[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...

2004-06-04 Thread Peter Lindeman
Sönke Ruempler wrote:

Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is
40MB.

And then upgrade the server :-)
 
 
 The problem is that if RSS goes over X, the system just kills XMail process,
 no matter if you have 40 MB or GB RAM :/
 

You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should upgrade 
  your glibc library on that machine.

-- 
Groeten,
Peter


E-mail returned to sender -- insufficient voltage.

-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com
- Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org
- ICQ 22383596
- Uptime lindeman.org - 10 days, 12 hours and 46 minutes, 0 users logged in.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...

2004-06-04 Thread Sönke Ruempler
 You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should
   upgrade your glibc library on that machine.

glibc-2.2.4-13
glibc-common-2.2.4-13
glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
gcc-2.96-98



-- 

Mit freundlichem Gruß

Sönke Ruempler
Technik

top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany

http://www.topconcepts.deTel. +49 1805 9977 501*
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Fax. +49 1805 9977 502*

SMS Versand ab 9.9 Cent: http://sms-gw.topconcepts.de

Handelsregister: AG Stade HRB 5811 - UstId: DE 213645563

*) EUR 0,12/Min. (CNS24)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] AW: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Harald Schneider
Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses =
some
mails when spamd is too busy.

http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
http://xmail.beaucox.com/

--Harald


 -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Toby Reiter
 Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Juni 2004 00:11
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: [xmail] Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?
=20
=20
 All,
 I find that mail that gets relayed through my backup MX does not=20
 always get caught by SpamAssassin. Does anyone have a similar=20
 experience? Does anyone have any hints about why this might happen?=20
 I'm using the Drake's SA_Filter, which works absolutely beautifully=20
 in all respects. I guess I could try and run in debug mode, but I'm=20
 not sure I would be able to coordinate things to actually see the=20
 relayed messages going through (it's not a huge amount of total=20
 traffic).
=20
 Any help is appreciated,
 Toby
=20
 --=20
 Toby Reiter  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Breezing Internet Communications http://www.breezing.com
 1106 West Main Stphone:434.295.2050
 Charlottesville, VA 22903fax:603.843.6931
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Rovner
Hello,

is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster?

During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20
1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
etc.).

It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via SMTP (and
puts it
in the queue) before it is delivered to its recipient...

And what is annoying is that xmail.exe process is doing almost nothing
(CPU 0-2%) :-(((

Any ideas? Maybe the queue scan interval should be faster, maybe more
threads ... ?

Thanks,
Jan

server.tab

RootDomainreality.sk
SmtpServerDomain  reality.sk
POP3Domainreality.sk
HeloDomainreality.sk
PostMaster[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RemoveSpoolErrors 1
SMTP-RDNSCheck0
MaxMessageSize20
AllowNullSender   0
CheckMailerDomain 0
SmartDNSHost  195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp

(everything else is commented)

MAIL_CMD_LINE
-Mr 24  -Pl -Sl -Ql -FI 127.0.0.1:79 -Cl -CI 127.0.0.1:6017 -Ll=20


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Sasa Stupar
Jan Rovner pravi:
 Hello,
 
 is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster?
 
 During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20
 1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
 etc.).
 
 It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via SMTP (and
 puts it
 in the queue) before it is delivered to its recipient...
 
 And what is annoying is that xmail.exe process is doing almost nothing
 (CPU 0-2%) :-(((
 
 Any ideas? Maybe the queue scan interval should be faster, maybe more
 threads ... ?
 
 Thanks,
 Jan
 
 server.tab
 
 RootDomain  reality.sk
 SmtpServerDomainreality.sk
 POP3Domain  reality.sk
 HeloDomain  reality.sk
 PostMaster  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 RemoveSpoolErrors   1
 SMTP-RDNSCheck  0
 MaxMessageSize  20
 AllowNullSender 0
 CheckMailerDomain   0
 SmartDNSHost195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp
 
 (everything else is commented)
 
 MAIL_CMD_LINE
 -Mr 24  -Pl -Sl -Ql -FI 127.0.0.1:79 -Cl -CI 127.0.0.1:6017 -Ll=20
 
This sounds like dns problems.


-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: sasa.vcf


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Rovner
This sounds like dns problems.

There should be no DNS problems, there are no firewalls, server is=20
connected directly to the backbone.=20

SmartDNSHost  195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp

DNS server is provided by the ISP, I've tried to use my own
Microsoft DNS server (127.0.0.1) but it did not help.

Any ideas how to determine where the problem is?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] AW: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Harald Schneider
Tweak the resend cycle:

-Qi ratio
Set the increment ratio of the reschedule time in =
sending a
messages. At every failure in delivery a message, =
reschedule
time T is incremented by (T / ratio), therefore :

 T(i) =3D T(i-1) + T(i-1)/ratio.

If you set this ratio to zero, T remain unchanged over
delivery tentatives. Default 16.

