >>> This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP > >>> filters. Any takers? > >> > >> > >> Me me: > >> > >> http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl > > > > From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF > > record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will always > > pass. As long as not all domains in the whole world do have SPF > > records what is the sense of this at all? > > Not true. > > SPF can be used in 'best guess' mode for a domain with no DNS record. > > I'm not sure exactly how this works, but I believe that it defaults to > allowing mail from any A or MX host in the sending domain. O, that's what the "guess" option in the above script is for. Lemme try it ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >>>This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP filters. >>>Any takers? >> >> >>Me me: >> >>http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl > > > From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF > record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will always > pass. As long as not all domains in the whole world do have SPF records > what is the sense of this at all? > Perhaps no one wants my $0.02, but I just finished my own SPF filter and DNS records so I'll speak up anyway. Given how simple it is to set up, why not? The list of domains implementing SPF is impressive, and growing rapidly. If the RFC is adopted then the reasons to implement it only increase. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >>This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP filters. > >>Any takers? > > > > > > Me me: > > > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl > > From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF > record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will always > pass. As long as not all domains in the whole world do have SPF records > what is the sense of this at all? Yes, I'm afraid it's something like that. OTOH adding a TXT record to your domain is not a biggie, and this helps your domains to avoid to be victims of forgery when someone sends messages to SPF enabled sites. The other step is to protect your site using SPF, like the above script helps to do. I'm currently giving it a shot on xmailserver. But there's still a long way ahead, since many domains do not use SPF. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > >>> This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP >>> filters. Any takers? >> >> >> Me me: >> >> http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl > > From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF > record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will always > pass. As long as not all domains in the whole world do have SPF > records what is the sense of this at all? Not true. SPF can be used in 'best guess' mode for a domain with no DNS record. I'm not sure exactly how this works, but I believe that it defaults to allowing mail from any A or MX host in the sending domain. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPF
Davide Libenzi wrote: >>This sounds like a perfect candidate for the new pre-data SMTP filters. >>Any takers? > > > Me me: > > http://www.xmailserver.org/xm-spf.pl From what I have seen now from it is that a domain should have a SPF record made in DNS, if the domain does not have it a mail will always pass. As long as not all domains in the whole world do have SPF records what is the sense of this at all? -- Groeten, Peter The media .INI file refers to an unknown device name. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 6 days, 22 hours and 6 minutes, 0 users logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: bad download?
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Kevin Williams wrote: > I tried to build 1.20 on my Linux server, but it fails with a message > about SysMachine.h not found. Has anyone else had any troubles? Is there > an md5sum of the download files? Very strange. For the .tar.gz: 1c9279508957b2c03e024412ade9bb19 - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] bad download?
I tried to build 1.20 on my Linux server, but it fails with a message about SysMachine.h not found. Has anyone else had any troubles? Is there an md5sum of the download files? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XmailAdmin for Windows
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes, > > aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author. > > 1.18 still worked with the tool. It stopped from 1.20 (or maybe 1.19 but > I never had 1.19) Yes, "aliasdomainlist" changed in 1.19. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XmailAdmin for Windows
Davide Libenzi wrote: > I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes, > aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author. 1.18 still worked with the tool. It stopped from 1.20 (or maybe 1.19 but I never had 1.19) -- Groeten, Peter Remote PPP peer is not responding. - - Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ? - Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com - Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org - ICQ 22383596 - Uptime lindeman.org - 6 days, 21 hours and 48 minutes, 1 user logged in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Domains & Domain Aliases
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Mike Harrington wrote: > Davide, > > I know you added an error message when trying to create a domain alias when > a domain name already exists, but the reverse is not true. I.E. > > aliasdomainadd [tab] foo.com [tab] newdomain.com > domainadd [tab] newdomain.com > > Shouldn't an error be given back to the user letting them know that a domain > already exists with that name, or is there some higher-purpose that I am > missing? I'll look into it. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: XmailAdmin for Windows
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote: > The XmailAdmin tool from http://www.webifi.com/xmail/ worked great with > XMail 1.17, but crashes with XMail 1.20. When I click on the server = > name to > bring up a list of domains, it says Run-time error '5': Invalid = > procedure > call or argument. Any idea what changed in XMail that causes XMailAdmin = > to > fail? I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes, aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Simple address rewriting question
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Jan Rovner wrote: > Hello, > > how can I solve a trivial address rewriting with XMAIL for the case of=20 > e-mail that is delivered to more users ? > > I've configured foo.com domain with users A, B and need to create > address rewriting as follows: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D=3D> A, B, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I.E. any mail coming to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be delivered to > (local) users A, B, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've tried to configure it using mailing lists but it did not work. > > Can you help me? This is a typical mailing list setup. It must work. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Simple address rewriting question
Hello, how can I solve a trivial address rewriting with XMAIL for the case of=20 e-mail that is delivered to more users ? I've configured foo.com domain with users A, B and need to create address rewriting as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D=3D> A, B, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] I.E. any mail coming to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be delivered to (local) users A, B, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've tried to configure it using mailing lists but it did not work. Can you help me? Thanks. Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] XmailAdmin for Windows
The XmailAdmin tool from http://www.webifi.com/xmail/ worked great with XMail 1.17, but crashes with XMail 1.20. When I click on the server = name to bring up a list of domains, it says Run-time error '5': Invalid = procedure call or argument. Any idea what changed in XMail that causes XMailAdmin = to fail? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Domains & Domain Aliases
Davide, I know you added an error message when trying to create a domain alias when a domain name already exists, but the reverse is not true. I.E. aliasdomainadd [tab] foo.com [tab] newdomain.com domainadd [tab] newdomain.com Shouldn't an error be given back to the user letting them know that a domain already exists with that name, or is there some higher-purpose that I am missing? -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
