[xmail] Re: Question about users aliases and domains aliases resolution prece dence

2004-09-28 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Thanks Davide



 -Message d'origine-
 De : Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Envoy=E9 : lundi 27 septembre 2004 20:22
 =C0 : XMail mailing list
 Objet : [xmail] Re: Question about users aliases and domains aliases
 resolution prece dence
=20
=20
 On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
=20
  Hello Davide
 =20
  A test case that I could name  'a cascade of aliases'
 =20
  We create a real domain realdom.com
  We create real accounts user1, user2 in realdom.com
  We create a domain alias aliasdom.com pointing to realdom.com
  Finally we create this user alias ON aliasdom.com :=20
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  pointing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  (yes xmail, on 1.17 at least accept creation of users alias=20
 on domains alias
  helpfull for me ...)
 =20
  Possible responses for final account depending in alias=20
 order resolution
  between user part and domain part :
 =20
  1 - Incoming mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  In others terms : alias resolving precedence is FIRST try=20
 finding user alias
  part in same domain (even if domain part is an alias=20
 itself) before trying
  to resolve domain alias part for final real domain
=20
 This one, and it won't very likely change.
=20
=20
=20
 - Davide
=20
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: AW: Pop log

2004-09-28 Thread Sonke Ruempler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote on Monday, September 27, 2004 10:09
PM:

 Even if no one but me had access to the files, I still don't see the
 need to have them clear text.

If you have 3000 mostly stupid customers and you must support them,
unencrypted passwords in the logs are a gift from heaven. ;-)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Gentoo ebuild?

2004-09-28 Thread Dustin C. Hatch
What is wrong with it?
Kevin Williams wrote:

It's not a stability issue, it's an ego problem. I wrote the original 
ebuild (bugs.gentoo.org) and someone else came in and raped it. The 
portage maintainers put the other guy's ebuild into Portage.

Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
  

I just noticed that 1.20 is in portage as ~x86.  Seems to be stable for 
me...
Dustin

Kevin Williams wrote:




I use my own ebuild for xmail, as the one in portage doesn't work for me.

You can submit a bug report to ask for a version bump.


Dustin C. Hatch wrote:



  

Is anyone maintaining the Gentoo ebuild mail-mta/xmail-* ebuild?  It 
still shows xmail-1.16 as the most current version.

Dustin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Gentoo ebuild?

2004-09-28 Thread Kevin Williams
The Gentoo Bugzilla has all the comments.

Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
 What is wrong with it?
 Kevin Williams wrote:
 
 
It's not a stability issue, it's an ego problem. I wrote the original 
ebuild (bugs.gentoo.org) and someone else came in and raped it. The 
portage maintainers put the other guy's ebuild into Portage.

Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
 


I just noticed that 1.20 is in portage as ~x86.  Seems to be stable for 
me...
Dustin

Kevin Williams wrote:


   


I use my own ebuild for xmail, as the one in portage doesn't work for me.

You can submit a bug report to ask for a version bump.


Dustin C. Hatch wrote:



 


Is anyone maintaining the Gentoo ebuild mail-mta/xmail-* ebuild?  It 
still shows xmail-1.16 as the most current version.

Dustin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

   


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 

 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Filtering

2004-09-28 Thread Peter Lindeman
Hello,
I understood that if a filter returns 16 the filtering would stop but 
all next filters as defined in filters.in.tab are executed.

Can I return a value to XMail that filtering is stopped even if not all 
defined filters has run?

-- 
Groeten,
Peter


Ik ben vrijgezel. Mijn schoonouders konden geen kinderen krijgen.

-
- Heb je een Dreambox 7000S ?
- Kijk eens op http://www.dreamvcr.com
- Kijk ook op http://www.lindeman.org
- ICQ 22383596
- Uptime lindeman.org - 10 days, 8 hours and 36 minutes, 0 users logged in.



-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: signature.asc
-- Desc: OpenPGP digital signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBWaYiUUfbspjY4aoRArMLAJ0aEaGuCT9w1gvZhz+3aQ4s70P6tgCghVna
Bm0v5OYINxULjBDZ/fh7Roo=
=TrVg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]