-Qr nretries
Set the maximum number of times to try to send the =
message.
Default 32.

Details see XQM Manual (search for zinc).

--Harald


 -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jan Rovner
 Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Juni 2004 12:38
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: [xmail] Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries
=20
=20
 Hello,
=20
 is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver=20
 mails faster?
=20
 During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=3D20
 1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
 etc.).
=20
 It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via SMTP (and
 puts it
 in the queue) before it is delivered to its recipient...
=20
 And what is annoying is that xmail.exe process is doing almost nothing
 (CPU 0-2%) :-(((
=20
 Any ideas? Maybe the queue scan interval should be faster, maybe more
 threads ... ?
=20
 Thanks,
 Jan
=20
 server.tab
=20
 RootDomain  reality.sk
 SmtpServerDomainreality.sk
 POP3Domain  reality.sk
 HeloDomain  reality.sk
 PostMaster  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 RemoveSpoolErrors   1
 SMTP-RDNSCheck  0
 MaxMessageSize  20
 AllowNullSender 0
 CheckMailerDomain   0
 SmartDNSHost195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp
=20
 (everything else is commented)
=20
 MAIL_CMD_LINE
 -Mr 24  -Pl -Sl -Ql -FI 127.0.0.1:79 -Cl -CI 127.0.0.1:6017 -Ll=3D20
=20
=20
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Rob Arends
You might find that the udp/tcp on your SmartDNSHost is the problem.

DNS queries are done via UDP
DNS zone transfers are done via TCP
You might find that because you are not defined as a valid secondary Name
Server for any zones on your ISPs DNS server, you will be blocked on TCP/53.

I recommend that you set as follows:

SmartDNSHost  195.28.64.119:udp

Then see what happens

Rob :)

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jan Rovner
Sent: Friday, 4 June 2004 8:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

This sounds like dns problems.

There should be no DNS problems, there are no firewalls, server is=20
connected directly to the backbone.=20

SmartDNSHost  195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp

DNS server is provided by the ISP, I've tried to use my own Microsoft DNS
server (127.0.0.1) but it did not help.

Any ideas how to determine where the problem is?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body
of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line
help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: AW: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Rovner
Thank all for the support !

Increasing SMAIL thread count and decreasing=20
retries (probably :-)) solved the problem:

-Qr 3 -Qn 100

Now, the xmail.exe process is taking some CPU :-) and queue=20
looks almost empty.

Regads,
Jan


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Harald Schneider
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] AW: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

Tweak the resend cycle:

-Qi ratio
Set the increment ratio of the reschedule time in =3D
sending a
messages. At every failure in delivery a message, =3D
reschedule
time T is incremented by (T / ratio), therefore :

 T(i) =3D3D T(i-1) + T(i-1)/ratio.

If you set this ratio to zero, T remain unchanged over
delivery tentatives. Default 16.

-Qr nretries
Set the maximum number of times to try to send the =3D
message.
Default 32.

Details see XQM Manual (search for zinc).

--Harald


 -Urspr=3DFCngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Jan Rovner
 Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Juni 2004 12:38
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: [xmail] Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries =3D20 =3D20  =
Hello,=20
=3D20  is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver=3D20  =

mails faster?
=3D20
 During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=3D3D20  1500 sending=20
messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors  etc.).
=3D20
 It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via SMTP (and =20
puts it  in the queue) before it is delivered to its recipient...
=3D20
 And what is annoying is that xmail.exe process is doing almost nothing

(CPU 0-2%) :-((( =3D20  Any ideas? Maybe the queue scan interval should =

be faster, maybe more  threads ... ?
=3D20
 Thanks,
 Jan
=3D20
 server.tab
=3D20
 RootDomain  reality.sk
 SmtpServerDomainreality.sk
 POP3Domain  reality.sk
 HeloDomain  reality.sk
 PostMaster  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 RemoveSpoolErrors   1
 SMTP-RDNSCheck  0
 MaxMessageSize  20
 AllowNullSender 0
 CheckMailerDomain   0
 SmartDNSHost195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp
=3D20
 (everything else is commented)
=3D20
 MAIL_CMD_LINE
 -Mr 24  -Pl -Sl -Ql -FI 127.0.0.1:79 -Cl -CI 127.0.0.1:6017 -Ll=3D3D20 =

=3D20 =3D20
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in =20
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  For general help:=20
send the line help in the body of a message to =20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] =3D20

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the
line help in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Toby Reiter
Toby Reiter pravi:
  All,
  I find that mail that gets relayed through my backup MX does not
  always get caught by SpamAssassin. Does anyone have a similar
  experience? Does anyone have any hints about why this might happen?
  I'm using the Drake's SA_Filter, which works absolutely beautifully
  in all respects. I guess I could try and run in debug mode, but I'm
  not sure I would be able to coordinate things to actually see the
  relayed messages going through (it's not a huge amount of total
  traffic).

