[xmail] Re: Gentoo ebuild?
It's not a stability issue, it's an ego problem. I wrote the original ebuild (bugs.gentoo.org) and someone else came in and raped it. The portage maintainers put the other guy's ebuild into Portage. Dustin C. Hatch wrote: > I just noticed that 1.20 is in portage as ~x86. Seems to be stable for > me... > Dustin > > Kevin Williams wrote: > > >>I use my own ebuild for xmail, as the one in portage doesn't work for me. >> >>You can submit a bug report to ask for a version bump. >> >> >>Dustin C. Hatch wrote: >> >> >> >>>Is anyone maintaining the Gentoo ebuild mail-mta/xmail-* ebuild? It >>>still shows xmail-1.16 as the most current version. >>> >>>Dustin >>>- >>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >>>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >>- >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Gentoo ebuild?
I just noticed that 1.20 is in portage as ~x86. Seems to be stable for me... Dustin Kevin Williams wrote: >I use my own ebuild for xmail, as the one in portage doesn't work for me. > >You can submit a bug report to ask for a version bump. > > >Dustin C. Hatch wrote: > > >>Is anyone maintaining the Gentoo ebuild mail-mta/xmail-* ebuild? It >>still shows xmail-1.16 as the most current version. >> >>Dustin >>- >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: Pop log
Even if no one but me had access to the files, I still don't see the need to have them "clear text". I mean really if your going to do that then theres no reason to have them encrypted in the mailusers.tab in the 1st place. Now is there ? -- Chris L. Franklin -- John Kielkopf wrote: >If someone has untrusted access to your logs, I think you may have >larger security issues to deal with. > > >Chris L. Franklin wrote: > > > >>True but none the less it still is a Security issue. I mean it is nice >>to see the password only if some ones having and Issue pop issue. But >>othere then that it's annoying. So really my only other choice i have >>is to turn pop3 logging. But then I can't really keep stats on the pop3 >>service. >> >>PS. True a script to convert that column to either blank or encrypted >>wouldn't be that hard at all, But then again neither would have a open >>in the server.tab or startup option to not allow passwords be shown >>"clear text" in the longs. I mean smtp don't log it's password. ;) >> >> >> >> >> > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