  Any help is appreciated,
  Toby

Do you use filetrs.in.tab or filters.out.tab?
AFAIK you need to use filters.out.tab

--Sasa

Sasa,
Thanks for the question. I should be more clear. I have my backup at 
backup.domain.com and my primary at mail.domain.com.  When mail is 
relayed from backup, the filter on mail fails to trigger. I guess I 
could put a filter on the outgoing mail from backup, but I'm afraid 
this would cause problems if and when mail starts filtering those 
messages for SPAM (if only there was a way to prevent mail from being 
scanned twice).

Toby


-- 
Toby Reiter  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Breezing Internet Communications http://www.breezing.com
1106 West Main Stphone:434.295.2050
Charlottesville, VA 22903fax:603.843.6931
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: AW: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Toby Reiter
Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses =
some
mails when spamd is too busy.

http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip
http://xmail.beaucox.com/

Hmmm...how did i miss sa_filter2? I've been watching the list pretty 
closely -- I must have missed it being mentioned.

Thanks,
Toby
-- 
Toby Reiter  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Breezing Internet Communications http://www.breezing.com
1106 West Main Stphone:434.295.2050
Charlottesville, VA 22903fax:603.843.6931
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:

 I have a filter that runs XAV, both in fiters.in and filters.out.
 
 The line in the filters.*.tab is:
 **0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0av.tab
 (Yes, real tabs, don't worry.)
 
 av.tab says:
 c:\xav\xav.exec:\xav@@FILE@@FROM@@RCPT20
 
 But still xav.log shows me the *resolved* destination addresses of 
 virus-carrying messages rather than the recipient address specified in 
 the message itself.
 
 I did a test. I sent a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to an *alias* 
 of a mailbox in *another* domain of mine that has a redirect to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 What XAV logs is this:
 [2004-06-03 16:44:25] Virus Detected in MSG=[1086270301025.1804.pandora] 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 So, what am I missing here?

A redirect is not considered a delivery. The redirect will end up either 
locally or remotely, and this is where filters are triggered.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: SMTP filters and RCPT TO

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:

 Davide Libenzi wrote:
 is it possible to filter out RCPT TO lines in a SMTP filter (if there are
 more then one lines) so that I can change the recipient list?

 
 
 Yes. I need to check what happens if you leave the list empty though ...
 
   
 
 Is any modification ok (like adding recipients) or just removing recipients?
 
 
 
 You can, but remember that is going to look funny on the logs, since you 
 have no trace of it. And no, you cannot write the log file by yourself.
 
   
 
 What if I add a recipient that isn't local on the server? Would XMail 
 reject that message because it's a relay or would it be processed 
 correctly?

Nope, at that point cows are already escaped.



 And why not add another type of log line for modified RCPT lists...?

Nope, your script must know what it's doing.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:

  You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should
upgrade your glibc library on that machine.
=20
 glibc-2.2.4-13
 glibc-common-2.2.4-13
 glibc-devel-2.2.4-13
 gcc-2.96-98

Remember to shut down the server cleanly before reporting the leak log.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Jan Rovner wrote:

 Hello,
 
 is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster?
 
 During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20
 1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors
 etc.).

This is a clear DNS problem. Can you show one /spool/??/??/slog file for 
one message that is in the rsnd queue?



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Toby Reiter wrote:

 messages for SPAM (if only there was a way to prevent mail from being 
 scanned twice).

Add an header in the message.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I have a filter that runs XAV, both in fiters.in and filters.out.

The line in the filters.*.tab is:
**0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0av.tab
(Yes, real tabs, don't worry.)

av.tab says:
c:\xav\xav.exec:\xav@@FILE@@FROM@@RCPT20

But still xav.log shows me the *resolved* destination addresses of 
virus-carrying messages rather than the recipient address specified in 
the message itself.

I did a test. I sent a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to an *alias* 
of a mailbox in *another* domain of mine that has a redirect to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

What XAV logs is this:
[2004-06-03 16:44:25] Virus Detected in MSG=[1086270301025.1804.pandora] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So, what am I missing here?



A redirect is not considered a delivery. The redirect will end up either 
locally or remotely, and this is where filters are triggered.

  

So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are 
redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it 
would never ever run, right?

If so, what *can* I do to run a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is all 
redirects?

And how can I get the real address without reading the message file? I 
think these are both required features.. Actually they already were 
possible in the old filter architecture


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:

 So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are 
 redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it 
 would never ever run, right?
 
 If so, what *can* I do to run a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is all 
 redirects?

Use filter+redirect, instead of redirect only.



- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote:

  

So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are 
redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it 
would never ever run, right?

If so, what *can* I do to run a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is all 
redirects?



Use filter+redirect, instead of redirect only.


  

But then I would have to define the filter for each and every mailbox.. 
That's a bit of a problem, although it can be automated.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]